Red Mosquito

Ms Harmless wrote:it's OK to be on the first rung on the ladder of thinking about how we should deal with that

This feels like an insult. How should we deal with it, ms smarty pants

Jorge wrote:This is less a conversation about freedom of speech and more about freedom of slap

on one slapping hand, it isn't, because I haven't argued that Will shouldn't be disciplined through whatever legal channels exist to do that; I've only said that I was personally pro-Will, for my reasons; other people ran with everything I said (and didn't say) and characterised it as "if I had my extremist way, I would enforce across the land the power for anyone to slap whoever they wanted for whatever they wanted"

on the other slapping hand, it is, because everyone has freedom of slap already (we're aware of that, right?); you really can do whatever you want, when you want; the catch, though, is that freedom of slap doesn't come with freedom from consequences and accountability

and it would be so great if the same was true for hurtful words, even if the consequence for those looked different, and highly contextual

maybe Will should go to prison

maybe Chris should be obligated to apologise; teachers make us do this at school and no one bats an eye

maybe that would be somewhere towards what we could call equal

I just want Chris to acknowledge his potty mouth, THAT'S IT

Burt seems to think I'm a "tyrant" and I threaten his freedom of speech because I ask for things he doesn't personally need

Ms Harmless wrote:Burt seems to think I'm a "tyrant" and I threaten his freedom of speech because I ask for things he doesn't personally need

(you're doing it again)


What are these things that you are merely "asking" for? And what happens when I refuse? Are you still just asking then?

BurtReynolds wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:Burt seems to think I'm a "tyrant" and I threaten his freedom of speech because I ask for things he doesn't personally need

(you're doing it again)


What are these things that you are merely "asking" for? And what happens when I refuse? Are you still just asking then?

I'm not asking you personally for diddly squat, don't worry

actually there is one thing: let's drop any imaginary ideas that you're not being wildly subjective

Ms Harmless wrote:

Jorge wrote:This is less a conversation about freedom of speech and more about freedom of slap

on one slapping hand, it isn't, because I haven't argued that Will shouldn't be disciplined through whatever legal channels exist to do that; I've only said that I was personally pro-Will, for my reasons; other people ran with everything I said (and didn't say) and characterised it as "if I had my extremist way, I would enforce across the land the power for anyone to slap whoever they wanted for whatever they wanted"

on the other slapping hand, it is, because everyone has freedom of slap already (we're aware of that, right?); you really can do whatever you want, when you want; the catch, though, is that freedom of slap doesn't come with freedom from consequences and accountability

and it would be so great if the same was true for hurtful words, even if the consequence for those looked different, and highly contextual

maybe Will should go to prison

maybe Chris should be obligated to apologise; teachers make us do this at school and no one bats an eye

maybe that would be somewhere towards what we could call equal

Burt, I am asking for this

if the BurtReynolds RM account can't ring the academy and get it done for me, I will happily accept defeat

and please understand, when I say "asking", I don't mean rolling up to your house in the middle of the night, throwing eggs at your window and slashing your tires until you give it to me

I mean saying on RM "this would be a cool thing to see"

literally everything you're saying to me Burt is precedeeded by this ridiculous foregone conclusion you've made up in your head that I'm a "tyrant", based on a weird belief that people like me want to storm your fort and steal your horses

Are you or are you not in favor of horse redistribution?

Mickey wrote:Are you or are you not in favor of horse redistribution?

what do you mean by "horse"? guns? wealth? brain cells by way of a swift kick to the chops?

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:Are you or are you not in favor of horse redistribution?

what do you mean by "horse"? guns? wealth? brain cells by way of a swift kick to the chops?

Don't equivocate.

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:Are you or are you not in favor of horse redistribution?

what do you mean by "horse"? guns? wealth? brain cells by way of a swift kick to the chops?

Don't equivocate.

based on horses alone... I don't need any horses; I haven't put much thought to whether people don't have horses that need them; I think it's good if someone is thinking about that

Ms Harmless wrote:literally everything you're saying to me Burt is precedeeded by this ridiculous foregone conclusion you've made up in your head that I'm a "tyrant", based on a weird belief that people like me want to storm your fort and steal your horses

Great, I'll remind you of this next time you start spouting off about justified slaps and censorship laws.

BurtReynolds wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:literally everything you're saying to me Burt is precedeeded by this ridiculous foregone conclusion you've made up in your head that I'm a "tyrant", based on a weird belief that people like me want to storm your fort and steal your horses

Great, I'll remind you of this next time you start spouting off about justified slaps and censorship laws.

can't fucking wait buddy

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:Are you or are you not in favor of horse redistribution?

what do you mean by "horse"? guns? wealth? brain cells by way of a swift kick to the chops?

Don't equivocate.

based on horses alone... I don't need any horses; I haven't put much thought to whether people don't have horses that need them; I think it's good if someone is thinking about that

From each accord to his stable, to each according to his ride.

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Mickey wrote:Are you or are you not in favor of horse redistribution?

what do you mean by "horse"? guns? wealth? brain cells by way of a swift kick to the chops?

Don't equivocate.

based on horses alone... I don't need any horses; I haven't put much thought to whether people don't have horses that need them; I think it's good if someone is thinking about that

From each accord to his stable, to each according to his ride.

yeehaw

"accountability culture please"

"censorship laws?"

"no, just accountability culture please"

"ah! censorship laws! I thought so!"

"no, just --"

"you can pry my imaginary list of words I enjoy from my cold dead hands, with a wrench!"

"OK; I'm going to the shop, want anything?"

nice try.