Re: 10th album rumors and speculation
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 4:29 am
It's not a hat. It's a new album title rumour.stip wrote:that's not a bad hat
It's not a hat. It's a new album title rumour.stip wrote:that's not a bad hat
I'm adding it to my wishlist.stip wrote:that's not a bad hat
Yeah, but it's OBVIOUSLY not their account.dkfan9 wrote:yeah, but it's probably not their account.LetMeSleep wrote:pearljamonline
Pearl Jam's new album to be titled “X”? #PJRumors #NPJA #PearlJam
This is what was posted. If that is PJs account then it's more than a rumour
I'm not saying it doesn't have deeper meaning... but speaking from a designer standpoint, that X technique with letters in each quadrant is a trendy thing going around right now. It's probably just a random design for that hat.beat wrote:It would be appropriate, seeing how it will be their 10th album.evenslow wrote:Count me all in for this thing being called X.
bodysnatcher wrote:I'm not saying it doesn't have deeper meaning... but speaking from a designer standpoint, that X technique with letters in each quadrant is a trendy thing going around right now. It's probably just a random design for that hat.beat wrote:It would be appropriate, seeing how it will be their 10th album.evenslow wrote:Count me all in for this thing being called X.
Farmer John wrote:New rumour:
The new Pearl Jam album to be titled "Seattle"?
melonhead4 wrote:Farmer John wrote:New rumour:
The new Pearl Jam album to be titled "Seattle"?
Where did you find that? It does look like a logical extension of BS.......
BurtReynolds wrote:2013 better be an incredible year surpassing all others if I'm gonna buy a band hat that so prominently features the date on it.
I'm pretty much expecting not to like it, based on the last 2 and a half albums and ed's current voice. However i really want to like it, so i wish something would hurry up and leak and blow my mind already.harmless wrote:I don't have hopes, because I have no idea what I'm expecting.
It would be nice if it was better than S/T and Backpacer. Even slightly better. That'll do at this point. But I have no high expectations in terms of songs. They haven't written a song I could seriously latch onto as being important to me since, well, Riot Act really.
with Soundgarden i would think yes...Mike has been in the studio with them, played live with them...he even hinted that Matt was a beast with SG live.dimejinky99 wrote:Having seen ed play with qotsa in South America, I'm left wondering, do pj listen to qotsa or soundgardens records and go ok, we have to top that!
They obviously see them as contemporaries but I wonder if they listen to them or are influenced by them, either creatively or competitively?
That's fine and true, rhetorically, but the fact is that on the whole he's boring and, well, unimpressive with PJ. So I'm not surprised he's making them raise their eyebrows when he goes and kicks ass with another band. It's kind of like losing your wife to another guy and finding out that he blows her mind in a way you never could.dimejinky99 wrote:That's not a revelation, we all know how big a beast matt actually is, possibly too much the beast for PJ.
wouldn't it be more like losing your wife to another guy and finding out she does with him all kinds of naughty things she never wanted to do with you?harmless wrote:That's fine and true, rhetorically, but the fact is that on the whole he's boring and, well, unimpressive with PJ. So I'm not surprised he's making them raise their eyebrows when he goes and kicks ass with another band. It's kind of like losing your wife to another guy and finding out that he blows her mind in a way you never could.dimejinky99 wrote:That's not a revelation, we all know how big a beast matt actually is, possibly too much the beast for PJ.
mastaflatch wrote:bodysnatcher wrote:I'm not saying it doesn't have deeper meaning... but speaking from a designer standpoint, that X technique with letters in each quadrant is a trendy thing going around right now. It's probably just a random design for that hat.beat wrote:It would be appropriate, seeing how it will be their 10th album.evenslow wrote:Count me all in for this thing being called X.

i lol'd hard at thatbroken iris wrote:melonhead4 wrote:Farmer John wrote:New rumour:
The new Pearl Jam album to be titled "Seattle"?
Where did you find that? It does look like a logical extension of BS.......
It looks like Boom checking out Ed's wife.
yeah, actually thats what Mike said...harmless wrote:That's fine and true, rhetorically, but the fact is that on the whole he's boring and, well, unimpressive with PJ. So I'm not surprised he's making them raise their eyebrows when he goes and kicks ass with another band. It's kind of like losing your wife to another guy and finding out that he blows her mind in a way you never could.dimejinky99 wrote:That's not a revelation, we all know how big a beast matt actually is, possibly too much the beast for PJ.
Um... I was hoping that was implied.Heathen wrote:wouldn't it be more like losing your wife to another guy and finding out she does with him all kinds of naughty things she never wanted to do with you?harmless wrote:That's fine and true, rhetorically, but the fact is that on the whole he's boring and, well, unimpressive with PJ. So I'm not surprised he's making them raise their eyebrows when he goes and kicks ass with another band. It's kind of like losing your wife to another guy and finding out that he blows her mind in a way you never could.dimejinky99 wrote:That's not a revelation, we all know how big a beast matt actually is, possibly too much the beast for PJ.