Red Mosquito

@SkitchP wrote:really houston?

again. nothing predictable about this year's picks. Pats are taking Ertz, i called it months ago!

Yeh, as far as I can tell La Canfora is the only one really tweeting early

@SkitchP wrote:Yeh, as far as I can tell La Canfora is the only one really tweeting early

thank you for this

Green Habit wrote:I'd be happy with either of the Williamses.

GH is happy, team.

Green Habit wrote:

elliseamos wrote:my guesses:

gb - eddie lacy
hou - robert woods
den - jesse williams
ne - sylvester williams

I'd be happy with either of the Williamses.

Jesse would be good for the Pats, he and Wilfork together would be scary.

looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down

Vikings trade up in the Pats spot. Schefter said earlier that the Vikes are angling for...ah, you can probably figure it out.

elliseamos wrote:based on this trend, i'm thinking the patriots will gain more picks and not add to their team tonight.

from hours ago.

i got something right guys. i'm going to bed.

holy sh@t... pats got a boatload there.

--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down

Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.

Green Habit wrote:

--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down

Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.

even money says they move back up in the second round

Green Habit wrote:Vikings trade up in the Pats spot. Schefter said earlier that the Vikes are angling for...ah, you can probably figure it out.

Nope.

I guessed wrong too.

--- wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down

Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.

even money says they move back up in the second round

right.

so NE ends up with five of the first 102 picks

elliseamos wrote:

--- wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down

Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.

even money says they move back up in the second round

right.

With what? Next years 1st? They dont have any 3rds to move back into the 2nd.

@SkitchP wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

--- wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down

Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.

even money says they move back up in the second round

right.

With what? Next years 1st? They dont have any 3rds to move back into the 2nd.

they have two thirds, bro

--- wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

--- wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down

Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.

even money says they move back up in the second round

right.

With what? Next years 1st? They dont have any 3rds to move back into the 2nd.

they have two thirds, bro

Hmm. The NFL network guys said they wouldnt pick again until saturday. My mistake.

@SkitchP wrote:

--- wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

--- wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down

Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.

even money says they move back up in the second round

right.

With what? Next years 1st? They dont have any 3rds to move back into the 2nd.

they have two thirds, bro

Hmm. The NFL network guys said they wouldnt pick again until saturday. My mistake.

they were talking about the vikings

my fear is this will work out like the Greg? jennings trade when the pats ended up w/ chad flippin' jackson.

--- wrote:so NE ends up with five of the first 102 picks

But Minnesota ended up with three of the first 29 picks. I think both teams made out in good shape.

--- wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

--- wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

--- wrote:

Green Habit wrote:

--- wrote:looks like i will be wrong, pats might move down

Schefter also said that the Vikes would give up a 2, 3, and 4 to move up. That would be good, but that would also mean that the Pats move way down in the draft. I was glad that the Broncos didn't move down that far.

even money says they move back up in the second round

right.

With what? Next years 1st? They dont have any 3rds to move back into the 2nd.

they have two thirds, bro

Hmm. The NFL network guys said they wouldnt pick again until saturday. My mistake.

they were talking about the vikings

Oh. I thought you were too.