Red Mosquito

Mirella wrote:

blueviper wrote:

gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8

Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?

Moi.

I was wondering when that would be debunked.

That is plain mean Maybe you can go and post on the Bugs mailinglist Facebook page and apologise for it. Link is in my sig.

groetjes,
Mirella

Yikes! Sorry! All in good fun!

blueviper wrote:

Mirella wrote:

blueviper wrote:

gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8

Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?

Moi.

I was wondering when that would be debunked.

That is plain mean Maybe you can go and post on the Bugs mailinglist Facebook page and apologise for it. Link is in my sig.

groetjes,
Mirella

Yikes! Sorry! All in good fun!

I think the hall of fame is just one of those things Eddie is goofy about cause a bunch of his heroes are in there.

Was that interview from yesterday definitely fake? How the hell were the photos pulled off? And damn thats a lot of effort. Had eddies voice down though.

He's pretty reverent of the stuff he likes. I'm sure the concept of a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame runs right up his alley....just as I'm sure he doesn't really look all that closely at the process or organization.

I haven't looked in a long time...maybe Suzan Evans stepped down. That would help a lot.

There are a lot of quotes like this from current and former board members floating around out there:

"At one point (in 1999) Suzan Evans lamented the choices being made because there weren't enough big names that would sell tickets to the dinner. That was quickly remedied by dropping one of the doo-wop groups being considered in favor of a 'name' artist."

blueviper wrote:

gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8

Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?

Moi.

I was wondering when that would be debunked.

so they arent gonna be on letterman?

So this wasn't a fake afterall?

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... s-20130927

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

blueviper wrote:

gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8

Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?

Moi.

I was wondering when that would be debunked.

so they arent gonna be on letterman?

Man some people have way too much time on their hands...

McParadigm wrote:He's pretty reverent of the stuff he likes. I'm sure the concept of a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame runs right up his alley....just as I'm sure he doesn't really look all that closely at the process or organization.

I haven't looked in a long time...maybe Suzan Evans stepped down. That would help a lot.

There are a lot of quotes like this from current and former board members floating around out there:

"At one point (in 1999) Suzan Evans lamented the choices being made because there weren't enough big names that would sell tickets to the dinner. That was quickly remedied by dropping one of the doo-wop groups being considered in favor of a 'name' artist."

Not surprising in the least. I actually had no idea how big of a deal it was or that people looked up to it till after I got into pearl jam and saw all the inductions ed did, I'm pretty sure its never been on tv in England of anything.

Thurman Murman wrote:So this wasn't a fake afterall?

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... s-20130927

Ha!

Thurman Murman wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

blueviper wrote:

gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8

Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?

Moi.

I was wondering when that would be debunked.

so they arent gonna be on letterman?

Man some people have way too much time on their hands...

How long do you think it really takes?

Thejambi wrote:

Thurman Murman wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

blueviper wrote:

gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8

Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?

Moi.

I was wondering when that would be debunked.

so they arent gonna be on letterman?

Man some people have way too much time on their hands...

How long do you think it really takes?

More time than i'd be willing to spend on it.

Thurman Murman wrote:So this wasn't a fake afterall?

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... s-20130927

What is going on here godammit.

The Lightning Bolt is playing havoc with the Internets.

harmless wrote:The Lightning Bolt is playing havoc with the Internets.

well lightning bolts are bad for computers, so it makes sense

Thurman Murman wrote:

Thejambi wrote:

Thurman Murman wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

blueviper wrote:

gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8

Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?

Moi.

I was wondering when that would be debunked.

so they arent gonna be on letterman?

Man some people have way too much time on their hands...

How long do you think it really takes?

More time than i'd be willing to spend on it.

You're right, sandwiches are a much better use of time.

Thejambi wrote:

Thurman Murman wrote:

Thejambi wrote:

Thurman Murman wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

blueviper wrote:

gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8

Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?

Moi.

I was wondering when that would be debunked.

so they arent gonna be on letterman?

Man some people have way too much time on their hands...

How long do you think it really takes?

More time than i'd be willing to spend on it.

You're right, sandwiches are a much better use of time.

i like sandwiches

Thejambi wrote:

Thurman Murman wrote:

Thejambi wrote:

Thurman Murman wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

blueviper wrote:

gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8

Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?

Moi.

I was wondering when that would be debunked.

so they arent gonna be on letterman?

Man some people have way too much time on their hands...

How long do you think it really takes?

More time than i'd be willing to spend on it.

You're right, sandwiches are a much better use of time.

blueviper wrote:

Mirella wrote:

blueviper wrote:

gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8

Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?

Moi.

I was wondering when that would be debunked.

That is plain mean Maybe you can go and post on the Bugs mailinglist Facebook page and apologise for it. Link is in my sig.

groetjes,
Mirella

Yikes! Sorry! All in good fun!

Now the only thing you can do to make up for this is make them play there on the 8th

groetjes,
Mirella (we got lots of visitors because of that 'news', so it's all good)

Strat wrote:

Thurman Murman wrote:So this wasn't a fake afterall?

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... s-20130927

What is going on here godammit.

Basically eddies manner of speaking is so bizzare that its possible to convince yourself 'no way he'd say that' everytime he opens his mouth?

Hot air balloons! Crop circles! Fructose! I love it.

Strat wrote:

Thurman Murman wrote:So this wasn't a fake afterall?

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... s-20130927

What is going on here godammit.

I"m very confused...haha... but thats common....

He's more forthcoming in that interview than any of them have been for a while. He's unapologetic about taking longer with records, he admits to courting sentimentality now, screw what anyone says about it... good to know he's still that self-aware really.