durdencommatyler wrote:I agree with Argo. The move has nothing to do with the health of art. Also, I'm not against this move. I think it's a great move, actually. But that's separate from my feelings on how the move relates to what art is or isn't or should be or whatever.
So much wrong in one post
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 9:14 pm
by LoathedVermin72
BurtReynolds wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:I agree with Argo. The move has nothing to do with the health of art. Also, I'm not against this move. I think it's a great move, actually. But that's separate from my feelings on how the move relates to what art is or isn't or should be or whatever.
So much wrong in one post
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 10:31 pm
by epilogue
BurtReynolds wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:I agree with Argo. The move has nothing to do with the health of art. Also, I'm not against this move. I think it's a great move, actually. But that's separate from my feelings on how the move relates to what art is or isn't or should be or whatever.
So much wrong in one post
Opinions and view points and personal feelings being as wrong as they possibly can be, sure.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 10:31 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:I agree with Argo. The move has nothing to do with the health of art. Also, I'm not against this move. I think it's a great move, actually. But that's separate from my feelings on how the move relates to what art is or isn't or should be or whatever.
So much wrong in one post
Good talk, guys.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 10:32 pm
by The Argonaut
I don't agree with the post Durden made where he says he agrees with me, by the way.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 10:39 pm
by epilogue
The Argonaut wrote:I don't agree with the post Durden made where he says he agrees with me, by the way.
Which part do you disagree with?
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 10:40 pm
by The Argonaut
durdencommatyler wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:I don't agree with the post Durden made where he says he agrees with me, by the way.
Which part do you disagree with?
Everything after "Argo."
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 10:45 pm
by epilogue
The Argonaut wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:I don't agree with the post Durden made where he says he agrees with me, by the way.
Which part do you disagree with?
Everything after "Argo."
Good talk, Argo.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 10:52 pm
by The Argonaut
lol, no one wants to engage with you. Dont take it personally, I think they're just sleepy or something.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 10:56 pm
by epilogue
No harm, no foul, Ash.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 10:56 pm
by The Argonaut
you bastard
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 21, 2016 10:59 pm
by epilogue
I disagree.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Tue December 27, 2016 5:01 pm
by B
Here's a fun super cut of all the 2016 movies.
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Tue December 27, 2016 5:05 pm
by Jorge
Wow they really got every single one of them
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Posted: Wed December 28, 2016 2:16 am
by B
theplatypus wrote:Wow they really got every single one of them
