Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:13 pm
I'm pretty sure that both Harrison Ford and Carrie Fisher would agree with me, at least until I called them bad actors.
Red Mosquito
Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Page 12 of 195
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:17 pm
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:19 pm
I do enjoy Bad Father Han, though.
Your name is BEN. We named the dog "Kylo."
Your name is BEN. We named the dog "Kylo."
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:23 pm
And we're supposed to believe this kind of thing is really funny. But TFA is just recycled and lazy. Gotcha. Maybe if I hadn't read the post and had just heard someone else read it to me?McParadigm wrote:I do enjoy Bad Father Han, though.
Your name is BEN. We named the dog "Kylo."
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:23 pm
This is just another rehash ofMcParadigm wrote:I do enjoy Bad Father Han, though.
Your name is BEN. We named the dog "Kylo."
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:27 pm
I still think RM should make a movie. We can certainly shit out something better than Force Awakens.
Lets do this.
Lets do this.
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:31 pm
That or you're so worked up and diabolically defensive about this movie that you are now arguing with a joke Twitter account.durdencommatyler wrote:And we're supposed to believe this kind of thing is really funny. But TFA is just recycled and lazy. Gotcha. Maybe if I hadn't read the post and had just heard someone else read it to me?McParadigm wrote:I do enjoy Bad Father Han, though.
Your name is BEN. We named the dog "Kylo."
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:31 pm
One of those, for sure.
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:33 pm
Yeah. That must be it.McParadigm wrote:That or you're so worked up and diabolically defensive about this movie that you are now arguing with a joke Twitter account.durdencommatyler wrote:And we're supposed to believe this kind of thing is really funny. But TFA is just recycled and lazy. Gotcha. Maybe if I hadn't read the post and had just heard someone else read it to me?McParadigm wrote:I do enjoy Bad Father Han, though.
Your name is BEN. We named the dog "Kylo."
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:38 pm
the mcp account has no arc!Mecca wrote:This is just another rehash ofMcParadigm wrote:I do enjoy Bad Father Han, though.
Your name is BEN. We named the dog "Kylo."A New Hopemy Last Crusade joke
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:41 pm
Bad Father Han Solo wrote:On most planets, the words "Kylo Ren" mean "emo Hitler."
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:41 pm
durd, your response please.
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:47 pm
Who knew the death of Han Solo would tear us apart.
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:49 pm
I'm gonna need a link that lists those planets, McP.
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:50 pm
Hilary's biggest criticism of the movie was the off camera bad parenting of Ben Solo.
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:51 pm
1. Achtoodurdencommatyler wrote:I'm gonna need a link that lists those planets, McP.
2. other
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:52 pm
I think that's all of them.
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:55 pm
Here is the test. Han and leia splitting up is utterly inessential to the plot of the movie. They could have been together and he finds Rey and Finn out on some random mission and it is easy to contrive a reason to go to Maz's place.
Are you more interested in that story, or the one we got?
Are you more interested in that story, or the one we got?
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:58 pm
Here is the test. The trade dispute didn't have to happen in order for the Jedi to have reason to fairly quickly meet Natalie Portman and then end up on Tatooine. They could have just met her out in some random mission and then gone there. Which do you prefer?
Or perhaps you just prefer not that story at all.
Or perhaps you just prefer not that story at all.
Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 11:58 pm
are those my only two choices?stip wrote:Here is the test. Han and leia splitting up is utterly inessential to the plot of the movie. They could have been together and he finds Rey and Finn out on some random mission and it is easy to contrive a reason to go to Maz's place.
Are you more interested in that story, or the one we got?