Re: Blade Runner 2049 (2017)
Posted: Fri January 19, 2018 3:36 pm
juvenile trashdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh man, I had a completely different experience. The thing worked on my on every level.
juvenile trashdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh man, I had a completely different experience. The thing worked on my on every level.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:juvenile trashdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh man, I had a completely different experience. The thing worked on my on every level.
I gotta find the Dunkirk thread then.theplatypus wrote:No way it's worse than Dunkirk
I just finished the first vol of Akira, and the vibe is there for sure. Pretty much every road reminded me of BR.BurtReynolds wrote:I get an Akira vibe from it. Which I guess shouldn't be a surprise considering Akira is Blade Runner, but still it feels more Akira for some reason.
Slightly better still:
I completely agree about the fight/action scenes. Very awkward and ill-fitting.dimejinky99 wrote:I didn’t hate it. Just left me cold. It didn’t engage me at all. And the all the fight sequences seemed to be totally at odds with the whole rest of the movie.
It looked handsome but that’s about all.
Update: There is no Dunkirk thread.bune wrote:I gotta find the Dunkirk thread then.theplatypus wrote:No way it's worse than Dunkirk
I liked Dunkirk (didn't love it) but it's complete and utter trash next to Blade Runner 2049.bune wrote:Update: There is no Dunkirk thread.bune wrote:I gotta find the Dunkirk thread then.theplatypus wrote:No way it's worse than Dunkirk
But I did find a lot of posts disparaging it, those were fun.
It’s complete and utter trash regardlessdurdencommatyler wrote:I liked Dunkirk (didn't love it) but it's complete and utter trash next to Blade Runner 2049.bune wrote:Update: There is no Dunkirk thread.bune wrote:I gotta find the Dunkirk thread then.theplatypus wrote:No way it's worse than Dunkirk
But I did find a lot of posts disparaging it, those were fun.
It's Memento but set in WW2.dimejinky99 wrote:Hand on heart I still don’t get Dunkirk. Is there a weird time loop thing going on or something?
It felt real though. It captured the spirit and tone of the time. But it’s an excercise in suspense with no real outcome or payoff.
So I guess it has something in common with Blade runner.
‘Because we can. Because why not’
Which is it’s own kind of art I guess.
So many weird shots, like the scene where they evacuated the boat and they said, "Come on Gibson" (the French guy) and instead of getting off the boat he ends up drowning and they linger on him being drowned for a couple seconds. What was that even supposed to show?However, although some events are based on true history, the characters and the storyline are fictional; Branagh's role is a composite character.[179] When the beach scenes were shot, the weather was worse than during the real evacuation; Nolan explained that this helped to understand the danger faced by the pleasure boats.[180] In one scene, an officer gives a salute without wearing his military beret, which a veteran pointed out as inaccurate protocol.[181] The German planes had noses painted yellow in the film; this was not actually done until a month after Dunkirk.[179] The involvement of French, African, and Indian soldiers was either limited or left out.[169][176] Modern shots were used for the aerial photographs, whereas in reality the town was substantially in ruins by the time of the evacuation. The design of the leaflets dropped from the air demanding the British surrender was artistic and not one used in 1940.[176]
I don't understand this at all.bune wrote:It's Memento but set in WW2.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:The level of incompetence in the editing and direction of Dunkirk is truly surprising. And concerning. People don’t even seem to understand the basic GRAMMAR of cinema anymore, let alone how human emotion works.
Did you see Dunkirk? They tell you the end of the movie and then go about telling you how they got there. This is repeated throughout the movie where they show you something and then a little later show you what happened previously.durdencommatyler wrote:I don't understand this at all.bune wrote:It's Memento but set in WW2.
Did you see Dunkirk? Because that's... that's not how I remember the movie.bune wrote:Did you see Dunkirk? They tell you the end of the movie and then go about telling you how they got there. This is repeated throughout the movie where they show you something and then a little later show you what happened previously.durdencommatyler wrote:I don't understand this at all.bune wrote:It's Memento but set in WW2.