Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 17, 2014 12:54 am
Yes a shame Gwynn wasn't mentioned. Instead, Fox being Fox had to create drama with that whole Wainwright thing.
Seriously! That is FOX for you. What a joke of a network.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yes a shame Gwynn wasn't mentioned. Instead, Fox being Fox had to create drama with that whole Wainwright thing.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah but cmon skitch, Gwynn meant just as much to the Padres fans as Jeter does to yankees fans. If the names were reversed you know there would be a huge shitstorm. #eastcoastbias
To be honest it all boils down to the fact that Fox was covering the game. The only thing that got that game ratings that night was Jeter. People weren't tuning in to see a Gwynn tribute and MLB and Fox knew it.@SkitchP wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah but cmon skitch, Gwynn meant just as much to the Padres fans as Jeter does to yankees fans. If the names were reversed you know there would be a huge shitstorm. #eastcoastbias
No question. But Jeter was alive and at the game- his last one. He is the only guaranteed hall of famer playing. Of course they'll fawn over him, especially given the #eastcoastbias factor. And trust me, i couldn't stand the Jeter love. But why is fawning over a guy playing in the game being equated to honoring one who died? Instead of the Jeter love I would have preferred talking for 5 minutes about Scott Kazmir, or Pat Neshek. Or Freddie Freemans awful glasses. Something in the game, not a prepacked death package that is only going to grow year after year.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:To be honest it all boils down to the fact that Fox was covering the game. The only thing that got that game ratings that night was Jeter. People weren't tuning in to see a Gwynn tribute and MLB and Fox knew it.@SkitchP wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah but cmon skitch, Gwynn meant just as much to the Padres fans as Jeter does to yankees fans. If the names were reversed you know there would be a huge shitstorm. #eastcoastbias
No question. But Jeter was alive and at the game- his last one. He is the only guaranteed hall of famer playing. Of course they'll fawn over him, especially given the #eastcoastbias factor. And trust me, i couldn't stand the Jeter love. But why is fawning over a guy playing in the game being equated to honoring one who died? Instead of the Jeter love I would have preferred talking for 5 minutes about Scott Kazmir, or Pat Neshek. Or Freddie Freemans awful glasses. Something in the game, not a prepacked death package that is only going to grow year after year.
numbers wrote:If joe buck wasn't involved, it would be a lot more tolerable.
Yeah but you didn't answer my question about Freeman's glasses.@SkitchP wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:To be honest it all boils down to the fact that Fox was covering the game. The only thing that got that game ratings that night was Jeter. People weren't tuning in to see a Gwynn tribute and MLB and Fox knew it.@SkitchP wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah but cmon skitch, Gwynn meant just as much to the Padres fans as Jeter does to yankees fans. If the names were reversed you know there would be a huge shitstorm. #eastcoastbias
No question. But Jeter was alive and at the game- his last one. He is the only guaranteed hall of famer playing. Of course they'll fawn over him, especially given the #eastcoastbias factor. And trust me, i couldn't stand the Jeter love. But why is fawning over a guy playing in the game being equated to honoring one who died? Instead of the Jeter love I would have preferred talking for 5 minutes about Scott Kazmir, or Pat Neshek. Or Freddie Freemans awful glasses. Something in the game, not a prepacked death package that is only going to grow year after year.
See I believe MLB and Fox on it, for the reasons I mentioned. Pretty much every awards show/event that has a "In Memorium" segment gets blasted the next day by somewhere for leaving people out- and that's only a problem that's going to get worse. So by forgoing it entirely, they're going to get blasted at the beginning, and then ultimately people won't miss them. Let the players do their own little homages here and there and move on.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah but you didn't answer my question about Freeman's glasses.@SkitchP wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:To be honest it all boils down to the fact that Fox was covering the game. The only thing that got that game ratings that night was Jeter. People weren't tuning in to see a Gwynn tribute and MLB and Fox knew it.@SkitchP wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah but cmon skitch, Gwynn meant just as much to the Padres fans as Jeter does to yankees fans. If the names were reversed you know there would be a huge shitstorm. #eastcoastbias
No question. But Jeter was alive and at the game- his last one. He is the only guaranteed hall of famer playing. Of course they'll fawn over him, especially given the #eastcoastbias factor. And trust me, i couldn't stand the Jeter love. But why is fawning over a guy playing in the game being equated to honoring one who died? Instead of the Jeter love I would have preferred talking for 5 minutes about Scott Kazmir, or Pat Neshek. Or Freddie Freemans awful glasses. Something in the game, not a prepacked death package that is only going to grow year after year.
See I believe MLB and Fox on it, for the reasons I mentioned. Pretty much every awards show/event that has a "In Memorium" segment gets blasted the next day by somewhere for leaving people out- and that's only a problem that's going to get worse. So by forgoing it entirely, they're going to get blasted at the beginning, and then ultimately people won't miss them. Let the players do their own little homages here and there and move on.

Seriously. I mean their farm system is really good as it stands now but you gotta sign that kid especially when they drafted him over guys like Carlos Rodon, Kyle Schwarber and Max Pentecost who would have been easier to sign.Chris_H_2 wrote:What a shit show in Houston . . .
Is MLB turning into MLS with all this whining?philpritchard wrote:So it looks like Colby Lewis is adding to the unwritten rules of baseball with this new "not allowed to bunt against the shift when there are two outs in the fifth inning of a 2-0 game" thing.