Page 122 of 199

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:02 am
by verb_to_trust
Jorge wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
digster wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
Romney's communications director.
Yeah I get that. But we don't need to hear this person talk.
Her job is literally to talk and clarify a Senator's opinions and positions.
:haha:
Do you guys think it's particularly helpful to have people like this flooding twitter with messaging the second something like this happens?

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:03 am
by Strat
verb_to_trust wrote:
Jorge wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
digster wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
Romney's communications director.
Yeah I get that. But we don't need to hear this person talk.
Her job is literally to talk and clarify a Senator's opinions and positions.
:haha:
Do you guys think it's particularly helpful to have people like this flooding twitter with messaging the second something like this happens?
are you mad at her for clarifying someone flooding twitter, or are you mad at the original tweet that flooded twitter?

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:03 am
by Simple Torture
Jorge wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
digster wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
Romney's communications director.
Yeah I get that. But we don't need to hear this person talk.
Her job is literally to talk and clarify a Senator's opinions and positions.
:haha:

EDIT: I was laughing at the first version of this post which was much funnier. What the hell, ST
Tbf the first version was also true, just felt like adding a bit of spice.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:04 am
by digster
Yeah, if you're going to be mad at someone, be mad at the original guy who floated the rumor.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:04 am
by Green Habit

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:05 am
by Jorge
Simple Torture wrote:
Jorge wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
digster wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
Romney's communications director.
Yeah I get that. But we don't need to hear this person talk.
Her job is literally to talk and clarify a Senator's opinions and positions.
:haha:

EDIT: I was laughing at the first version of this post which was much funnier. What the hell, ST
Tbf the first version was also true, just felt like adding a bit of spice.
You sacrificed comedic value for accuracy and I do not like that

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:07 am
by Green Habit
digster wrote: I honestly wouldn't be that surprised if four Republicans come out like this. Murkowski, Collins, Romney are three, and Lamar Alexander has said there shouldn't be a vote in 2020, and he's retiring this year and doesn't have to worry about re-election.
There's still a three week window between the new Congress and Inauguration Day, so Alexander's GOP replacement could easily wreck that.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:10 am
by verb_to_trust
Strat wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
Jorge wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
digster wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
Romney's communications director.
Yeah I get that. But we don't need to hear this person talk.
Her job is literally to talk and clarify a Senator's opinions and positions.
:haha:
Do you guys think it's particularly helpful to have people like this flooding twitter with messaging the second something like this happens?
are you mad at her for clarifying someone flooding twitter, or are you mad at the original tweet that flooded twitter?
I'm mad at twitter existing

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:12 am
by Strat
verb_to_trust wrote:
Strat wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
Jorge wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
digster wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
Romney's communications director.
Yeah I get that. But we don't need to hear this person talk.
Her job is literally to talk and clarify a Senator's opinions and positions.
:haha:
Do you guys think it's particularly helpful to have people like this flooding twitter with messaging the second something like this happens?
are you mad at her for clarifying someone flooding twitter, or are you mad at the original tweet that flooded twitter?
I'm mad at twitter existing
I hate social media too, verb.

Let the bad times roll.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:28 am
by Bi_3
If the red team has any dignity left, they will wait.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:32 am
by Strat
Bi_3 wrote:If the red team has any dignity left, they will wait.
They lined up behind trump.

They gave up their dignity.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:50 am
by simple schoolboy
Bi_3 wrote:If the red team has any dignity left, they will wait.
Whenever they do it, I hope they announce the nomination in the memory of Merrick Garland.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 2:50 am
by elliseamos
Strat wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:If the red team has any dignity left, they will wait.
They lined up behind trump.

They gave up their dignity.
I'm surprised it's not already filled.

What restraint.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 3:39 am
by simple schoolboy

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 4:05 am
by Rob
Bi_3 wrote:If the red team has any dignity left, they will wait.
The red team immediately said they wouldn’t wait.

I do pretty much agree with the tweet Green Habit posted above. Dems, if they win, should add 2 justices if they can.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 4:07 am
by Norah
Rob wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:If the red team has any dignity left, they will wait.
The red team immediately said they wouldn’t wait.

I do pretty much agree with the tweet Green Habit posted above. Dems, if they win, should add 2 justices if they can.
They should add 4 new justices.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 4:15 am
by verb_to_trust
We need term limits for these dinosaurs so we don't have to do this stupid fucking dance everytime one of them dies.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 4:25 am
by Strat
verb_to_trust wrote:We need term limits for these dinosaurs so we don't have to do this stupid fucking dance everytime one of them dies.
For real

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 4:35 am
by simple schoolboy
Is dying on the Court the norm is is Sandra Day O'connoring the norm? Historically of course.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Sat September 19, 2020 4:39 am
by verb_to_trust
I think anyone who ascends to that level of power is a borderline sociopath who isn't going to get the same satisfaction out of playing golf and being really rich like a more normal person would aspire to do. More times than not, they will cling to power until their last breath.