Red Mosquito

dimejinky99 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Get rid of the ballots and we'll have a very peaceful — there won't be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation.

And I was accused of being hysterical. Lol.

verb_to_trust wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Get rid of the ballots and we'll have a very peaceful — there won't be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation.

And I was accused of being hysterical. Lol.

4/5 made a post that was level headed and the reaction was: I STILL WOULDNT PUT IT PAST HIM. You guys are feeding off paranoia in unhealthy ways.

Strat wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Get rid of the ballots and we'll have a very peaceful — there won't be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation.

And I was accused of being hysterical. Lol.

4/5 made a post that was level headed and the reaction was: I STILL WOULDNT PUT IT PAST HIM. You guys are feeding off paranoia in unhealthy ways.

You’re burying your head in the sand. I get it. It’s self preservation for you and your own mental well being.

Trump is doing everything we were and are worried about.

Strat wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Get rid of the ballots and we'll have a very peaceful — there won't be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation.

And I was accused of being hysterical. Lol.

4/5 made a post that was level headed and the reaction was: I STILL WOULDNT PUT IT PAST HIM. You guys are feeding off paranoia in unhealthy ways.

You’re burying your head in the sand. I get it. It’s self preservation for you and your own mental well being.

Trump is doing everything we were and are worried about.

McParadigm wrote:Donald Trump will definitely not win re-election without some extreme and unexpected circumstantial change. He’s barely even competitive at this point. I honestly think it’s more likely that we will see organized violence in the streets between now and then than it is that he will legitimately win re-election.

More likely, conservatives will look for ways to delegitimize the results at any and every level. One possible (example) scenario: liberal cities and states continue to ramp up vote by mail infrastructure, while conservative states do not. Conservatives then use the expanded Democrat vote numbers to claim voter fraud, in a bid to sell the incoming president as illegitimate and justify all manner of obstructionist behaviors. They flood the courts with lawsuits over election results, as well as every policy change and budgetary decision, hoping for some payoff on the judgeships they acquired and on the public’s ability to internalize false claims if they hear them often enough.

McParadigm wrote:Four and a half months ago:

McParadigm wrote:Donald Trump will definitely not win re-election without some extreme and unexpected circumstantial change. He’s barely even competitive at this point. I honestly think it’s more likely that we will see organized violence in the streets between now and then than it is that he will legitimately win re-election.

More likely, conservatives will look for ways to delegitimize the results at any and every level. One possible (example) scenario: liberal cities and states continue to ramp up vote by mail infrastructure, while conservative states do not. Conservatives then use the expanded Democrat vote numbers to claim voter fraud, in a bid to sell the incoming president as illegitimate and justify all manner of obstructionist behaviors. They flood the courts with lawsuits over election results, as well as every policy change and budgetary decision, hoping for some payoff on the judgeships they acquired and on the public’s ability to internalize false claims if they hear them often enough.

BurtReynolds wrote:The peaceful transition of power in the 2016 election didn't happen until like 8 months ago.

Hatfield wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:The peaceful transition of power in the 2016 election didn't happen until like 8 months ago.

You're smarter than this, Burt.

BurtReynolds wrote:

Hatfield wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:The peaceful transition of power in the 2016 election didn't happen until like 8 months ago.

You're smarter than this, Burt.

Maybe my dates were off.

96583UP wrote:if Trump loses by a landslide and the SCOTUS 're-elects' him there will be a million people at the white house and they will tear it to the ground, and then they will go to the supreme court and tear it down too

the GOP are not making a Trump victory plausible enough to make enough people complacent

the BLM-fueled protest culture is already primed to destroy

an obvious theft will see otherwise moderate dems take to their feet and rip this thing apart

96583UP wrote:if Trump loses by a landslide and the SCOTUS 're-elects' him there will be a million people at the white house and they will tear it to the ground, and then they will go to the supreme court and tear it down too

the GOP are not making a Trump victory plausible enough to make enough people complacent

the BLM-fueled protest culture is already primed to destroy

an obvious theft will see otherwise moderate dems take to their feet and rip this thing apart

doug rr wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

Hatfield wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:The peaceful transition of power in the 2016 election didn't happen until like 8 months ago.

You're smarter than this, Burt.

Maybe my dates were off.

you don't date, burt...

JuanHamm wrote:It's crazy that neither side really has anything good to say about their candidate. Everyone just defaults to attacking the other guy.

Did nobody in this country ever hear that two wrongs don't make a right.