Re: 10th album rumors and speculation
Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 2:18 am
gardenparty wrote:a few pages back someone mentioned the person to be keeping tabs on was Brendan O'Brien. anybody know what he's up to? let's go talk to him.
gardenparty wrote:a few pages back someone mentioned the person to be keeping tabs on was Brendan O'Brien. anybody know what he's up to? let's go talk to him.
we dont joke around with these things.WtOB? wrote:Oh I get it.. you're both kidding.VinylGuy wrote:WtOB? wrote:It didn't have a bad reception among the fan base? Have you read this board? Also have you checked the pit lately? They dislike Backspacer almost as much as us these days. They had a rank the albums thread recently and almost all the posters had Backspacer in the bottom 2.theplatypus wrote:Probably not. Backspacer didn't really have a bad reception, commercially, critically or among the fan base.
Platypus is right. It sure didnt have a bad reception.
They made good records when half the band didn't like the music they were making. In the moment they started caring about not pissing each other off their albums started to be boring. They went from releasing albums that polarised their fan base to albums that have most of the fan base in agreement that their recent output leaves a lot to be desired.harmless wrote:The thing is, I'm just constantly annoyed (I won't stretch to 'disappointed' as I'm pretty used to it by now) that this band never sounds excited about their forthcoming songs anymore. "Oh yeah, we wrote this thing, it's rock, it's got a cool groove, I hope people will like it." I mean, these people have been musicians for decades. Where is the passion? WHAT WILL THE SONG BE ABOUT? WHAT ARE THIS ALBUM'S THEMES? Where do PJ see their music going, what influences them and excites them now? We never hear anything detailed about their art anymore, to the extent that I'm almost certain they're just bored of it. Do they honestly think references to punk and Pink Floyd are going to have us salivating?
That'll be the fixin'.Got Some wrote:Interesting its gone from "experimental" to "it's sounds like pearl jam".
Here is a brief interview with Stone in February of 1996:harmless wrote:One of the things I used to love most about this band was that their albums usually had a tight, unified concept to them, particularly (for example) Vitalogy, No Code, Yield. You could talk about how those albums were composed as a complete piece of work for ever, and we have done on this site. Maybe it's retrospect that allows it; I don't know, did PJ talk about those so blandly? I'm not sure.
And then you hear "Stand Up Comedy."Tuolumne wrote:I think it's a Seattle scene thing to not over-hype albums. It's so cliche that bands pump their new albums that I think it's one of those frowned upon things over there. It does appear really disingenuise when you follow follow a band and each time they come out with a record they go, "last album was okay, but THIS one is the best ever!". However, I do kind of envy like U2's fanbase when Bono will come out and say something like "I dare anyone to make a better album than ours", I gotta admit when you hear your guy say that it must really get you pumped.........
evenslow wrote: I'm going to generalize b/c it's true: The long wait in between albums has caused RM's psyche to split. We've moved so far to the extremes to uncover new shit to talk about that there is no longer any new shit to talk about. Pearl Jam has been vivisected. RM has eaten itself.
The worst part is this happened like a year ago and we're still chugging on fumes. Thank Christ for Moonlander.
I'm scared to see what's next.Tuolumne wrote:evenslow wrote: I'm going to generalize b/c it's true: The long wait in between albums has caused RM's psyche to split. We've moved so far to the extremes to uncover new shit to talk about that there is no longer any new shit to talk about. Pearl Jam has been vivisected. RM has eaten itself.
The worst part is this happened like a year ago and we're still chugging on fumes. Thank Christ for Moonlander.
Most true thing ever, you speak the truth.
I'd argue that, on top of eating itself, RM has shit everything out and eaten the shit again, resulting in massive verbal diarreah, which is where we're at right now.
Most of the board was ecstatic about Backspacer when it came out. It was received well. That's what the word "reception" means: how it was received, not where it stands after being processed over a period of four years of relative inactivity.WtOB? wrote:It just took them longer to realise it sucked cos they're a little slow.
