BurtReynolds wrote:Just the name sounds like a joke.
i would almost see anything with ed norton, but not this...i'm so mad at him
Fingers crossed the movie is nothing like the trailers. Because... christ. But the cast is so fucking great.
unless ebert comes back from the grave and gives it at least 3 stars i'm out
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Mon December 05, 2016 5:35 pm
by epilogue
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Just the name sounds like a joke.
i would almost see anything with ed norton, but not this...i'm so mad at him
Fingers crossed the movie is nothing like the trailers. Because... christ. But the cast is so fucking great.
unless ebert comes back from the grave and gives it at least 3 stars i'm out
Right now it's a Netflix-er, for me. Maybe reviews will change that. I don't know. But Ed Norton's in it, so I will see it eventually.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Mon December 05, 2016 5:36 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Just the name sounds like a joke.
i would almost see anything with ed norton, but not this...i'm so mad at him
Fingers crossed the movie is nothing like the trailers. Because... christ. But the cast is so fucking great.
unless ebert comes back from the grave and gives it at least 3 stars i'm out
Right now it's a Netflix-er, for me. Maybe reviews will change that. I don't know. But Ed Norton's in it, so I will see it eventually.
do you do the physical discs from netflix?
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Mon December 05, 2016 5:41 pm
by epilogue
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Just the name sounds like a joke.
i would almost see anything with ed norton, but not this...i'm so mad at him
Fingers crossed the movie is nothing like the trailers. Because... christ. But the cast is so fucking great.
unless ebert comes back from the grave and gives it at least 3 stars i'm out
Right now it's a Netflix-er, for me. Maybe reviews will change that. I don't know. But Ed Norton's in it, so I will see it eventually.
do you do the physical discs from netflix?
You know it. I still get 2, actually.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Mon December 05, 2016 5:42 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Mon December 05, 2016 5:43 pm
by epilogue
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Lol wut Tom Cruise is in the new Mummy movie?
I have a really hard time getting excited for the new Mummy movie.
I don't think there's a soul on this planet who expects us to feel otherwise.
Not even Alex Kurtzman?
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Mon December 05, 2016 5:46 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Mon December 05, 2016 5:50 pm
by epilogue
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Lol wut Tom Cruise is in the new Mummy movie?
I have a really hard time getting excited for the new Mummy movie.
I don't think there's a soul on this planet who expects us to feel otherwise.
Not even Alex Kurtzman?
Ok, it's understood that the people who made the movie probably want people to be excited for it. But outside of that circle, I think my point stands. It's an unnecessary reboot of a dated flick, starting an insane person and directed by a genre grunt.
I bet LV would be super excited if not for Kurtzman's involvement.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Tue December 06, 2016 11:19 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 07, 2016 12:20 am
by epilogue
The book is good, not great. But certainly give you a lot to think about and has great dialogue/pacing. Should make a really fun film.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 07, 2016 4:34 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 07, 2016 4:08 pm
by epilogue
I happy you're happy, friend.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Thu December 08, 2016 3:10 am
by E.H. Ruddock
That movie Fist Fight looks funny
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Thu December 08, 2016 3:24 am
by bada
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Lol wut Tom Cruise is in the new Mummy movie?
I have a really hard time getting excited for the new Mummy movie.
I don't think there's a soul on this planet who expects us to feel otherwise.
Not even Alex Kurtzman?
Ok, it's understood that the people who made the movie probably want people to be excited for it. But outside of that circle, I think my point stands. It's an unnecessary reboot of a dated flick, starting an insane person and directed by a genre grunt.
I bet LV would be super excited if not for Kurtzman's involvement.
My 10 year old loves the Universal Monsters so I might end up having to seeing this.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Thu December 08, 2016 3:27 am
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Lol wut Tom Cruise is in the new Mummy movie?
I have a really hard time getting excited for the new Mummy movie.
I don't think there's a soul on this planet who expects us to feel otherwise.
Not even Alex Kurtzman?
Ok, it's understood that the people who made the movie probably want people to be excited for it. But outside of that circle, I think my point stands. It's an unnecessary reboot of a dated flick, starting an insane person and directed by a genre grunt.
I bet LV would be super excited if not for Kurtzman's involvement.
haha you called it. I love Cruise and am totally down for this in theory, but Kurtzman's involvement immediately makes me suspicious. That guy is cancer.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Thu December 08, 2016 2:53 pm
by VinylGuy
tragabigzanda wrote:This looks promising. I did not read the book.
Promising how? Emma Watson looks incredibly bored...and the overall aesthetic is bland and generic as hell.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Thu December 08, 2016 2:56 pm
by Jorge
It looks like a Black Mirror episode crossed with a YA novel.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Thu December 08, 2016 2:57 pm
by VinylGuy
yeah i thought that....the song, the editing, emma watson...a figure like tom hanks...ugh.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Thu December 08, 2016 3:22 pm
by epilogue
The aesthetic is dead on. It's all part of the point of the novel and what Egger's is trying to achieve. The art direction looks lights out. The movie could be a giant turd. It's too hard to tell from this first look. Could go either way. But there are things in this trailer that give me hope. These people at least read the book and seem to "get it." We'll see.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Thu December 08, 2016 3:24 pm
by LoathedVermin72
My wife and best friend both love Dave Eggers and both violently hated that book