Red Mosquito

@SkitchP wrote:

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

philpritchard wrote:

Lament wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:well that just feels silly. But either way.. Im calling the red wings.

I'm in if I can be the Pens.

Huh... I was going to ask if Peeps was still around, but I guess now we don't need him!

Lament is the only person I don't give shit to about liking teams from 3 different cities.

Lament wrote:At least I've stuck with all of them since age seven!

Rangers, Stars, Rockets, Lions fan. I guess that is three different cities. Four technically. Such is life.

2 states though, and I'll never blame anyone for not wanting to be a Cowboys fan.

My family is full of Cowboys fans. No thanks. I have been a Lions fan since they drafted Barry. My first Husker football game was against Okie State the year he won the Heisman.

philpritchard wrote:Is the foot-in-the-crease rule on or off?

Well played haha.

I am not sure I wanna be the Stars though just because of lack of history. Kinda was hoping to be Montreal.

If not I will be the Stars. Can I just play with the 98-99 team?

SEMIFINALS GAME 5

Chudville Nine @ Winning By Numbers

http://www.whatifsports.com/slb/Boxscor ... pbp=0&tf=0

Spoiler: show

Winning By Numbers 6, Chudville Nine 5
W - Plesac, L - Myers
HR - Yastrzemski, Lynn

(Winning By Numbers wins series, 4-1)

Aubrey Plazas @ Kaius' Garainals

http://www.whatifsports.com/slb/Boxscor ... pbp=0&tf=0

Spoiler: show

Aubrey Plazas 8, Kaius' Garainals 4
W - Carlton, L - Hernandez
HR - Ventura, Mitchell

(Kaius' Garainals lead series, 3-2)

Good series, Chud.

Randy Myers had been flawless all season too...

cutuphalfdead wrote:Randy Myers had been flawless all season too...

Now do you want to have a hockey team

@SkitchP wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:Randy Myers had been flawless all season too...

Now do you want to have a hockey team

Nope

philpritchard wrote:Huh... so we're up to Toronto, Dallas, Pittsburgh, Detroit and Boston without really trying? This should work out. I don't know who all is still around these days, but we've had Flyers, Habs, Islanders, Sabres, Avs fans... lots of time to get a few others in.

I'm in. I'll take the Hawks, unless someone else wants them, I wouldn't mind taking on another team.

Also, I am going to e-mail you my final stats.

So i am looking at this, and what kind of rules do we want? I vote for "playoff rules" so there is no shootouts to contend with. Also Im playing around with the spreadsheet, and the Time on ice stuff is going to make copy/paste difficult i think

@SkitchP wrote:So i am looking at this, and what kind of rules do we want? I vote for "playoff rules" so there is no shootouts to contend with. Also Im playing around with the spreadsheet, and the Time on ice stuff is going to make copy/paste difficult i think

Do we need time on ice? I haven't played around with the hockey section much yet, but I will over next couple days.

I feel like prettymuch every team involved will have a handful of players better then the best Leafs, but I guess it'll depend how WhatIf rates the guys from the '60s and earlier.

cutuphalfdead wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:Randy Myers had been flawless all season too...

Now do you want to have a hockey team

Nope

I'm glad Randy Myers ruined your comeback.

philpritchard wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:So i am looking at this, and what kind of rules do we want? I vote for "playoff rules" so there is no shootouts to contend with. Also Im playing around with the spreadsheet, and the Time on ice stuff is going to make copy/paste difficult i think

Do we need time on ice? I haven't played around with the hockey section much yet, but I will over next couple days.

YES! If it's in the box score it needs to be incorporated onto the spreadsheet!

So you get to create a roster of 23 guys (20 skaters/3 goalies or 21 skaters/2 goalies). But you only get to set your top scoring line for each game. So its going to play the same 20 guys each night... I guess you could put one of your last 3 guys on the top line and that would bump someone else out.

I think time on ice wont be too big a deal, just wont be able to cut and paste across the board, because the time on ice stuff is in the middle of the box score.

philpritchard wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:Randy Myers had been flawless all season too...

Now do you want to have a hockey team

Nope

I'm glad Randy Myers ruined your comeback.

SEMIFINALS GAME 6

Kaius' Garainals @ Aubrey Plazas

http://www.whatifsports.com/slb/Boxscor ... pbp=0&tf=0

Spoiler: show

Aubrey Plazas 9, Kaius' Garainals 8
W - Eckersley, L - Hernandez
HR - Stargell, Mitchell, Foster, Hoiles

(Series is tied, 3-3)

Lament wrote:SEMIFINALS GAME 6

Kaius' Garainals @ Aubrey Plazas

http://www.whatifsports.com/slb/Boxscor ... pbp=0&tf=0

Spoiler: show

Aubrey Plazas 9, Kaius' Garainals 8
W - Eckersley, L - Hernandez
HR - Stargell, Mitchell, Foster, Hoiles

(Series is tied, 3-3)

What a crazy game!

Oooohhhh man. Crazy.

My sad, pathetic playoff numbers.

My teams has flipped it's tendencies. Now my pitchers are garbage, but everyone is hitting up a storm.

Perry is the only guy I can start tomorrow. Kaius, you can start either Tudor or Clemens. Let me know if you want to switch to Clemens.

I'm sticking with the same rotation for the WORLD series.

numbers wrote:the WORLD series.

AKA the numbers classic.

If I win, can we make that the name of future playoff finals?