Red Mosquito

"I think I've done this right...

I'll just see what Mel's got down."

On board the 1500 train.

Although, as I think of it, 1600 would be more appropriate.

I guess when English for you is a made up language the literacy of someone with English as a second language is a better bet.

Rangi Guy wrote:

Higgs wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:blame the parents not the potus

Blame them for what? Donald and Melania are not sick.

You think they should wear masks when they've already had covid?

Isn't the White House currently the most infected place in all of the USA?

That's what I was thinking. Who in the hell would send their kids there?

supreme court elect apparently

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:blame the parents not the potus

Blame them for what? Donald and Melania are not sick.

You think they should wear masks when they've already had covid?

Yes, I think the President, all Cabinet Members, all Senators, all Representatives, and all Supreme Court Justices should wear a mask whenever they are in public regardless of their COVID status and regardless of distance from others for two reasons. One, we don't REALLY know when a person starts or stops being infectious or how long they are immune after infection. Two, it's a message to all of the American public from their leaders that masks are normal and important.

B wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

96583UP wrote:blame the parents not the potus

Blame them for what? Donald and Melania are not sick.

You think they should wear masks when they've already had covid?

Yes, I think the President, all Cabinet Members, all Senators, all Representatives, and all Supreme Court Justices should wear a mask whenever they are in public regardless of their COVID status and regardless of distance from others for two reasons. One, we don't REALLY know when a person starts or stops being infectious or how long they are immune after infection. Two, it's a message to all of the American public from their leaders that masks are normal and important.

The second part makes a fair point I guess.

Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

I mean, do we know if verb has left his house since spring? Not sure he really gets what’s happening out there in reality.

spike wrote:Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

B wrote:

spike wrote:Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

Obviously. Glad you're sister's healthy.

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

To try and lure me into battle

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

to underscore my intolerance of any suggestion that simple mitigation measures aren’t worthwhile at this time.

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

to underscore my intolerance of any suggestion that simple mitigation measures aren’t worthwhile at this time.

I wear my mask bruh

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

to underscore my intolerance of any suggestion that simple mitigation measures aren’t worthwhile at this time.

I wear my mask bruh

But do you like it?

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

B wrote:

spike wrote:Hey verb, my sister (third grade teacher) and an assistant teacher were around a kid who tested positive. Nevertheless, they both tested negative, probably because all parties were masked. Neat, huh?

To be fair to verb (since he conceded my point above), that COULD have happened even without masks. It's not the likely result, just possible.

Of course, but this kid tested positive on a Friday, and they interacted with him daily all week. Neat, huh?

curious why you used "neat, huh?" for a second, consecutive time

to underscore my intolerance of any suggestion that simple mitigation measures aren’t worthwhile at this time.

I wear my mask bruh

Because JB says you have to. You don’t seem to believe in it.