Re: Adventures in Babysitting: The Catch-All Anti-SJW Thread
Posted: Thu October 20, 2022 11:35 pm
We should test legalized sex work in one state and see how it goes.
is it appropriate to talk about slippery slopes?BurtReynolds wrote:No way! But then again I don't have to pretend that sucking dick for money is respectable, dignified work either, or that the industrialization of sex won't have massive consequences that none of us really know about.spike wrote:Should anything be illegal?
Cartman voice - "If we save her, I'm going to take off her pants and play Slip 'N Slide"Ms Harmless wrote:is it appropriate to talk about slippery slopes?BurtReynolds wrote:No way! But then again I don't have to pretend that sucking dick for money is respectable, dignified work either, or that the industrialization of sex won't have massive consequences that none of us really know about.spike wrote:Should anything be illegal?
Would surely be a brave new worldBurtReynolds wrote:No way! But then again I don't have to pretend that sucking dick for money is respectable, dignified work either, or that the industrialization of sex won't have massive consequences that none of us really know about.spike wrote:Should anything be illegal?
Both are undignified, but since when does a job have to be dignified?McParadigm wrote:Is sucking a dick undignified? Or is it the act of getting paid?
I suppose if you hate markets, you don't see the difference in this and other markets. They all suck.4/5 wrote:Such a weird discussion.
The people who don't like markets: it's just another market transaction!
The person in the discussion who most supports markets: this specific trade can't be allowed!
Well, virtually nobody actually supports unregulated markets, including people who support markets being as free as possible.B wrote:I suppose if you hate markets, you don't see the difference in this and other markets. They all suck.4/5 wrote:Such a weird discussion.
The people who don't like markets: it's just another market transaction!
The person in the discussion who most supports markets: this specific trade can't be allowed!
If you support unregulated markets, you're full of shit, and this discussion shines a light on that.
yeah thisB wrote:I suppose if you hate markets, you don't see the difference in this and other markets. They all suck.4/5 wrote:Such a weird discussion.
The people who don't like markets: it's just another market transaction!
The person in the discussion who most supports markets: this specific trade can't be allowed!
If you support unregulated markets, you're full of shit, and this discussion shines a light on that.
resources aren't scarce, though; they're distributed unfairly4/5 wrote:Well, virtually nobody actually supports unregulated markets, including people who support markets being as free as possible.B wrote:I suppose if you hate markets, you don't see the difference in this and other markets. They all suck.4/5 wrote:Such a weird discussion.
The people who don't like markets: it's just another market transaction!
The person in the discussion who most supports markets: this specific trade can't be allowed!
If you support unregulated markets, you're full of shit, and this discussion shines a light on that.
And if you think that all markets suck, then so be it I suppose. But the next question should be, In comparison to what? This isn't the thread for this obviously, but again even the biggest proponents of markets don't claim that they are perfect, but rather that they are preferable other methods of making decisions and allocating scarce resources.
It's only worth so much money because supply is constrained relative to demand. Release the supply and you'll get:B wrote:That's why it's worth so much money.

The 13th Amendment agrees with this.4/5 wrote:Such a weird discussion.
The people who don't like markets: it's just another market transaction!
The person in the discussion who most supports markets: this specific trade can't be allowed!