Red Mosquito

Dev wrote:Gav rules but im not a beta so I can deal with it.

Dev you're a total fucking beta, who the hell are you kidding? You're one of the pansiest, fragilest people here. Don't front

*says something slightly mean to Dev*

Dev: you made me depressed... I gotta go take a walk and think about some things

.

Yes he is

And he's gonna fucking like it

.

just cuz im clinically depressed doesn't mean im not a total gangster.

Bi_3 wrote:jail time in California for willfully using wrong pronouns?

"The bill is very, very clear that what is prohibited is the willful engagement and repeated engagement in discriminatory conduct against LGBT seniors," UC Davis law professor Courtney Joslin told Poliifact, when asked to review the text of the legislation. Criminal charges would only follow, she said, if the violation reached a level that was shown to cause the risk of death or serious physical injury, in accordance with existing state penalty structures.

McParadigm wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:jail time in California for willfully using wrong pronouns?

"The bill is very, very clear that what is prohibited is the willful engagement and repeated engagement in discriminatory conduct against LGBT seniors," UC Davis law professor Courtney Joslin told Poliifact, when asked to review the text of the legislation. Criminal charges would only follow, she said, if the violation reached a level that was shown to cause the risk of death or serious physical injury, in accordance with existing state penalty structures.

Yeah, that article seemed very overract-y, hence the question mark.

Bi_3 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:jail time in California for willfully using wrong pronouns?

"The bill is very, very clear that what is prohibited is the willful engagement and repeated engagement in discriminatory conduct against LGBT seniors," UC Davis law professor Courtney Joslin told Poliifact, when asked to review the text of the legislation. Criminal charges would only follow, she said, if the violation reached a level that was shown to cause the risk of death or serious physical injury, in accordance with existing state penalty structures.

Yeah, that article seemed very overract-y, hence the question mark.

Plus it's California, so the moment you assume it's too absurd to be true...

Shouldn't the Trump 45 thread be retitled Adventures in Babysitting?

.

.

An article on a website called ONE ANGRY GAMER complaining about the SJW agenda goddammit Burt my targeted ads are gonna fucking suck this week

.

I still don't know what that actually means and I really couldn't be arsed to do the research.

.

The wife and I would like to thank you for having us to your dinner party.