R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by Bammer »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:i like my rock stars angry and depressed.

this happy, having-a-good-time stuff is for Monkees fans.
I have news for you.

The Monkees and their fans are/were miserable cunts.

No different from Beatles fans or anything else.
While that may be mostly true I don’t think it’s fair to wrap Peter Tork into that generalization.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40170
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by wease »

numbers wrote:Fuck now I actually do want to hear them cover daydream believer
Stepping Stone or gtfo
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by Strat »




:luv: :luv: :luv:
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by numbers »

Strat wrote:


:luv: :luv: :luv:
See this was awesome.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35444
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by spike »

Bammer wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Pretty sure they're trying to provide fun and stable jobs for their friends
I feel like at some point in the last ten years this became one of the primary reason they're still an active band.

I imagine the obligations that brings must be difficult to manage - knowing that if they decided to split, they're putting their friends out of work. Easier to stick together in the most low obligation way possible, play a handful of shows every year, etc - it's not like it's hard work and it also allows them to fund causes they're passionate about.
They (Ed?) have spoken about how it’s a huge entity/enterprise now and they employ a bunch of people and provide their livelihood, and feel responsible for those peoples’ well-being.

I’m paraphrasing.
collectively, the five core members are worth hundreds of millions. couldn't they just all chip in a few million and set up all the crew for life and call it a day?
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by B »

This is getting close.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by Bammer »

spike wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Pretty sure they're trying to provide fun and stable jobs for their friends
I feel like at some point in the last ten years this became one of the primary reason they're still an active band.

I imagine the obligations that brings must be difficult to manage - knowing that if they decided to split, they're putting their friends out of work. Easier to stick together in the most low obligation way possible, play a handful of shows every year, etc - it's not like it's hard work and it also allows them to fund causes they're passionate about.
They (Ed?) have spoken about how it’s a huge entity/enterprise now and they employ a bunch of people and provide their livelihood, and feel responsible for those peoples’ well-being.

I’m paraphrasing.
collectively, the five core members are worth hundreds of millions. couldn't they just all chip in a few million and set up all the crew for life and call it a day?
Mind. Blown.
Spoiler: show
Not touring would really dig into the tax deductions that Ed has gotten used to while traveling though.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
knee tunes
for those who
are not...shall be
Posts: 8505
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 7:30 am
Location: nothing

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by knee tunes »

scottmusic wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:There is absolutely zero chance the band sends memes and .gifs to each other in a group chat. And the idea of them not wanting to tarnish their legacy is insane. Even with the Jamily worshipping them there is surely a level of understanding that nobody has liked any of their new music for decades now.
Considering Matt wished Ed Happy Birthday on Instagram last week, I don’t think chances are zero.
good morning
Vitalogist wrote:As a hotel manager, you can imagine the amount of beige I’ve seen in my career.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by 96583UP »

maybe a new band can be formed with new people and be Pearl Jam. young people. and we start anew
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

*dry retch*
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51786
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

You know, for all the dumb posting over at the Pit, there are some good points over there in the main holiday single thread that is on the first page. Basically putting these out now doesn't represent any new revenue to them, while the single/album/RSD release do. They've already gotten our money for these singles. They don't seem scared about any lawsuits. It is basically them (the band? management?) being greedy, lazy, or both. Either way, it is a hug FUCK YOU to a loyal fanbase.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by Ms Harmless »

I'd rather they concentrate on making decent albums than making shitty fan club singles any kind of priority
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by Birds in Hell »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:You know, for all the dumb posting over at the Pit, there are some good points over there in the main holiday single thread that is on the first page. Basically putting these out now doesn't represent any new revenue to them, while the single/album/RSD release do. They've already gotten our money for these singles. They don't seem scared about any lawsuits. It is basically them (the band? management?) being greedy, lazy, or both. Either way, it is a hug FUCK YOU to a loyal fanbase.
Yeah, I agree.

Not delivering on membership benefits that were paid for (while they continue to churn out other merchandise) is really indefensible.

