Red Mosquito

sweeper wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:The Philadelphia Eagles have declined an invitation to the White House to meet Trump.
Is anyone going to give a single shit? Other than Trump?

https://x.com/Notwokenow/status/1893833730625568980

I will refer to that persons username.

No more needs saying.

*why would someone from Kentucky be supporting a team from Philly?
And just how many flags do you need in your profile?

why is this in the 13th album rumors and speculation thread!?

because the new album will have a song on it called Big Big Field, dedicated to the Philly Eagles

their owner is a big anti-trump guy

and bradley cooper and Ed are friendly

and PJ always puts on a great PHI show

so

basically

it's guaranteed to happen

I’d bet that at least 90% of people who are going to buy Pearl Jam’s next album, have already decided that they will be buying Pearl Jam’s next album. And that very few people will choose not to buy it based on something said or done by someone in the band.

Matters wrote:I’d bet that at least 90% of people who are going to buy Pearl Jam’s next album, have already decided that they will be buying Pearl Jam’s next album. And that very few people will choose not to buy it based on something said or done by someone in the band.

actually I think your latter group are most likely to be in your former group, if one of the band turned out to be a sexual predator or something

I hope we get a better album title with this one.

Leatherhead wrote:I hope we get a better album title with this one.

They've never been super great at album titles. I actually don't mind Dark Matter, though, as a title. Certainly better than fucking Gigaton.

epilogue wrote:

Leatherhead wrote:I hope we get a better album title with this one.

They've never been super great at album titles. I actually don't mind Dark Matter, though, as a title. Certainly better than fucking Gigaton.

Because they don’t play a lot of shows, right?

wease wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Leatherhead wrote:I hope we get a better album title with this one.

They've never been super great at album titles. I actually don't mind Dark Matter, though, as a title. Certainly better than fucking Gigaton.

Because they don’t play a lot of shows, right?

wease, I swear to god

This one could be a real banger, eh comrades?

if they combine the best of what they've learned from the last two

1. please still be weird sometimes
2. please still write a good melody

And

3) please stay away from Serban Ghenea

Just let Jeff write the whole next album

It’s been 15 months, so we’ve got another 15 months before they start talking about heading into the studio.

Update on album 13

According to Stone and Matt they're about halfway done
Mike says it's heavy like VS
Jeff says he doesn't know what either Stone, Matt or Mike are talking about
Ed & Boom are in Hawaii

New update:

Mike’s saying it’s the best thing they’ve ever done.

Stone says Ed’s better than ever and he is an awe.

Jeff says they have a lot of demoes but haven’t talked about when they may all be in the same room again.

Matt’s working on a side project with a remaining member of Soundgarden and a bunch of randos.

Boom’s somewhere jamming out to Crazy Mary on his B3.

Ed is still in Hawaii.

Today, Bruce Springsteen releases Tracks 2, a series of 7 lost albums from 1983-present he never released, and there’s already talk of Tracks 3, another 5 complete lost albums - taken with The Promise released with a revamped Darkness, that means Bruce Springsteen will have released more lost albums than Pearl Jam has albums released when Tracks 3 comes out.

liebzz wrote:Today, Bruce Springsteen releases Tracks 2, a series of 7 lost albums from 1983-present he never released, and there’s already talk of Tracks 3, another 5 complete lost albums - taken with The Promise released with a revamped Darkness, that means Bruce Springsteen will have released more lost albums than Pearl Jam has albums released when Tracks 3 comes out.

How much of this is attributable to Bruce's ability to function as an individual (record albums alone if desired) vs. Pearl Jam's existence as a collective (have to get them all together to make anything happen)?

Or was Bruce just always super ambitious and thought every album could and should be a double album?

Bruce is extremely prolific and famously tossed aside a lot of work to fit albums. It seems like every time he releases an album he has another 2 albums worth of material that didn’t fit the narrative focus of a particular album. For Darkness, it was in large part due to the lawsuit he was involved in that kept him from releasing a new album between 1975 and 1978…but he also had a second double album’s worth of material from The River, this whole other album in between Nebraska and Born in the USA (it actually to me sounded more like a cross between Nebraska and Tunnel of Love), and all this stuff, in addition to the 4 disc Tracks, and the forthcoming Tracks 3.