Red Mosquito

stip wrote:

harmless wrote:

theplatypus wrote:

evenslow wrote:Mark Richards Interviews Pearl Jam

http://www.theherald.com.au/story/18193 ... tos-video/

I enjoyed this, by the way. I'm a little baffled that they're appearing so much more human for this press go-around than for Backspacer's. It's as if I like hearing from them again.

why can't I find the video for this?

It's in the article if you click the link.

harmless wrote:

stip wrote:

harmless wrote:

stip wrote:

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:

harmless wrote:

Lament wrote:

harmless wrote:Well, some people will, I'll just leave it, it doesn't matter.

For what it's worth, I get it.

Honestly, what else do you think they mean by "unique" in this instance? It's not that he's from the world of sports and they're from the world of music. The media has pushed the "Pearl Jam is friends with sports dudes!" angle ad nauseam since day one (Jack McDowell, Shawn Kemp, Dennis Rodman, Kelly Slater, Pete Sampras, Kerry Wood, Peter Gammons, Theo Epstein, etc.).

I think you're justified in being pissed off, harmless.

Cheers Lament.

It's the same old shtick time and again: rather than just an interviewer, he's a guy afflicted with a disease, who happens to be a "huge fan" who is having his life's treat, meeting PJ. The fact that he's an ex-football player and thus a sports celebrity is a footnote in this case. It's infantilisation. Mike is clumsy with his words, so I don't expect any different from him, but I'm far too used to able-bodied people talking about how great it is to be around disabled people because we are so "inspiring". That's great, Mike, but hopefully he's cool to be around just because he is? I'm talking about portrayal, because the media will always give you a version of reality, not the whole thing. And this is a formulaic one I'm very used to. It's a charitable narrative but ultimately not a particularly respectful one.

You know, I think I can understand your viewpoint. Able-bodied people are often patronising to people that disabled. I've caught myself doing it before, and it feels terrible.

It's an easy habit to fall into, instead of just treating that person the same regardless of their disability. Isn't there a saying, something like 'see the person, not the disability?'. But, there is often this feeling of needing to be extra nice, and give special treatment, to someone with a disability. I think it's mainly because that person got dealt a shitty hand, and I feel bad for them.

A former student of mine was in a wheelchair. We never talked about it, and when he wanted to get in and out of the office I'd hold the door because it was easier for him. That was about it. But there are times I wondered if he wanted it acknowledged. Like the time a friend told me he was gay and i said I didn't care

So I'm a bit late to this so would anyone still be interested in my answer to it?

go for it:)

I did! Big post.

I'm catching up! I was about to delete this post and then you had to go and quote it

stip wrote:

harmless wrote:

stip wrote:

harmless wrote:

stip wrote:

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:

harmless wrote:

Lament wrote:

harmless wrote:Well, some people will, I'll just leave it, it doesn't matter.

For what it's worth, I get it.

Honestly, what else do you think they mean by "unique" in this instance? It's not that he's from the world of sports and they're from the world of music. The media has pushed the "Pearl Jam is friends with sports dudes!" angle ad nauseam since day one (Jack McDowell, Shawn Kemp, Dennis Rodman, Kelly Slater, Pete Sampras, Kerry Wood, Peter Gammons, Theo Epstein, etc.).

I think you're justified in being pissed off, harmless.

Cheers Lament.

It's the same old shtick time and again: rather than just an interviewer, he's a guy afflicted with a disease, who happens to be a "huge fan" who is having his life's treat, meeting PJ. The fact that he's an ex-football player and thus a sports celebrity is a footnote in this case. It's infantilisation. Mike is clumsy with his words, so I don't expect any different from him, but I'm far too used to able-bodied people talking about how great it is to be around disabled people because we are so "inspiring". That's great, Mike, but hopefully he's cool to be around just because he is? I'm talking about portrayal, because the media will always give you a version of reality, not the whole thing. And this is a formulaic one I'm very used to. It's a charitable narrative but ultimately not a particularly respectful one.

