Red Mosquito

@SkitchP wrote:

philpritchard wrote:Based on recent participation in the NHL thread, I assume it would be tough to get enough people together to do a hockey tournament , but I'm up for running one between this and the next one, if anyone's interested.

Ill do it. All we need is 6 and we can do an original 6 tournament.

Even if it's not original 6, we could probably get a 6-8 team franchise tournament together.

philpritchard wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

philpritchard wrote:Based on recent participation in the NHL thread, I assume it would be tough to get enough people together to do a hockey tournament , but I'm up for running one between this and the next one, if anyone's interested.

Ill do it. All we need is 6 and we can do an original 6 tournament.

Even if it's not original 6, we could probably get a 6-8 team franchise tournament together.

well that just feels silly. But either way.. Im calling the red wings.

@SkitchP wrote:

philpritchard wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

philpritchard wrote:Based on recent participation in the NHL thread, I assume it would be tough to get enough people together to do a hockey tournament , but I'm up for running one between this and the next one, if anyone's interested.

Ill do it. All we need is 6 and we can do an original 6 tournament.

Even if it's not original 6, we could probably get a 6-8 team franchise tournament together.

well that just feels silly. But either way.. Im calling the red wings.

It would just depend which teams the people involved support. An all-time Leafs team would be surprisingly weak given their history.

philpritchard wrote:. An all-time Leafs team would be surprisingly weak given their history.

It's just like real life!

I don't know hockey in enough depth to do one for it. I know the Bruins well, but I don't follow the goings on of the rest of the league like with baseball.

numbers wrote:I don't know hockey in enough depth to do one for it. I know the Bruins well, but I don't follow the goings on of the rest of the league like with baseball.

I think if we were to do it, franchise based is the way to go for the first one. Lets us get a feel for what whatif is looking for.

@SkitchP wrote:

numbers wrote:I don't know hockey in enough depth to do one for it. I know the Bruins well, but I don't follow the goings on of the rest of the league like with baseball.

I think if we were to do it, franchise based is the way to go for the first one. Lets us get a feel for what whatif is looking for.

Agreed.

@SkitchP wrote:well that just feels silly. But either way.. Im calling the red wings.

I'm in if I can be the Pens.

Lament wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:well that just feels silly. But either way.. Im calling the red wings.

I'm in if I can be the Pens.

That's three!

Lament wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:well that just feels silly. But either way.. Im calling the red wings.

I'm in if I can be the Pens.

Huh... I was going to ask if Peeps was still around, but I guess now we don't need him!

philpritchard wrote:

Lament wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:well that just feels silly. But either way.. Im calling the red wings.

I'm in if I can be the Pens.

Huh... I was going to ask if Peeps was still around, but I guess now we don't need him!

Lament is the only person I don't give shit to about liking teams from 3 different cities.

At least I've stuck with all of them since age seven!

Lament wrote:At least I've stuck with all of them since age seven!

If it was the Cubs instead of the White Sox, i imagine id probably harass you.

philpritchard wrote:Based on recent participation in the NHL thread, I assume it would be tough to get enough people together to do a hockey tournament , but I'm up for running one between this and the next one, if anyone's interested.

I'm in.

@SkitchP wrote:

philpritchard wrote:

Lament wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:well that just feels silly. But either way.. Im calling the red wings.

I'm in if I can be the Pens.

Huh... I was going to ask if Peeps was still around, but I guess now we don't need him!

Lament is the only person I don't give shit to about liking teams from 3 different cities.

Lament wrote:At least I've stuck with all of them since age seven!

Rangers, Stars, Rockets, Lions fan. I guess that is three different cities. Four technically. Such is life.

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

philpritchard wrote:

Lament wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:well that just feels silly. But either way.. Im calling the red wings.

I'm in if I can be the Pens.

Huh... I was going to ask if Peeps was still around, but I guess now we don't need him!

Lament is the only person I don't give shit to about liking teams from 3 different cities.

Lament wrote:At least I've stuck with all of them since age seven!

Rangers, Stars, Rockets, Lions fan. I guess that is three different cities. Four technically. Such is life.

2 states though, and I'll never blame anyone for not wanting to be a Cowboys fan.

Is the foot-in-the-crease rule on or off?

Fuck it, if you do the franchise one I'll put together the Big Bad Bruins.

Huh... so we're up to Toronto, Dallas, Pittsburgh, Detroit and Boston without really trying? This should work out. I don't know who all is still around these days, but we've had Flyers, Habs, Islanders, Sabres, Avs fans... lots of time to get a few others in.

I'll take the Blues.