Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Posted: Sat September 28, 2013 2:47 pm
Strat wrote:harmless wrote:Yeah, he really must've needed a coffee after that one.McParadigm wrote:He arduously wrote Future Days.
Or an HJ

Strat wrote:harmless wrote:Yeah, he really must've needed a coffee after that one.McParadigm wrote:He arduously wrote Future Days.
Or an HJ

bad thingharmless wrote:The file is not available for download anymore, but this was a pleasing summary:
"Because their lives are busier with other obligations, songwriting has to be done a little faster or they just have to find ways to produce things in shorter time frames. Backspacer was recorded quickly and they were happy with it, but he acknowledged that quick records might eventually suffer from poor quality."
But is he saying that drop in quality would be a bad thing, or an OK thing as needs must?
I think soft would be fine if it didn't also sound so shiny. You either need shiny heavy stuff or low-fi soft stuff.McParadigm wrote:I actually think it would be straight up badass if they would write a song a'la Neil's Walk On...a sort of messagey self-aware "yeah, we know some people arent gonna get it, but..." track.harmless wrote:I agree, I think that's what I'm saying. They're just a rock band and probably find it refreshing to be able to do what they want, even if people don't like it. But as they get older, what they want to be looks more and more like a classic rock band with fewer experiments and surprises.
but their's would be about how they write what they feel, and that's gonna mean soft pop music and old people stuff sometimes, and tough shit.
Since songwriting is arduous, We can brainstorm lyrics for them.
I fell in love
on and off
with the sound
of something soft.
They left it hanging
on a cross.
I took it down,
and brushed it off.
Etc.
Phew.evenslow wrote:bad thingharmless wrote:The file is not available for download anymore, but this was a pleasing summary:
"Because their lives are busier with other obligations, songwriting has to be done a little faster or they just have to find ways to produce things in shorter time frames. Backspacer was recorded quickly and they were happy with it, but he acknowledged that quick records might eventually suffer from poor quality."
But is he saying that drop in quality would be a bad thing, or an OK thing as needs must?
Lostdog wrote:A casi 15 días del estreno y aún no se filtra....
The question is how are they perceived in any corner really? Even if they tried to get some sort of feedback from their fan base like reading trough message boards it's not like they'd get anywhere. It's not like there's consensus about anything.evenslow wrote:In general, these dudes are way more self aware than some on RM give them credit for. Music has been their life and they think about it constantly. They may not always know how they're perceived in certain corners, but I guarantee they understand how their work and song writing process fits into the larger context of their career. It is their career, after all.
Mine wrote:The question is how are they perceived in any corner really? Even if they tried to get some sort of feedback from their fan base like reading trough message boards it's not like they'd get anywhere. It's not like there's consensus about anything.evenslow wrote:In general, these dudes are way more self aware than some on RM give them credit for. Music has been their life and they think about it constantly. They may not always know how they're perceived in certain corners, but I guarantee they understand how their work and song writing process fits into the larger context of their career. It is their career, after all.
This is the kind of thing fans say when they're really happy with the music...guitar_davey wrote:Mine wrote:The question is how are they perceived in any corner really? Even if they tried to get some sort of feedback from their fan base like reading trough message boards it's not like they'd get anywhere. It's not like there's consensus about anything.evenslow wrote:In general, these dudes are way more self aware than some on RM give them credit for. Music has been their life and they think about it constantly. They may not always know how they're perceived in certain corners, but I guarantee they understand how their work and song writing process fits into the larger context of their career. It is their career, after all.
I would hope they give zero consideration to the fanbase when they write.
Step one: have all the members be fans of the band.harmless wrote:This is the kind of thing fans say when they're really happy with the music...guitar_davey wrote:Mine wrote:The question is how are they perceived in any corner really? Even if they tried to get some sort of feedback from their fan base like reading trough message boards it's not like they'd get anywhere. It's not like there's consensus about anything.evenslow wrote:In general, these dudes are way more self aware than some on RM give them credit for. Music has been their life and they think about it constantly. They may not always know how they're perceived in certain corners, but I guarantee they understand how their work and song writing process fits into the larger context of their career. It is their career, after all.
I would hope they give zero consideration to the fanbase when they write.
Thejambi wrote:Step one: have all the members be fans of the band.harmless wrote:This is the kind of thing fans say when they're really happy with the music...guitar_davey wrote:Mine wrote:The question is how are they perceived in any corner really? Even if they tried to get some sort of feedback from their fan base like reading trough message boards it's not like they'd get anywhere. It's not like there's consensus about anything.evenslow wrote:In general, these dudes are way more self aware than some on RM give them credit for. Music has been their life and they think about it constantly. They may not always know how they're perceived in certain corners, but I guarantee they understand how their work and song writing process fits into the larger context of their career. It is their career, after all.
I would hope they give zero consideration to the fanbase when they write.
harmless wrote:Anyway, what I'm hearing from Lightning Bolt is that they might be moving away from the songwriting approach that I wasn't keen on, towards something a bit more weighty. So that's good and I'm happy with that. The best thing LB could've done is make me interested in where PJ goes next, and it's definitely done that.
I bet it got him oneStrat wrote:harmless wrote:Yeah, he really must've needed a coffee after that one.McParadigm wrote:He arduously wrote Future Days.
Or an HJ
Which I guess I am. I'm amazed to degree to which things get analysed here. "Song A is a 4.5, but the cymbal crash (which Dave A would have nailed) in the third chorus is a 2.5." I guess I just enjoy what I enjoy. I log in here and I'm always staggered by what the issue of the moment seems to be.Thejambi wrote:Step one: have all the members be fans of the band.harmless wrote:This is the kind of thing fans say when they're really happy with the music...guitar_davey wrote:Mine wrote:The question is how are they perceived in any corner really? Even if they tried to get some sort of feedback from their fan base like reading trough message boards it's not like they'd get anywhere. It's not like there's consensus about anything.evenslow wrote:In general, these dudes are way more self aware than some on RM give them credit for. Music has been their life and they think about it constantly. They may not always know how they're perceived in certain corners, but I guarantee they understand how their work and song writing process fits into the larger context of their career. It is their career, after all.
I would hope they give zero consideration to the fanbase when they write.
To be fair, whenever someone criticises the apparently trivial complaints we make on RM, they tend to make them even more trivial to make their point. If anyone's complaints are unreasonable you just need to quote oneguitar_davey wrote:Which I guess I am. I'm amazed to degree to which things get analysed here. "Song A is a 4.5, but the cymbal crash (which Dave A would have nailed) in the third chorus is a 2.5." I guess I just enjoy what I enjoy. I log in here and I'm always staggered by what the issue of the moment seems to be.Thejambi wrote:Step one: have all the members be fans of the band.harmless wrote:This is the kind of thing fans say when they're really happy with the music...guitar_davey wrote:Mine wrote:The question is how are they perceived in any corner really? Even if they tried to get some sort of feedback from their fan base like reading trough message boards it's not like they'd get anywhere. It's not like there's consensus about anything.evenslow wrote:In general, these dudes are way more self aware than some on RM give them credit for. Music has been their life and they think about it constantly. They may not always know how they're perceived in certain corners, but I guarantee they understand how their work and song writing process fits into the larger context of their career. It is their career, after all.
I would hope they give zero consideration to the fanbase when they write.