Red Mosquito

evenslow wrote:

harmless wrote:

bodysnatcher wrote:every time i see the "new post" icon illuminated for this thread, about 2% of me is excited that someone actually has posted new information on the album. i live in constant disappointment on this board.

Me too, bodysnatcher. Me too.

I'm not sure what it's going to take for the two a youz to lower your expectations at this point. Maybe when we get to 200 pages you'll see this thread for what it really is: a swampy morass masterminded by Boom to slowly eat away at Pearl Jam's fanbase, leading to band breakup and finally Eddie all to himself on a quiet Hawaiian atoll.

But only 0.5% of the fanbase. You know, to be exact and all.

bodysnatcher wrote:every time i see the "new post" icon illuminated for this thread, about 2% of me is excited that someone actually has posted new information on the album. i live in constant disappointment on this board.

I feel the same way... but it is not in anticipation of new album news. I keep hoping that we get another run of 80s movies pictures.

Tuolumne wrote:

evenslow wrote:

harmless wrote:

bodysnatcher wrote:every time i see the "new post" icon illuminated for this thread, about 2% of me is excited that someone actually has posted new information on the album. i live in constant disappointment on this board.

Me too, bodysnatcher. Me too.

I'm not sure what it's going to take for the two a youz to lower your expectations at this point. Maybe when we get to 200 pages you'll see this thread for what it really is: a swampy morass masterminded by Boom to slowly eat away at Pearl Jam's fanbase, leading to band breakup and finally Eddie all to himself on a quiet Hawaiian atoll.

But only 0.5% of the fanbase. You know, to be exact and all.

evenslow wrote:

harmless wrote:

bodysnatcher wrote:every time i see the "new post" icon illuminated for this thread, about 2% of me is excited that someone actually has posted new information on the album. i live in constant disappointment on this board.

Me too, bodysnatcher. Me too.

I'm not sure what it's going to take for the two a youz to lower your expectations at this point. Maybe when we get to 200 pages you'll see this thread for what it really is: a swampy morass masterminded by Boom to slowly eat away at Pearl Jam's fanbase, leading to band breakup and finally Eddie all to himself on a quiet Hawaiian atoll.

CAN'T YOU SEE, THIS IS ALL I'VE EVER WANTED

This has absolutely nothing to do with PJ, but I found it an interesting read. I posted this in the NIN nails thread in the music forum, but not sure how many people would read that thread.... the part that really stuck out to me, and reminded me of recent conversation on this website pertaining to PJ, is the next to last paragraph

http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/7/430845 ... ontroversy

and the accompanying blog post from Sheridan:

http://robsheridan.tumblr.com/post/4978 ... a-thing-of

RELATED TO THREAD TITLE (-ISH)

When interviewed recently by Seattle's KIRO, the DJ said (and I'm paraphrasing) that he had previously told Mike that Backspacer was among his favorite Pearl Jam records. He then said that Mike replied the new one was going to be "even better." Then Mike chimed in, clarifying to "way better."

Also said, he's "been told by the powers that be I can't say anything about it yet because we are just mixing it right now... we don't have a date for it yet, but know that it's going to be WAY better than Backspacer, I think... I'm very happy about it."

So there you have it, book it, take it to the bank. Mike stresses the new album is going to be "way better" than Backspacer - he said this twice, with emphasis on the "way". On some level, he must agree with the criticism, no?

WE WIN - NEW ALBUM BEING MIXED AS WE SPEAK - MIKE THINKS WAY BETTER THAN BACKSPACER - DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN

Listen for yourself towards end of interview: http://www.kiroradio.com/listen/9955770/#

It's being mixed?? Well...so this is getting closer....

Listened to the interview...and whoever said in this thread that they are not showing much enthusiasm should listen to it aswell. Mike is very very excited and thinks is WAY, WAY better than Backspacer...

How long does mixing take? when was backspacer mixed? I hope the reason why Mike thinks its better than BS is because he has more solos.....

maybe he meant 'fixed'

bodysnatcher wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:Those descriptions and Stone's 'it sounds like a pearl jam record' statement leave me worried. 2.5 ed acoustic based numbers, 2.5 garage punk numbers etc. you get the drift.
Are PJ records becoming as formulaic as some of their set lists?

it's statements like Mike's and Stone's that make me believe that all that analysis of album themes and narrative are moot points.

At this point I'd be inclined to agree with you. Most statements by band members in the run up to previous releases have been hyperbolic, at best. They're best ignored at this stage.

That sounds jaded and I'm not but if I can avoid getting excited, then it shouldn't matter when I hear it. I know I will be when it arrives.

Late September and before the fall dates is the latest rumour. Lets hope.

Backspacer came out the day before my birthday (whether you think that's a good birthday present or not). It'd be cool for it to happen again with this one.

evenslow wrote: ..."been told by the powers that be I can't say anything about it yet because we are just mixing it right now...

"How's the new album coming along, Mike?"
"Dude, I just work here."

I'm glad Mike seems excited about the new material. The last few years haven't exactly been the apex of my Pearl Jam fandom but I'm looking forward to checking out the new record.

Guys, I'm looking through the posts from when Backspacer first leaked. It's so funny reading everyone freaking out trying to get their hands on it. Can't wait for the chaos when this one leaks.

Pink floyd vibe

https://vine.co/v/b2Px66xx6Tl

evenslow wrote:RELATED TO THREAD TITLE (-ISH)

LOL.

Way better probably means that he wasn't told to make patterns and plan out his solos by Brendan. He's also pretty clear that the band can't go into too much detail yet which explains the lack of detail to date.

Overall, pretty excited about this.

Kevin Davis wrote:

harmless wrote:One of the things I used to love most about this band was that their albums usually had a tight, unified concept to them, particularly (for example) Vitalogy, No Code, Yield. You could talk about how those albums were composed as a complete piece of work for ever, and we have done on this site. Maybe it's retrospect that allows it; I don't know, did PJ talk about those so blandly? I'm not sure.

Here is a brief interview with Stone in February of 1996:
http://pearljamhistory.no.sapo.pt/PJArt ... _noise.htm

And here is Ed and Jeff talking a little bit about Yield, a few months pre-release.
http://pearljamhistory.no.sapo.pt/PJArt ... new_lp.htm

The tone of the interviews is a little different, but overall I don't think they're really giving a whole lot more information than they give now. To me the really telling thing is when Stone says they're "just starting" in a February interview for a record that got released that August.

Here's the archive from which I got the two pieces above:
http://pearljamhistory.no.sapo.pt/PJArt ... rviews.htm

Jeff wrote:"It's just the way we choose to work. Some bands are in your face all the time," he said. "In videos, magazines, McDonald's ads, whatever, but then they'll only put out an album every three years or so. We put out a record every year or year and a half. So it's a question of what do you want to end up with every three years or so -- 30 songs or 10 songs and all the other stuff?"

B wrote:

https://vine.co/v/b2Px66xx6Tl

wtf?

Or I certainly am...

WtOB? wrote:

B wrote:

https://vine.co/v/b2Px66xx6Tl

wtf?

Or I certainly am...

that's our boy Vedder' voice right?

mastaflatch wrote:

WtOB? wrote:

B wrote:

https://vine.co/v/b2Px66xx6Tl

wtf?

Or I certainly am...

that's our boy Vedder' voice right?

Can't tell. But whatever he's listening to, it's track 8.