Page 124 of 300

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Thu February 25, 2016 4:03 am
by Mecca
numbers wrote:Ambrose IS the top guy, at least right now. If you eliminate part-timers, who is getting a better reaction than him?

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Fri February 26, 2016 2:49 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
undertaker is going to be on raw next week...are we going to get a heel turn or a refusal to wrestle for vince?

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:40 pm
by Mecca
I really enjoyed Dean Ambrose last night

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:45 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
Mecca wrote:I really enjoyed Dean Ambrose last night
i only half wathed, but i was bored 37 seconds into his promo sitting in the chair

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 7:24 pm
by numbers
I think it's funny that they've pulled Reigns off of TV until Wrestlemania because the crowd hates him, and they are pushing Ambrose in his absence and the crowd loves him, and then when Reigns comes back Ambrose will probably go back to being Reigns sidekick.

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 7:40 pm
by Mecca
numbers wrote:I think it's funny that they've pulled Reigns off of TV until Wrestlemania because the crowd hates him, and they are pushing Ambrose in his absence and the crowd loves him, and then when Reigns comes back Ambrose will probably go back to being Reigns sidekick.
The smart thing would be to have him beat HHH and face Roman at mania.

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 7:40 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
numbers wrote:I think it's funny that they've pulled Reigns off of TV until Wrestlemania because the crowd hates him, and they are pushing Ambrose in his absence and the crowd loves him, and then when Reigns comes back Ambrose will probably go back to being Reigns sidekick.
yeah..considering the crowd cheered hhh when he beat down reigns, and the opposite occurred when hhh beat down ambrose

not that i like either of them, but wwe will just continue to ignore this

i want rollins to go main babyface soon after his return anyway

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 7:58 pm
by numbers
Mecca wrote:
numbers wrote:I think it's funny that they've pulled Reigns off of TV until Wrestlemania because the crowd hates him, and they are pushing Ambrose in his absence and the crowd loves him, and then when Reigns comes back Ambrose will probably go back to being Reigns sidekick.
The smart thing would be to have him beat HHH and face Roman at mania.
I would have Ambrose win, and then have Ambrose-Lesnar be for the title.

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 11:31 pm
by Mecca
numbers wrote:
Mecca wrote:
numbers wrote:I think it's funny that they've pulled Reigns off of TV until Wrestlemania because the crowd hates him, and they are pushing Ambrose in his absence and the crowd loves him, and then when Reigns comes back Ambrose will probably go back to being Reigns sidekick.
The smart thing would be to have him beat HHH and face Roman at mania.
I would have Ambrose win, and then have Ambrose-Lesnar be for the title.
ambrose can just do both matches. he's a madman, maggle!

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 12:09 am
by numbers
Assuming Ambrose doesn't win the title, I would have his match with Brock be as brutal as they can get away with with Ambrose being "unconscious" for the finish like Austin-Bret Hart.

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 3:36 pm
by daft twat
Went to a house show last night in minne. Charlotte got busted open on the apron. Blood everywhere. No contest. Cuz they need another star out right now.

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 4:39 pm
by numbers
daft twat wrote:Went to a house show last night in minne. Charlotte got busted open on the apron. Blood everywhere. No contest. Cuz they need another star out right now.
They'll stop a match at a house show that they'd let finish on TV. As long as it's just that she got busted open, she'll be fine.

I did read that Emma got legit knocked out at an NXT show last night.

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sun March 06, 2016 1:28 am
by BigRedLedbetter
numbers wrote:
Mecca wrote:
numbers wrote:I think it's funny that they've pulled Reigns off of TV until Wrestlemania because the crowd hates him, and they are pushing Ambrose in his absence and the crowd loves him, and then when Reigns comes back Ambrose will probably go back to being Reigns sidekick.
The smart thing would be to have him beat HHH and face Roman at mania.
I would have Ambrose win, and then have Ambrose-Lesnar be for the title.
I would like this.

Then have HHH say the winner of Ambrose/Lesnar and HHH/Reigns be for the title at Mania. So the title would be defended twice. One last way to try and screw Ambrose and Reigns. I could see something clusterfucky like that happening.

