Re: 2016-07-10: Telluride, Colorado
Posted: Tue July 12, 2016 5:38 am
I want to hear more about this.Iholdthepain wrote:Ed butchered Dave's last name
I want to hear more about this.Iholdthepain wrote:Ed butchered Dave's last name
It sounded kinda like Ed said "this song was written by our former drummer... Dave Ablerseesis?" as he looked back at Jeff... I think...Birds in Hell wrote:I want to hear more about this.Iholdthepain wrote:Ed butchered Dave's last name
Iholdthepain wrote:It sounded kinda like Ed said "this song was written by our former drummer... Dave Ablerseesis?" as he looked back at Jeff... I think...Birds in Hell wrote:I want to hear more about this.Iholdthepain wrote:Ed butchered Dave's last name
Oh, and after watching the video, I take it all back. It was absolutely great having Angel played in Telluride!
I love that song so damn much that I had an irrational emotional response in real time
Yep, exactly.tragabigzanda wrote:Well when you put it like that...Bammer wrote:tragabigzanda wrote:The unattractive differences have nothing to do with the aging of his pipes, and everything to do with his choice of phrasing. The time between the studio cut and this one is irrelevant.Bammer wrote:I'm going to help youevenslow wrote:Count me in this group as well. Cool that they tried it, but...CopperTom wrote:It was a surprise for sure, but I thought it sucked too.tragabigzanda wrote:I like the studio version of Angel, but this sounds disgusting to my ears.out with a little math.
The only version of that song which you're familiar with was recorded when Ed was approximately 30 years old. Now he's like 51 or something. It's going to sound different.
is Dave A. chud?!Bammer wrote: Dave A., as far as we know, is the only PJ member to have thetattoo.
WELCOME BACKmikejasond wrote:Wow this setlist looks awesome I love the starting with like 10 slow songs before going into Corduroy and stuff

why do you think he sings like thattragabigzanda wrote:The unattractive differences have nothing to do with the aging of his pipes, and everything to do with his choice of phrasing. The time between the studio cut and this one is irrelevant.Bammer wrote:I'm going to help youevenslow wrote:Count me in this group as well. Cool that they tried it, but...CopperTom wrote:It was a surprise for sure, but I thought it sucked too.tragabigzanda wrote:I like the studio version of Angel, but this sounds disgusting to my ears.out with a little math.
The only version of that song which you're familiar with was recorded when Ed was approximately 30 years old. Now he's like 51 or something. It's going to sound different.
I'm pretty sure I heard you cheering in that video.Strat wrote:I knew for certain we'd get setting forth, thin air, and some sort of WMA.
Thin Air was so beautiful.
I wasn't that close when pearl jam hit the stageE.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm pretty sure I heard you cheering in that video.Strat wrote:I knew for certain we'd get setting forth, thin air, and some sort of WMA.
Thin Air was so beautiful.
One of these times if I'm up close at a show and I see someone serious about recording a song, I need to go near them and yell "strat this is ruddo" and hope it gets posted to YouTube.Strat wrote:I wasn't that close when pearl jam hit the stageE.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm pretty sure I heard you cheering in that video.Strat wrote:I knew for certain we'd get setting forth, thin air, and some sort of WMA.
Thin Air was so beautiful.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:One of these times if I'm up close at a show and I see someone serious about recording a song, I need to go near them and yell "strat this is ruddo" and hope it gets posted to YouTube.Strat wrote:I wasn't that close when pearl jam hit the stageE.H. Ruddock wrote:I'm pretty sure I heard you cheering in that video.Strat wrote:I knew for certain we'd get setting forth, thin air, and some sort of WMA.
Thin Air was so beautiful.