You know, I think I can understand your viewpoint. Able-bodied people are often patronising to people that disabled. I've caught myself doing it before, and it feels terrible.

It's an easy habit to fall into, instead of just treating that person the same regardless of their disability. Isn't there a saying, something like 'see the person, not the disability?'. But, there is often this feeling of needing to be extra nice, and give special treatment, to someone with a disability. I think it's mainly because that person got dealt a shitty hand, and I feel bad for them.

A former student of mine was in a wheelchair. We never talked about it, and when he wanted to get in and out of the office I'd hold the door because it was easier for him. That was about it. But there are times I wondered if he wanted it acknowledged. Like the time a friend told me he was gay and i said I didn't care

So I'm a bit late to this so would anyone still be interested in my answer to it?

go for it:)

I did! Big post.

I'm catching up! I was about to delete this post and then you had to go and quote it

harmless wrote:All we said was that it was badly-written, which it was.

every time I read an uninteresting review from someone who has heard the album already I die a little bit inside

harmless wrote:

stip wrote:

harmless wrote:

theplatypus wrote:

evenslow wrote:Mark Richards Interviews Pearl Jam

http://www.theherald.com.au/story/18193 ... tos-video/

I enjoyed this, by the way. I'm a little baffled that they're appearing so much more human for this press go-around than for Backspacer's. It's as if I like hearing from them again.

why can't I find the video for this?

It's in the article if you click the link.

where? I am sorry I'm such an idiot but I literally can't find it.

stip wrote:

harmless wrote:

stip wrote:

harmless wrote:

theplatypus wrote:

evenslow wrote:Mark Richards Interviews Pearl Jam

http://www.theherald.com.au/story/18193 ... tos-video/

I enjoyed this, by the way. I'm a little baffled that they're appearing so much more human for this press go-around than for Backspacer's. It's as if I like hearing from them again.

why can't I find the video for this?

It's in the article if you click the link.

where? I am sorry I'm such an idiot but I literally can't find it.

Underneath this bolded bit at the foot of the article:

Pearl Jam release their new album, Lightning Bolt, on October 14, and will headline The Big Day Out in Auckland (January 17), the Gold Coast (January 19), Melbourne (January 24), Sydney (January 26), Adelaide (January 31), and Perth (February 2).

There's a picture of Ed and Stone with a play button.

ah ha! I never moused over it

so vitalogy is the album they wish they could have spent more time with?

I totally relate to the kids thing. I have to do that with everything in my life

Interesting how pearl jam seems to have made peace with the fact that the world cares about them because of Eddie.

I would love to hear matt talk someday about the differences between soundgarden and pearl jam in terms of writing and band dynamics.

good response to 'is it harder to write a song when you're rich and happy than when you're poor and pissed off'

Still no leak? Wow

evenslow wrote:Mark Richards Interviews Pearl Jam

http://www.theherald.com.au/story/18193 ... tos-video/

Jesus christ eds voice is deep at the start there. If Jeff keeps dissing vitalogy and no code like that hes gonna lose his position as 'the best one', also the way he says "it might be unprecedented! " when theyre talking about working with ed is hilarious. I always feel like they're selling themselves short when they talk about working with ed, too much time hanging with BoB telling them theyd never make a decent album without him. I like hearing stone talk, he always sounds like hes got his shit together.

I kinda wish ed had been in the last interview so we could hear him answer stupid questions about stones crocs and pronouncing milk, hes always serious. I bet he has a little book of metaphors he can use for song writing and injects them into interviews for shits and giggles, until someone calls him out. The kids thing makes total sense, but I hope ed can get his mad scientist on occasionally.

stupidmop wrote:

evenslow wrote:Mark Richards Interviews Pearl Jam

http://www.theherald.com.au/story/18193 ... tos-video/

Jesus christ eds voice is deep at the start there. If Jeff keeps dissing vitalogy and no code like that hes gonna lose his position as 'the best one', also the way he says "it might be unprecedented! " when theyre talking about working with ed is hilarious. I always feel like they're selling themselves short when they talk about working with ed, too much time hanging with BoB telling them theyd never make a decent album without him. I like hearing stone talk, he always sounds like hes got his shit together.

