Page 13 of 24
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Sat August 15, 2015 7:15 pm
by Monkey_Driven
BigRedLedbetter wrote:Monkey_Driven wrote:BigRedLedbetter wrote:Monkey_Driven wrote:BigRedLedbetter wrote:I LOOOOVED these that we wore for the Wisconsin game in 2012!

These are pretty bad. Certainly better than the abominations they wore last year though. I hated the years Nebraska wore white on white too.
Nah I like those.
Yes the ones last year were awful.
These are really bad!

I happen to like that look. It is contemporary, but not complicated. Not my favorite combination of Mizzou's uniforms but still good. To each his own I guess.
Indeed.
The ones you wore in the Corby Jones era were good.

Give me today's black tops and gold bottoms. Or black tops and black bottoms. That is a good look.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Sat August 15, 2015 8:02 pm
by verb_to_trust
Everton's third kits this year are pretty cool.

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Sat August 15, 2015 10:05 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
verb_to_trust wrote:Everton's third kits this year are pretty cool.


Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 18, 2015 2:00 am
by Lament
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 18, 2015 3:07 pm
by numbers
This is awful news. I dont want three stripes plastered all over hockey sweaters that havent changed since the 1950's.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 18, 2015 3:17 pm
by Lament
I want an Adidas logo stamped right on the cheek of the Indian Head.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Thu August 20, 2015 7:37 pm
by Norah
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Thu August 20, 2015 7:39 pm
by EJ
cutuphalfdead wrote:

our prayers have been answered
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Thu August 20, 2015 7:42 pm
by Norah
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Thu August 20, 2015 7:51 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
numbers wrote:
This is awful news. I dont want three stripes plastered all over hockey sweaters that havent changed since the 1950's.
Seriously. Such a bad idea.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Thu August 20, 2015 8:50 pm
by Lament
cutuphalfdead wrote:
It hurts me that I can't go to this game.
Weird that it's against Seattle. Everyone has assumed for about a month or so that it would be against Cleveland, since both team stores started selling 1976 throwbacks on the same day with the same description (that they were to be worn on the field for a future game).
The home team is responsible for outfitting the road team if they want them to wear throwbacks. In theory I'd think they'd want to outfit the Mariners in their inaugural gear from 1977, since they're apparently making modifications to USCF that night to make it feel more 70s, and since the 1977 White Sox are one of the most beloved White Sox team of the post-Go Go Sox era. But they keep making it a point to refer to the throwbacks as being 1976, which seems intentional (I mean, they always refer to the beach blanket uniforms as the 1983 jerseys even though they debuted in 1982, so it's not just a case of them always referring to them by their debut date). It'll suck if the Mariners just wear their current jerseys.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Thu August 20, 2015 9:34 pm
by numbers
I did not know that the home team is responsible for outfitting the road team when throwbacks are worn. That would explain the Red Sox "negro leagues" throwbacks in Seattle earlier this year.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Fri August 21, 2015 5:31 am
by Lament
Tigers looked good in these throwbacks against the Cubs the other day.

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Mon August 24, 2015 2:38 pm
by Monkey_Driven
Lament wrote:Tigers looked good in these throwbacks against the Cubs the other day.

Yeah, those are real nice.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 25, 2015 2:10 pm
by Bammer
Lament wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:
It hurts me that I can't go to this game.
Weird that it's against Seattle. Everyone has assumed for about a month or so that it would be against Cleveland, since both team stores started selling 1976 throwbacks on the same day with the same description (that they were to be worn on the field for a future game).
The home team is responsible for outfitting the road team if they want them to wear throwbacks. In theory I'd think they'd want to outfit the Mariners in their inaugural gear from 1977, since they're apparently making modifications to USCF that night to make it feel more 70s, and since the 1977 White Sox are one of the most beloved White Sox team of the post-Go Go Sox era. But they keep making it a point to refer to the throwbacks as being 1976, which seems intentional (I mean, they always refer to the beach blanket uniforms as the 1983 jerseys even though they debuted in 1982, so it's not just a case of them always referring to them by their debut date).
It'll suck if the Mariners just wear their current jerseys.
This is one of many contexts under which you can use the words "Mariners" and "suck" in the same sentence.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Tue August 25, 2015 9:34 pm
by Lament
This is what the Mariners should be wearing for that game.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Thu August 27, 2015 11:50 am
by darth_vedder
Picking up on the NFL thread, I too really like the green / yellow (gold) look.
Although I hate Notre Dame, I really like this uniform:

Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Thu August 27, 2015 7:47 pm
by Lament
I know it's complete and utter blasphemy, but I actually prefer that to their traditional look.
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Thu August 27, 2015 7:57 pm
by verb_to_trust
I agree
Re: Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...
Posted: Thu August 27, 2015 8:02 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Lament wrote:I know it's complete and utter blasphemy, but I actually prefer that to their traditional look.
Same.