Re: MLB
Posted: Mon May 26, 2014 2:03 pm
I mean, they were only chirping at him from the dugout. Escobar is the one that pulled the "hold me back, bro."
They don't like it? They want to stand up for themselves? Then play better baseball.philpritchard wrote:You can't really blame them. Everyone's been picking on them lately, and they were just standing up for themselves.Harry Lime wrote:I see that the defending champs were acting like a bunch of cry babies.
Boston: "While you're on second base, we're not going to hold you on and we're going to set up our defense in a way that makes it obvious we're not even pretending that we're trying to get you out."numbers wrote:I mean, they were only chirping at him from the dugout. Escobar is the one that pulled the "hold me back, bro."
obviously it was stupid, but the Red Sox have lost 10 in a row, just blew the game, and have a history with the DRays. It's not surprising.philpritchard wrote:Boston: "While you're on second base, we're not going to hold you on and we're going to set up our defense in a way that makes it obvious we're not even pretending that we're trying to get you out."numbers wrote:I mean, they were only chirping at him from the dugout. Escobar is the one that pulled the "hold me back, bro."
Escobar: *steals third*
Boston: "YOU SON OF A BITCH!"
Even chirping at him from the dugout was stupid, given the circumstances. It's like throwing fastballs down the middle of the plate and then getting pissed off when someone hits a homerun. It was a five run game with two innings to play. It wasn't even a "don't run up the score" situation.
I'm curious... are people in Boston viewing this as some kind of turning point where a show of emotion turns the season around?numbers wrote:obviously it was stupid, but the Red Sox have lost 10 in a row, just blew the game, and have a history with the DRays. It's not surprising.philpritchard wrote:Boston: "While you're on second base, we're not going to hold you on and we're going to set up our defense in a way that makes it obvious we're not even pretending that we're trying to get you out."numbers wrote:I mean, they were only chirping at him from the dugout. Escobar is the one that pulled the "hold me back, bro."
Escobar: *steals third*
Boston: "YOU SON OF A BITCH!"
Even chirping at him from the dugout was stupid, given the circumstances. It's like throwing fastballs down the middle of the plate and then getting pissed off when someone hits a homerun. It was a five run game with two innings to play. It wasn't even a "don't run up the score" situation.
The local media is trying to sell that angle, but I dont view it that way.philpritchard wrote:I'm curious... are people in Boston viewing this as some kind of turning point where a show of emotion turns the season around?numbers wrote:obviously it was stupid, but the Red Sox have lost 10 in a row, just blew the game, and have a history with the DRays. It's not surprising.philpritchard wrote:Boston: "While you're on second base, we're not going to hold you on and we're going to set up our defense in a way that makes it obvious we're not even pretending that we're trying to get you out."numbers wrote:I mean, they were only chirping at him from the dugout. Escobar is the one that pulled the "hold me back, bro."
Escobar: *steals third*
Boston: "YOU SON OF A BITCH!"
Even chirping at him from the dugout was stupid, given the circumstances. It's like throwing fastballs down the middle of the plate and then getting pissed off when someone hits a homerun. It was a five run game with two innings to play. It wasn't even a "don't run up the score" situation.
You have to understand, in Boston, the baseball writers are essentially team employees. It's not like the dynamic in most cities.numbers wrote:The local media is trying to sell that angle, but I dont view it that way.philpritchard wrote:I'm curious... are people in Boston viewing this as some kind of turning point where a show of emotion turns the season around?numbers wrote:obviously it was stupid, but the Red Sox have lost 10 in a row, just blew the game, and have a history with the DRays. It's not surprising.philpritchard wrote:Boston: "While you're on second base, we're not going to hold you on and we're going to set up our defense in a way that makes it obvious we're not even pretending that we're trying to get you out."numbers wrote:I mean, they were only chirping at him from the dugout. Escobar is the one that pulled the "hold me back, bro."
Escobar: *steals third*
Boston: "YOU SON OF A BITCH!"
Even chirping at him from the dugout was stupid, given the circumstances. It's like throwing fastballs down the middle of the plate and then getting pissed off when someone hits a homerun. It was a five run game with two innings to play. It wasn't even a "don't run up the score" situation.
Yeah, the Boston media is pretty awful.numbers wrote:You have to understand, in Boston, the baseball writers are essentially team employees. It's not like the dynamic in most cities.numbers wrote:The local media is trying to sell that angle, but I dont view it that way.philpritchard wrote:I'm curious... are people in Boston viewing this as some kind of turning point where a show of emotion turns the season around?numbers wrote:obviously it was stupid, but the Red Sox have lost 10 in a row, just blew the game, and have a history with the DRays. It's not surprising.philpritchard wrote:Boston: "While you're on second base, we're not going to hold you on and we're going to set up our defense in a way that makes it obvious we're not even pretending that we're trying to get you out."numbers wrote:I mean, they were only chirping at him from the dugout. Escobar is the one that pulled the "hold me back, bro."
Escobar: *steals third*
Boston: "YOU SON OF A BITCH!"
Even chirping at him from the dugout was stupid, given the circumstances. It's like throwing fastballs down the middle of the plate and then getting pissed off when someone hits a homerun. It was a five run game with two innings to play. It wasn't even a "don't run up the score" situation.
Unless the player leaves Boston, of course.numbers wrote:Yeah it's pretty bad, the writers are more concerned with maintaining their relationships with players for future book deals etc. than reporting objectively.
Yup.philpritchard wrote:Unless the player leaves Boston, of course.numbers wrote:Yeah it's pretty bad, the writers are more concerned with maintaining their relationships with players for future book deals etc. than reporting objectively.
The Jays are owned by the biggest media/communications company in Canada, yet I find the Rogers analysts like to unfairly criticize the team. It's a bit weird.Lament wrote:For a long time in Chicago, most of the sports writers had the same boss as the Chicago Cubs. It was beyond ridiculous.