I dunno. However we much we might hate it, given the speculative mythologies we write around the members of the band, I really think it sounds like Jeff and Stone are just giving their own opinions here. I really don't think they're going to let Brendan put words in their mouths, and I think we could tell if they were lying. I always found PJ very publicly respectful to one another and embarrassingly humble, sometimes. They're no stranger to selling themselves short, which is why they sunk into (relative) obscurity instead of becoming the most famous rock band of the century.

harmless wrote:

stupidmop wrote:

evenslow wrote:Mark Richards Interviews Pearl Jam

http://www.theherald.com.au/story/18193 ... tos-video/

Jesus christ eds voice is deep at the start there. If Jeff keeps dissing vitalogy and no code like that hes gonna lose his position as 'the best one', also the way he says "it might be unprecedented! " when theyre talking about working with ed is hilarious. I always feel like they're selling themselves short when they talk about working with ed, too much time hanging with BoB telling them theyd never make a decent album without him. I like hearing stone talk, he always sounds like hes got his shit together.

I dunno. However we much we might hate it, given the speculative mythologies we write around the members of the band, I really think it sounds like Jeff and Stone are just giving their own opinions here. I really don't think they're going to let Brendan put words in their mouths, and I think we could tell if they were lying. I always found PJ very publicly respectful to one another and embarrassingly humble, sometimes. They're no stranger to selling themselves short, which is why they sunk into (relative) obscurity instead of becoming the most famous rock band of the century.

I love how humble they are, each and every one of them! Not just in this interview, but in general.

groetjes,
Mirella

Lol yeah I dont really think it was brenden, just using it as another excuse to bitch/make a dig at him.

Mirella wrote:

harmless wrote:

stupidmop wrote:

evenslow wrote:Mark Richards Interviews Pearl Jam

http://www.theherald.com.au/story/18193 ... tos-video/

Jesus christ eds voice is deep at the start there. If Jeff keeps dissing vitalogy and no code like that hes gonna lose his position as 'the best one', also the way he says "it might be unprecedented! " when theyre talking about working with ed is hilarious. I always feel like they're selling themselves short when they talk about working with ed, too much time hanging with BoB telling them theyd never make a decent album without him. I like hearing stone talk, he always sounds like hes got his shit together.

I dunno. However we much we might hate it, given the speculative mythologies we write around the members of the band, I really think it sounds like Jeff and Stone are just giving their own opinions here. I really don't think they're going to let Brendan put words in their mouths, and I think we could tell if they were lying. I always found PJ very publicly respectful to one another and embarrassingly humble, sometimes. They're no stranger to selling themselves short, which is why they sunk into (relative) obscurity instead of becoming the most famous rock band of the century.

I love how humble they are, each and every one of them! Not just in this interview, but in general.

groetjes,
Mirella

And I'm about as cynical as you can get when it comes to guessing what PJ *really feels* when they say stuff. IIRC, what Jeff called "unprecedented" wasn't Ed's leadership skills but his ability to get the entire band involved in songwriting, which is really the opposite of an "Oh Great Leader" comment.

I like the deepness of Ed's talking voice. Two other notes: he mentions his drinking problem again. Should we be worried? And he said the word 'overwhelmed' and that made me think of this thread . And if he would use a computer more, I would guess he would love the multiple tabs in Firefox, just like the 'open' type writers.

groetjes,
Mirella

p.s.: am I the only one who still uses the colourful tabs extension?

Imagine the computer crashes and he loses an entire albums worth of lyrics!

stupidmop wrote:Imagine the computer crashes and he loses an entire albums worth of lyrics!

I would really like some tetas today, team.
G'morning

TETAS...

Has Matt spoken in these interviews...haha...