Water go to the water, water go to the cupTuolumne wrote:evenslow wrote: I'm going to generalize b/c it's true: The long wait in between albums has caused RM's psyche to split. We've moved so far to the extremes to uncover new shit to talk about that there is no longer any new shit to talk about. Pearl Jam has been vivisected. RM has eaten itself.
The worst part is this happened like a year ago and we're still chugging on fumes. Thank Christ for Moonlander.
Most true thing ever, you speak the truth.
I'd argue that, on top of eating itself, RM has shit everything out and eaten the shit again, resulting in massive verbal diarreah, which is where we're at right now.
great post. And the "inactivity" part too....i really want more new music from them, but to say they were inactive all these years...theplatypus wrote:Most of the board was ecstatic about Backspacer when it came out. It was received well. That's what the word "reception" means: how it was received, not where it stands after being processed over a period of four years of relative inactivity.WtOB? wrote:It just took them longer to realise it sucked cos they're a little slow.
If the goal here was to make me retch like a forsaken sailor on a raft in the high seas, mission accomplished.theplatypus wrote:Water go to the water, water go to the cupTuolumne wrote:evenslow wrote: I'm going to generalize b/c it's true: The long wait in between albums has caused RM's psyche to split. We've moved so far to the extremes to uncover new shit to talk about that there is no longer any new shit to talk about. Pearl Jam has been vivisected. RM has eaten itself.
The worst part is this happened like a year ago and we're still chugging on fumes. Thank Christ for Moonlander.
Most true thing ever, you speak the truth.
I'd argue that, on top of eating itself, RM has shit everything out and eaten the shit again, resulting in massive verbal diarreah, which is where we're at right now.
Cup go to the stomach, shit come out the butt
Shit go in the water, water go in the cup
Shit go down the stomach, shit come out the butt
Shit go in the water, water go in the cup
Cup go to the thirsty, shit go to the stomach
Blood come out the butt, blood go in the water
Water go in the cup, cup go to the tongue
Shit blood in the stomach, shit blood in the mouth
Shit blood on the insides, water come out the butt
Oh goddamnit no !McCready added that there might be a few of his compositions that will make the cut for the new album
People are still processing backspacer? I thought it was left for dead by now. It was received well, if by received well you mean people tried to convince themselves it was good after the first couple of listens.VinylGuy wrote:great post. And the "inactivity" part too....i really want more new music from them, but to say they were inactive all these years...theplatypus wrote:Most of the board was ecstatic about Backspacer when it came out. It was received well. That's what the word "reception" means: how it was received, not where it stands after being processed over a period of four years of relative inactivity.WtOB? wrote:It just took them longer to realise it sucked cos they're a little slow.
yeah, but my opinion counts as much as the opinion of up to 6 mortal men.BurtReynolds wrote:People are still processing backspacer? I thought it was left for dead by now. It was received well, if by received well you mean people tried to convince themselves it was good after the first couple of listens.VinylGuy wrote:great post. And the "inactivity" part too....i really want more new music from them, but to say they were inactive all these years...theplatypus wrote:Most of the board was ecstatic about Backspacer when it came out. It was received well. That's what the word "reception" means: how it was received, not where it stands after being processed over a period of four years of relative inactivity.WtOB? wrote:It just took them longer to realise it sucked cos they're a little slow.
Stip excluded obviously.
stip wrote:yeah, but my opinion counts as much as the opinion of up to 6 mortal men.BurtReynolds wrote:People are still processing backspacer? I thought it was left for dead by now. It was received well, if by received well you mean people tried to convince themselves it was good after the first couple of listens.VinylGuy wrote:great post. And the "inactivity" part too....i really want more new music from them, but to say they were inactive all these years...theplatypus wrote:Most of the board was ecstatic about Backspacer when it came out. It was received well. That's what the word "reception" means: how it was received, not where it stands after being processed over a period of four years of relative inactivity.WtOB? wrote:It just took them longer to realise it sucked cos they're a little slow.
Stip excluded obviously.