Red Mosquito

stupidmop wrote:

Tuolumne wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

Tuolumne wrote:Don't get me started on the long breaks between albums. The band members need to start submitting time sheets to us fans. Hours need to be accounted for. Dock pay when they spend too much time on side projects. I can run a labor productivity analysis and then RM can collectively develop a recommendation to the Curtis Management. This is what responsible shareholders of the band do.

i think you take your job too seriously.

This is serious stuff, man. We spend hours and tens of thousands of posts on this board. We pay their bills. We buy their merch. We schedule our vacation and travel around this band. We need answers. They need to get with it, or I'm out.

You realise, that this is a message board where people come to waste time and talk about pearl jam whether that be complaining/whining or praising, all the while being pretty sure no one in the band spends thier time reading this shit right?

If people were gathering here to write pearl jam a sternly worded manifesto detailing all that is wrong with them currently, to deliever to eddie's doorstep then you'd have a point, but i don't think anyones started taking minutes yet. S'all just bullshit.

You've got the sarcasm for this place down though

Tuolumne wrote:And they need to SUBMIT a list of desired producers prior to entering the studio. A RM poll would then solve everything.

Tuolumne wrote:You're being way too serious for this place. Cause all we do is joke around here.

Tuolumne wrote:

stupidmop wrote:

Tuolumne wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

Tuolumne wrote:Don't get me started on the long breaks between albums. The band members need to start submitting time sheets to us fans. Hours need to be accounted for. Dock pay when they spend too much time on side projects. I can run a labor productivity analysis and then RM can collectively develop a recommendation to the Curtis Management. This is what responsible shareholders of the band do.

i think you take your job too seriously.

This is serious stuff, man. We spend hours and tens of thousands of posts on this board. We pay their bills. We buy their merch. We schedule our vacation and travel around this band. We need answers. They need to get with it, or I'm out.

You realise, that this is a message board where people come to waste time and talk about pearl jam whether that be complaining/whining or praising, all the while being pretty sure no one in the band spends thier time reading this shit right?

If people were gathering here to write pearl jam a sternly worded manifesto detailing all that is wrong with them currently, to deliever to eddie's doorstep then you'd have a point, but i don't think anyones started taking minutes yet. S'all just bullshit.

You've got the sarcasm for this place down though

We're on the cusp of taking minutes and sending them to the band. We're almost there, if we just stay a team, we can DO this. I'm trying to be the leader and take ya'll to the promised land.

harmless wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

Strat wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

Strat wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

theplatypus wrote:Also, Mike and Ed have basically said that it most likely won't be in it, so.

I missed that, did they say it in recent interviews?

I think its been since last spring at least? Never know....

I guess i don't try to find many interviews, ill read them if i notice they get posted here

I dont think any of them have specifically stated it wont be on the album but Mike eluded to Ed not being happy with the studio taking of the song and have not really found a place for the song to fit on a record. That could have all changed once they found a direction for the album...

Im still hoping to get that studio version some way, whether its on the album, or maybe a b side, but if they enjoyed playing it live then i wonder what the problem with it was in the studio

Brendan's additions?

Tuolumne wrote:You're being way too serious for this place. Cause all we do is joke around here.

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

harmless wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

Strat wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

Strat wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

theplatypus wrote:Also, Mike and Ed have basically said that it most likely won't be in it, so.

I missed that, did they say it in recent interviews?

I think its been since last spring at least? Never know....

I guess i don't try to find many interviews, ill read them if i notice they get posted here

I dont think any of them have specifically stated it wont be on the album but Mike eluded to Ed not being happy with the studio taking of the song and have not really found a place for the song to fit on a record. That could have all changed once they found a direction for the album...

Im still hoping to get that studio version some way, whether its on the album, or maybe a b side, but if they enjoyed playing it live then i wonder what the problem with it was in the studio

Brendan's additions?

They need to fire that dude

harmless wrote:Pearl Jam is our favourite corporate punch bag. I bet they don't even pay their taxes.

Lament wrote:

harmless wrote:Pearl Jam is our favourite corporate punch bag. I bet they don't even pay their taxes.

I saw Ed at Walmart.

stupidmop wrote:Whatever relationship they had going from vs-yield was working.

southp wrote:I can't tell what part of this thread is real or bullshit any more.

Anyways... Lightning Bolt is going to rock

stupidmop wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

harmless wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

Strat wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

Strat wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

theplatypus wrote:Also, Mike and Ed have basically said that it most likely won't be in it, so.

I missed that, did they say it in recent interviews?

I think its been since last spring at least? Never know....

I guess i don't try to find many interviews, ill read them if i notice they get posted here

I dont think any of them have specifically stated it wont be on the album but Mike eluded to Ed not being happy with the studio taking of the song and have not really found a place for the song to fit on a record. That could have all changed once they found a direction for the album...

Im still hoping to get that studio version some way, whether its on the album, or maybe a b side, but if they enjoyed playing it live then i wonder what the problem with it was in the studio

Brendan's additions?

They need to fire that dude

Can we get a petition going?


Seriously though i hope they've fought back over some of his changes, like the good old days. Whatever relationship they had going from vs-yield was working.

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

stupidmop wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

harmless wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

Strat wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

Strat wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

theplatypus wrote:Also, Mike and Ed have basically said that it most likely won't be in it, so.

I missed that, did they say it in recent interviews?

I think its been since last spring at least? Never know....

I guess i don't try to find many interviews, ill read them if i notice they get posted here

I dont think any of them have specifically stated it wont be on the album but Mike eluded to Ed not being happy with the studio taking of the song and have not really found a place for the song to fit on a record. That could have all changed once they found a direction for the album...

Im still hoping to get that studio version some way, whether its on the album, or maybe a b side, but if they enjoyed playing it live then i wonder what the problem with it was in the studio

Brendan's additions?

They need to fire that dude

Can we get a petition going?


Seriously though i hope they've fought back over some of his changes, like the good old days. Whatever relationship they had going from vs-yield was working.

The new sign campaign at the shows isn't for a song

stip wrote:Take it to the across the Atlantic thread you crazy monarchists.