Re: Thread in which we speculate on the 11th album.
Posted: Sun October 20, 2013 9:33 pm
And Matt writes the other half.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I hope Jeff writes the music for at least half of the next album
And Matt writes the other half.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I hope Jeff writes the music for at least half of the next album
I will at least hope Matt gets a song or 2 in thereharmless wrote:And Matt writes the other half.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I hope Jeff writes the music for at least half of the next album
That's a shameWtOB? wrote:he saves them all for soundgarden now so Eddie can't ruin them.
Well, you have to respect him for that. I'm definitely excited about what SG have in them next time. I ended up being a bit hot and cold about King Animal but it was definitely a pretty good record.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:That's a shameWtOB? wrote:he saves them all for soundgarden now so Eddie can't ruin them.
I don't think i listened to the album all the way through. I wasn't ever really in the mood for itharmless wrote:Well, you have to respect him for that. I'm definitely excited about what SG have in them next time. I ended up being a bit hot and cold about King Animal but it was definitely a pretty good record.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:That's a shameWtOB? wrote:he saves them all for soundgarden now so Eddie can't ruin them.
Its a real possibilityelliseamos wrote:I'm sure somebody else has guessed it already, but I'd guess that Brendan O'Brien is going to write at least one song for PJ for this album.
I don't think these guys are at a point of their lives where they'd continue the band much longer should it stop being profitable.harmless wrote:I keep praying for a lack of commercial success. I think it's working.
I may have to give it a listen some time this next weekWtOB? wrote:king animal is fucking great and cornell sounds excellent on it.
Well, I guess it depends on what's meant by "profitable". Lightning Bolt won't make them mega-stars any more than better albums have. And I would be OK with them going out on this album, I reckon. That's no reflection of my feelings about the album itself, just the general direction they've moved in.theplatypus wrote:I don't think these guys are at a point of their lives where they'd continue the band much longer should it stop being profitable.harmless wrote:I keep praying for a lack of commercial success. I think it's working.
King Animal is far better than Lightning Bolt, just lacks a PendulumDr. Van Nostrand wrote:I may have to give it a listen some time this next weekWtOB? wrote:king animal is fucking great and cornell sounds excellent on it.
I meant "profitable" literally. If they start only breaking even or losing money, without a major label backing them, I doubt they'd be willing to take it much further at a loss. Just speculating.harmless wrote:Well, I guess it depends on what's meant by "profitable". Lightning Bolt won't make them mega-stars any more than better albums have. And I would be OK with them going out on this album, I reckon. That's no reflection of my feelings about the album itself, just the general direction they've moved in.theplatypus wrote:I don't think these guys are at a point of their lives where they'd continue the band much longer should it stop being profitable.harmless wrote:I keep praying for a lack of commercial success. I think it's working.
I doubt i will agree but ill give it a shot. For the record, the only soundgarden album i like in full is superunknown, the rest have a lot of songs i don't listen tofishbob wrote:King Animal is far better than Lightning Bolt, just lacks a PendulumDr. Van Nostrand wrote:I may have to give it a listen some time this next weekWtOB? wrote:king animal is fucking great and cornell sounds excellent on it.
On a positive note, since they don't have the high overheads of the major label backing, the band sees much more of the profits.theplatypus wrote:I meant "profitable" literally. If they start only breaking even or losing money, without a major label backing them, I doubt they'd be willing to take it much further at a loss. Just speculating.harmless wrote:Well, I guess it depends on what's meant by "profitable". Lightning Bolt won't make them mega-stars any more than better albums have. And I would be OK with them going out on this album, I reckon. That's no reflection of my feelings about the album itself, just the general direction they've moved in.theplatypus wrote:I don't think these guys are at a point of their lives where they'd continue the band much longer should it stop being profitable.harmless wrote:I keep praying for a lack of commercial success. I think it's working.
Fair enough; all I'm saying is that I don't know whether this new cartoony pop dumbed-down sound is actually meaning profit for them, any more than pre-S/T stuff was. We'll never know that, obviously, but they were probably perfectly fine financially on what they were doing back then.theplatypus wrote:I meant "profitable" literally. If they start only breaking even or losing money, without a major label backing them, I doubt they'd be willing to take it much further at a loss. Just speculating.harmless wrote:Well, I guess it depends on what's meant by "profitable". Lightning Bolt won't make them mega-stars any more than better albums have. And I would be OK with them going out on this album, I reckon. That's no reflection of my feelings about the album itself, just the general direction they've moved in.theplatypus wrote:I don't think these guys are at a point of their lives where they'd continue the band much longer should it stop being profitable.harmless wrote:I keep praying for a lack of commercial success. I think it's working.