Page 13 of 19
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 11:00 am
by broken iris
I am kinda glad this came up. We were running out of insignificant things to complain about.
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 12:59 pm
by Angus
So that Boston (+ a limited number of extra cities) tour was fake?
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 1:06 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
Angus wrote:So that Boston (+ a limited number of extra cities) tour was fake?
it appears so, but the real list of tour stops wont be that much different im sure
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 6:40 pm
by bodysnatcher
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Angus wrote:So that Boston (+ a limited number of extra cities) tour was fake?
it appears so, but the real list of tour stops wont be that much different im sure
Boston, NYC, Philly, Wash DC, Hartford (maybe), Chicago, Los Angeles
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 8:47 pm
by oblivious
maybe it's new album news
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 9:09 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
oblivious wrote:maybe it's new album news
already came out yesterday, it was just some old Ed demos from around 89 or so.
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 9:12 pm
by Fuck You Jobu
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:oblivious wrote:maybe it's new album news
already came out yesterday, it was just some old Ed demos from around 89 or so.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 9:14 pm
by Jorge
oblivious and obliviouser
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 9:23 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
theplatypus wrote:oblivious and obliviouser

Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 9:26 pm
by Fuck You Jobu
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:theplatypus wrote:oblivious and obliviouser


Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 9:37 pm
by Fuzzcharger
Champagne RM.
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 10:09 pm
by Birds in Hell
Fuzzcharger wrote:Champagne RM.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 10:10 pm
by Norah
for everyone!
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Wed January 30, 2013 10:16 pm
by Angus
Fuzzcharger wrote:Champagne RM.
I thought it was Champaign IL.
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Thu January 31, 2013 11:21 am
by Got Some
I'm waiting to read stips review before I make my decision on whether to check out these songs.
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Thu January 31, 2013 12:03 pm
by stip
in all seriousness if you never heard these before they are an interesting listen. And there are one or two that I wold have liked to see PJ pick up besides betterman. But mostly it is of historical value.
Still, if I had never heard this stuff before I think this would have been worthy of all the hype Antiquiet gave it. It's just that unless something is genuinely knew, rather than old and rareish, it'll be hard to surprise enough people to justify the hyperbole.
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Thu January 31, 2013 1:04 pm
by Blenheim Augustine
stip wrote:in all seriousness if you never heard these before they are an interesting listen. And there are one or two that I wold have liked to see PJ pick up besides betterman. But mostly it is of historical value.
Still, if I had never heard this stuff before I think this would have been worthy of all the hype Antiquiet gave it. It's just that unless something is genuinely knew, rather than old and rareish, it'll be hard to surprise enough people to justify the hyperbole.
The problem was that most people who are going to care about new Pearl Jam in 2013 are likely to have heard these (apart from the people that have been retweeted by AQ). If it hadn't been three decades since they last produced an album I doubt it would have produced such a the rabid piranha frenzy that it did. Antiquiet should understand that.
People are always going to be much more aggressive online than they are in real life since people usually type the thoughts that are in their head rather than what they would actually say outloud.
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Thu January 31, 2013 6:25 pm
by stip
Blenheim Augustine wrote:stip wrote:in all seriousness if you never heard these before they are an interesting listen. And there are one or two that I wold have liked to see PJ pick up besides betterman. But mostly it is of historical value.
Still, if I had never heard this stuff before I think this would have been worthy of all the hype Antiquiet gave it. It's just that unless something is genuinely knew, rather than old and rareish, it'll be hard to surprise enough people to justify the hyperbole.
The problem was that most people who are going to care about new Pearl Jam in 2013 are likely to have heard these (apart from the people that have been retweeted by AQ). If it hadn't been three decades since they last produced an album I doubt it would have produced such a the rabid piranha frenzy that it did. Antiquiet should understand that.
that's true.
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Fri February 01, 2013 4:21 am
by Rat
Listening to Ed's songs in good quality was nice, a first for me. I've heard the songs for years of course. Homeless and BYM are good tunes. It got me thinking... What percentage chance do you think Eddie would have been able to make a humble living on music if not for Mike and Stone. And vice versa, what percentage chance would have Stone had if not for Ed? And Jeff? Mike? Dave Krusen? Who had the best shot?
Re: Antiquiet Tweet
Posted: Fri February 01, 2013 4:28 am
by Birds in Hell
I imagine Jeff and Stone would've been fine if not for Pearl Jam, though not as hugely successful.
Mike would totally be a weekend blues lawyer.
Ed, who knows.