Song of the Moment: Sirens

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

So...Sirens?

5 stars
47
38%
4 stars
30
24%
3 stars
25
20%
2 stars
7
6%
1 star
16
13%
 
Total votes: 125

User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by stip »

Agreed. Maybe this can help rebuild the bridge that martha burned.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Mine »

harmless wrote:
Mine wrote: I agree with all of this. I'm not trying to argue about what they should or should not record. I however believe that the most bitching/10C membership revoking fans do equate heavy/deep with hard/loud. I may be generalising and exaggerating but i don't think it affects the point I'm trying to make in a relevant manner.
That may be true, I'm not sure. But I'm not finding that on RM. Here, the people who are most disappointed with the new stuff tend to be those that love the middle period, specifically Binaural and Riot Act. Very little of that material was as heavy as the early stuff, and that period was really when PJ had come into their own as an acoustic band, among plenty of other things. What they want is the depth and creativity.
I wasn't talking about RM definitely not the regular posters. Sadly RM isn't very representative of the majority of music listeners or PJ fans for that matter. And it's not about overanalysing but about having an above average interest and consequentially knowledge of music in it's various aspects.
To go back to my original post the only thing i believe they should do from now on is do whatever the fuck they want because no matter what they do it will always be considered awful shit by some people/fans/reviewers whatever and is been like this forever to the point there's this whole mythology about their post Vitalogy studio output that isn't that far away from a respectable conspiracy theory. Just look about all those posts by people who refuse to acknowledge someone could genuinely like Riot Act. Mostly trolls or similar but still. There isn't a way for them to age gracefully, be cool or whatever generally speaking even if you and i may agree on what that would be it's irrelevant at the end of the day. If you think about it they could have aged so much worst it's not even funny.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85154
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by epilogue »

stip wrote:Agreed. Maybe this can help rebuild the bridge that martha burned.
:heartbeat:
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote: I agree with all of this. I'm not trying to argue about what they should or should not record. I however believe that the most bitching/10C membership revoking fans do equate heavy/deep with hard/loud. I may be generalising and exaggerating but i don't think it affects the point I'm trying to make in a relevant manner.
That may be true, I'm not sure. But I'm not finding that on RM. Here, the people who are most disappointed with the new stuff tend to be those that love the middle period, specifically Binaural and Riot Act. Very little of that material was as heavy as the early stuff, and that period was really when PJ had come into their own as an acoustic band, among plenty of other things. What they want is the depth and creativity.
I wasn't talking about RM definitely not the regular posters. Sadly RM isn't very representative of the majority of music listeners or PJ fans for that matter. And it's not about overanalysing but about having an above average interest and consequentially knowledge of music in it's various aspects.
To go back to my original post the only thing i believe they should do from now on is do whatever the fuck they want because no matter what they do it will always be considered awful shit by some people/fans/reviewers whatever and is been like this forever to the point there's this whole mythology about their post Vitalogy studio output that isn't that far away from a respectable conspiracy theory. Just look about all those posts by people who refuse to acknowledge someone could genuinely like Riot Act. Mostly trolls or similar but still. There isn't a way for them to age gracefully, be cool or whatever generally speaking even if you and i may agree on what that would be it's irrelevant at the end of the day. If you think about it they could have aged so much worst it's not even funny.
Yeah, I agree with this. We're not all going to be happy, whatever they do. I'm OK being content, I guess, and I'm happy to not feel like I have to jump ship.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

durdencommatyler wrote:
stip wrote:Agreed. Maybe this can help rebuild the bridge that martha burned.
:heartbeat:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
13inlet
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon September 09, 2013 2:42 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by 13inlet »

Just in case anyone wants to learn this tune. I posted a cover on YouTube, you should be able to make the chords out, but if not I can help... just PM me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB2hCHuF ... e=youtu.be
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Mine »

harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote: I agree with all of this. I'm not trying to argue about what they should or should not record. I however believe that the most bitching/10C membership revoking fans do equate heavy/deep with hard/loud. I may be generalising and exaggerating but i don't think it affects the point I'm trying to make in a relevant manner.
That may be true, I'm not sure. But I'm not finding that on RM. Here, the people who are most disappointed with the new stuff tend to be those that love the middle period, specifically Binaural and Riot Act. Very little of that material was as heavy as the early stuff, and that period was really when PJ had come into their own as an acoustic band, among plenty of other things. What they want is the depth and creativity.
I wasn't talking about RM definitely not the regular posters. Sadly RM isn't very representative of the majority of music listeners or PJ fans for that matter. And it's not about overanalysing but about having an above average interest and consequentially knowledge of music in it's various aspects.
To go back to my original post the only thing i believe they should do from now on is do whatever the fuck they want because no matter what they do it will always be considered awful shit by some people/fans/reviewers whatever and is been like this forever to the point there's this whole mythology about their post Vitalogy studio output that isn't that far away from a respectable conspiracy theory. Just look about all those posts by people who refuse to acknowledge someone could genuinely like Riot Act. Mostly trolls or similar but still. There isn't a way for them to age gracefully, be cool or whatever generally speaking even if you and i may agree on what that would be it's irrelevant at the end of the day. If you think about it they could have aged so much worst it's not even funny.
Yeah, I agree with this. We're not all going to be happy, whatever they do. I'm OK being content, I guess, and I'm happy to not feel like I have to jump ship.
I think that reputation of putting out records that feel, as Ed would put it, like homework to listen to is something that may be bothering them at this point and may have some influence on their post RA music. At the very least i can imagine them not being ok with a reputation like that and it seems to be implied in many introduction to reviews of their records.
I think Sony made that up around No Code and it stuck. I find it realistic enough that a label like Epic makes shit like this up to hype their records especially at a point in a career like PJ's was at the time.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Mine »

oh and about ageing gracefully

Image
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

Jeff looks really fucking cool whatever he does.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4663
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Self »

Man, reversed headstocks really bring me back to a dark place.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Mine »

The whole pic is cool in all honesty.
User avatar
WtOB?
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 7:03 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/humdinger_dman
Location: by the ocean
Contact:

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by WtOB? »

harmless wrote:Jeff looks really fucking cool whatever he does.
he's basically black.
Dev wrote:i love listening to the leaked pj song "last word".
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

WtOB? wrote:
harmless wrote:Jeff looks really fucking cool whatever he does.
he's basically black.
Yeah. In a contest of cool, that picture beats headbanging Ed hands down.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Mine »

Not this again! :roll:
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

Well I wasn't the one who brought it back up.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Mine »

i was kidding
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

:thumbsup:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Juvenal
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 929
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:31 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Juvenal »

I reckon Jeff has the biggest cock in the band.
stip wrote:I wanted to punch you in your god's dice loving balls for not loving lightning bolt.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Birds in Hell »

Juvenal wrote:I reckon Jeff has the biggest cock in the band.
"Sex on legs."
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by dimejinky99 »

Abomchickawahwah
Calibrate your enthusiasm
Post Reply