Red Mosquito

Bi_3 wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:The UK’s Cass report has been released:

https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj.q837?s=08

Damning and hopeful at the same time.

Press release: The Cass Review is bad science and should not be taken seriously by policymakers

https://transactual.org.uk/blog/2024/04 ... anfKmX516k

It’s a very difficult subject, but what Dr Cass has done is expose the absence of evidence that the affirmation first model is appropriate for and effective in children, and her recommendations for additional research before resuming chemical treatment paths in children are very reasonable.

Cass, a past president of Britain’s Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, is clear about the mission of her report: “This review is not about defining what it means to be trans, nor is it about undermining the validity of trans identities, challenging the right of people to express themselves or rolling back on people’s rights to health care. It is about what the health care approach should be, and how best to help the growing number of children and young people who are looking for support from the N.H.S. in relation to their gender identity.

Bi_3 wrote:Yeah, I just wanted to point out that Nex was not murdered in the bathroom. Nex was clearly failed by everyone in their life that should have been protecting them regardless of identity

Bi_3 wrote:Brooks in the NYT on the NHS’ Cass Report:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/18/opin ... =url-share

Cass, a past president of Britain’s Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, is clear about the mission of her report: “This review is not about defining what it means to be trans, nor is it about undermining the validity of trans identities, challenging the right of people to express themselves or rolling back on people’s rights to health care. It is about what the health care approach should be, and how best to help the growing number of children and young people who are looking for support from the N.H.S. in relation to their gender identity.

Ms Harmless wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:Brooks in the NYT on the NHS’ Cass Report:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/18/opin ... =url-share

Cass, a past president of Britain’s Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, is clear about the mission of her report: “This review is not about defining what it means to be trans, nor is it about undermining the validity of trans identities, challenging the right of people to express themselves or rolling back on people’s rights to health care. It is about what the health care approach should be, and how best to help the growing number of children and young people who are looking for support from the N.H.S. in relation to their gender identity.

did you see what I posted about the Cass Report being an unethical bunch of bullshit?

B wrote:How does one blindly randomize gender affirming care?

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:How does one blindly randomize gender affirming care?

Top post on this page bro.

B wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:How does one blindly randomize gender affirming care?

Top post on this page bro.

Sigh.

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:How does one blindly randomize gender affirming care?

Top post on this page bro.

Sigh.

It’s all good, everyone gets it wrong sometimes, and on this topic in particular it’s easy to be misled by malicious activists like c4rbell0. But if you interested in understanding the X thread above explains how the report assessed and weighed the various studies and what the recommendations actually were… vs what the for-profit activist class claims it says.

Ms Harmless wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:How does one blindly randomize gender affirming care?

Top post on this page bro.

Sigh.

It’s all good, everyone gets it wrong sometimes, and on this topic in particular it’s easy to be misled by malicious activists like c4rbell0. But if you interested in understanding the X thread above explains how the report assessed and weighed the various studies and what the recommendations actually were… vs what the for-profit activist class claims it says.

who is the "for-profit activist class"?

B wrote:

Ms Harmless wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

B wrote:How does one blindly randomize gender affirming care?

Top post on this page bro.

Sigh.

It’s all good, everyone gets it wrong sometimes, and on this topic in particular it’s easy to be misled by malicious activists like c4rbell0. But if you interested in understanding the X thread above explains how the report assessed and weighed the various studies and what the recommendations actually were… vs what the for-profit activist class claims it says.

who is the "for-profit activist class"?

You didn't get your check this month?

Bi_3 wrote:The UK’s Cass report has been released:

https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj.q837?s=08

Damning and hopeful at the same time.

Yale Report Slams Cass Review: 'Misrepresents Data' on Transgender Youth

The report found that the Cass Review contains “serious methodological flaws, including the omission of key findings.”