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sun March 06, 2016 2:26 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
BigRedLedbetter wrote:
numbers wrote:
Mecca wrote:
numbers wrote:I think it's funny that they've pulled Reigns off of TV until Wrestlemania because the crowd hates him, and they are pushing Ambrose in his absence and the crowd loves him, and then when Reigns comes back Ambrose will probably go back to being Reigns sidekick.
The smart thing would be to have him beat HHH and face Roman at mania.
I would have Ambrose win, and then have Ambrose-Lesnar be for the title.
I would like this.

Then have HHH say the winner of Ambrose/Lesnar and HHH/Reigns be for the title at Mania. So the title would be defended twice. One last way to try and screw Ambrose and Reigns. I could see something clusterfucky like that happening.
stop leaving me you piece of sh*t

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sun March 06, 2016 7:30 pm
by AndySlash
daft twat wrote:Went to a house show last night in minne. Charlotte got busted open on the apron. Blood everywhere. No contest. Cuz they need another star out right now.

hey, i was there, too, the first time in probably 10-15 years i went to a non-televised event. picked up $72 tix for $20 on the target center site the day of the show. only 3,000 people or so, which was kind of surprising, but they have been here a lot it seems in the past few years, most recently for raw a little over two month ago.

miz/styles opened. match wasn't great, but it was cool to see styles in person for the first time. miz was hilarious at the start, doing a rick rude impression in rude's home state ('what i'd like right now is for all you fat, out-of-shape...') before getting in an argument with a guy dressed as deadpool in the front row. deadpool made it even funnier by casually putting on his headphones while miz was yelling at him.

ambrose/owens was the pre-intermission match. it was my first time seeing owens, too. at one point he called out a guy sitting by himself a few rows up in the stands who was wearing a unicorn horn. that was one thing that was cool about the house show - a lot more crowd interaction by the wrestlers than at the tv events.

sucked that the women's match ended the way it did. i think charlotte has been pretty good since the heel turn, and lynch won me over with her royal rumble match. so i was looking forward to seeing what they'd do here but charlotte's injury happened only a couple minutes in and that was that. lynch was visibly concerned and so you felt bad for both of them in that situation. looks like charlotte wrestled the next night, so nothing major.

main event was a relatively ho-hum kane/bray wyatt street fight. match was fine for what it was, and crowd was into it once the weapons showed up. match ended with kane putting wyatt through a table to send the crowd home happy.

styles over miz
swagger/young over axel/rose
ryback over neville
new day over usos
ambrose over owens by dq
-intermission-
charlotte and lynch was a no contest
kalisto over sheamus
kane over wyatt

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sun March 06, 2016 7:34 pm
by tommymtcom
So is the shane undertaker match leading up to a new brand split?

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sun March 06, 2016 9:51 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
tommymtcom wrote:So is the shane undertaker match leading up to a new brand split?
i'd be interested to see this since i wasn't watching during the previous brand split

was raw only 2 hours when they did this before?

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sun March 06, 2016 11:15 pm
by numbers
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
tommymtcom wrote:So is the shane undertaker match leading up to a new brand split?
i'd be interested to see this since i wasn't watching during the previous brand split

was raw only 2 hours when they did this before?
Yeah, it was. In fact, I think moving to the 3 hour Raw is what ended it.

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sun March 06, 2016 11:18 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
numbers wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
tommymtcom wrote:So is the shane undertaker match leading up to a new brand split?
i'd be interested to see this since i wasn't watching during the previous brand split

was raw only 2 hours when they did this before?
Yeah, it was. In fact, I think moving to the 3 hour Raw is what ended it.
was raw also 3 hours when nitro was? i feel like i remember nitro going to it first, then raw followed a little bit after

Re: Official WWE/Pro Wrestling thread

Posted: Sun March 06, 2016 11:25 pm
by numbers
Raw was 2 hours when Nitro was 3, I don't think they went to the 3 hour Raw until like 2012.