Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Wed March 24, 2021 2:51 pm
Captain Marvel
what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
ha, i didn't like the cinematography. too busy and too much malick. though i'm with you on mulligan.Mickey wrote:Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
The Dig is "excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare", but it still works because it's kind of nice just to spend 90 minutes with Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes. Compelling actors can really bump a movie up from forgettable waste of time to fine.Malloy wrote:ha, i didn't like the cinematography. too busy and too much malick. though i'm with you on mulligan.Mickey wrote:Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
lately i have more contempt for excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare than "badly made" movies
"fine" is a totally fair appraisal of this movieThe Argonaut wrote:The Dig is "excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare", but it still works because it's kind of nice just to spend 90 minutes with Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes. Compelling actors can really bump a movie up from forgettable waste of time to fine.Malloy wrote:ha, i didn't like the cinematography. too busy and too much malick. though i'm with you on mulligan.Mickey wrote:Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
lately i have more contempt for excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare than "badly made" movies
you’re such an assholeMalloy wrote:"fine" is a totally fair appraisal of this movieThe Argonaut wrote:The Dig is "excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare", but it still works because it's kind of nice just to spend 90 minutes with Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes. Compelling actors can really bump a movie up from forgettable waste of time to fine.Malloy wrote:ha, i didn't like the cinematography. too busy and too much malick. though i'm with you on mulligan.Mickey wrote:Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
lately i have more contempt for excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare than "badly made" movies
i wasn't trying to be!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:you’re such an assholeMalloy wrote:"fine" is a totally fair appraisal of this movieThe Argonaut wrote:The Dig is "excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare", but it still works because it's kind of nice just to spend 90 minutes with Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes. Compelling actors can really bump a movie up from forgettable waste of time to fine.Malloy wrote:ha, i didn't like the cinematography. too busy and too much malick. though i'm with you on mulligan.Mickey wrote:Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
lately i have more contempt for excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare than "badly made" movies
right...Malloy wrote:i wasn't trying to be!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:you’re such an assholeMalloy wrote:"fine" is a totally fair appraisal of this movieThe Argonaut wrote:The Dig is "excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare", but it still works because it's kind of nice just to spend 90 minutes with Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes. Compelling actors can really bump a movie up from forgettable waste of time to fine.Malloy wrote:ha, i didn't like the cinematography. too busy and too much malick. though i'm with you on mulligan.Mickey wrote:Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
lately i have more contempt for excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare than "badly made" movies
You leave Malloy alone!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:right...Malloy wrote:i wasn't trying to be!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:you’re such an assholeMalloy wrote:"fine" is a totally fair appraisal of this movieThe Argonaut wrote:The Dig is "excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare", but it still works because it's kind of nice just to spend 90 minutes with Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes. Compelling actors can really bump a movie up from forgettable waste of time to fine.Malloy wrote:ha, i didn't like the cinematography. too busy and too much malick. though i'm with you on mulligan.Mickey wrote:Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
lately i have more contempt for excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare than "badly made" movies
back offepilogue wrote:You leave Malloy alone!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:right...Malloy wrote:i wasn't trying to be!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:you’re such an assholeMalloy wrote:"fine" is a totally fair appraisal of this movieThe Argonaut wrote:The Dig is "excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare", but it still works because it's kind of nice just to spend 90 minutes with Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes. Compelling actors can really bump a movie up from forgettable waste of time to fine.Malloy wrote:ha, i didn't like the cinematography. too busy and too much malick. though i'm with you on mulligan.Mickey wrote:Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
lately i have more contempt for excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare than "badly made" movies
Oh what are you gonna do? Put your legs behind your head at me?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:back offepilogue wrote:You leave Malloy alone!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:right...Malloy wrote:i wasn't trying to be!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:you’re such an assholeMalloy wrote:"fine" is a totally fair appraisal of this movieThe Argonaut wrote:The Dig is "excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare", but it still works because it's kind of nice just to spend 90 minutes with Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes. Compelling actors can really bump a movie up from forgettable waste of time to fine.Malloy wrote:ha, i didn't like the cinematography. too busy and too much malick. though i'm with you on mulligan.Mickey wrote:Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
lately i have more contempt for excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare than "badly made" movies
probablyepilogue wrote:Oh what are you gonna do? Put your legs behind your head at me?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:back offepilogue wrote:You leave Malloy alone!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:right...Malloy wrote:i wasn't trying to be!lennytheweedwhacker wrote:you’re such an assholeMalloy wrote:"fine" is a totally fair appraisal of this movieThe Argonaut wrote:The Dig is "excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare", but it still works because it's kind of nice just to spend 90 minutes with Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes. Compelling actors can really bump a movie up from forgettable waste of time to fine.Malloy wrote:ha, i didn't like the cinematography. too busy and too much malick. though i'm with you on mulligan.Mickey wrote:Curious as to what you disliked. I enjoyed it even if it wasn't great. The plot dragged a bit in the second half, but Mulligan is really good as usual, and the cinematography was beautiful.Malloy wrote:what did you think of this movie? i watched some of it and really disliked what i saw.Mickey wrote:The Dig
lately i have more contempt for excessively milquetoast, competently middlebrow fare than "badly made" movies