They should probably just refund those analog members their fees for those years at this point.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51786
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Ms Harmless wrote:I'd rather they concentrate on making decent albums than making shitty fan club singles any kind of priority
7 years between albums, pretty sure they have a day to put together two singles and send to fans that paid for a product they were promised.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
rimb
A Return To Form
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 11:09 am

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by rimb »

Birds in Hell wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:You know, for all the dumb posting over at the Pit, there are some good points over there in the main holiday single thread that is on the first page. Basically putting these out now doesn't represent any new revenue to them, while the single/album/RSD release do. They've already gotten our money for these singles. They don't seem scared about any lawsuits. It is basically them (the band? management?) being greedy, lazy, or both. Either way, it is a hug FUCK YOU to a loyal fanbase.
Yeah, I agree.

Not delivering on membership benefits that were paid for (while they continue to churn out other merchandise) is really indefensible.

They should probably just refund those analog members their fees for those years at this point.
This is probably the most likely outcome at this point sadly.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by 96583UP »

$20 a person more for an analog membership x 100,000 memberships = $2 million per 100k analog members per year -> prob like 300,000k analog members -> 2 years undelivered singles (or is it 3?) -> est. $12 million received by 10C for records never issued
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by bune »

rimb wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:You know, for all the dumb posting over at the Pit, there are some good points over there in the main holiday single thread that is on the first page. Basically putting these out now doesn't represent any new revenue to them, while the single/album/RSD release do. They've already gotten our money for these singles. They don't seem scared about any lawsuits. It is basically them (the band? management?) being greedy, lazy, or both. Either way, it is a hug FUCK YOU to a loyal fanbase.
Yeah, I agree.

Not delivering on membership benefits that were paid for (while they continue to churn out other merchandise) is really indefensible.

They should probably just refund those analog members their fees for those years at this point.
This is probably the most likely outcome at this point sadly.
that's not even close to likely barring a class action of some point. Tim's gotta eat his burritos, man.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by Birds in Hell »

bune wrote:
rimb wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:You know, for all the dumb posting over at the Pit, there are some good points over there in the main holiday single thread that is on the first page. Basically putting these out now doesn't represent any new revenue to them, while the single/album/RSD release do. They've already gotten our money for these singles. They don't seem scared about any lawsuits. It is basically them (the band? management?) being greedy, lazy, or both. Either way, it is a hug FUCK YOU to a loyal fanbase.
Yeah, I agree.

Not delivering on membership benefits that were paid for (while they continue to churn out other merchandise) is really indefensible.

They should probably just refund those analog members their fees for those years at this point.
This is probably the most likely outcome at this point sadly.
that's not even close to likely barring a class action of some point. Tim's gotta eat his burritos, man.
Oh, I absolutely don't expect they would ever refund people those fees, even if I think that's the responsible thing to do at this point.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by 96583UP »

Birds in Hell wrote:
bune wrote:
rimb wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:You know, for all the dumb posting over at the Pit, there are some good points over there in the main holiday single thread that is on the first page. Basically putting these out now doesn't represent any new revenue to them, while the single/album/RSD release do. They've already gotten our money for these singles. They don't seem scared about any lawsuits. It is basically them (the band? management?) being greedy, lazy, or both. Either way, it is a hug FUCK YOU to a loyal fanbase.
Yeah, I agree.

Not delivering on membership benefits that were paid for (while they continue to churn out other merchandise) is really indefensible.

They should probably just refund those analog members their fees for those years at this point.
This is probably the most likely outcome at this point sadly.
that's not even close to likely barring a class action of some point. Tim's gotta eat his burritos, man.
Oh, I absolutely don't expect they would ever refund people those fees, even if I think that's the responsible thing to do at this point.
I don’t think they have $10 million in cash they are just sitting on to give back

better to just make some ass-quality plastic disc for 5 cents a piece and mail them out
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: R.I.P. Ten Club Singles (1991-2018)

Post by bune »

I'm reminded of the cereal-box records that were all the rage when I was growing up.

Image
Post Reply