Re: Nine Inch Nails | Hesitation Marks
Posted: Thu September 05, 2013 8:47 pm
Oh, and... think Industrial club music. This thing would come alive with huge speakers in a big hall.
Nail on the head right here.harmless wrote:He's playing with ambience, rhythm production and samples more than ever before on a vocal album. Headphones and full concentration are essential. It's like Ghosts, as far as I know it, but with little flourishes and influences from PHM, Year Zero and The Fragile. It never gets fully angry, it holds itself back, as if Trent is clenching his teeth rather than biting. There's also a fair bit of downbeat depressing stuff with no intention to get angry. In that sense, 'Hesitation Marks' seems like the perfect title. It's a slow-burner... less 'Somewhat Damaged' than 'Almost Damaged.'Bob Loblaw wrote:Yeah, it does get better. The beats and rhythms crawl up on you slowly with each listen. There's a lot of subtle stuff going on in each track.southp wrote:Glad to hear that because after my first two listens I wasn't too impressed.
I will be starting this very loudly, very shortly... I very well know it isn't the same (house to hall) but my woofer just got kicked up a few notches.harmless wrote:Oh, and... think Industrial club music. This thing would come alive with huge speakers in a big hall.
Yup, pretty much.oasisfan35 wrote:Nail on the head right here.harmless wrote:He's playing with ambience, rhythm production and samples more than ever before on a vocal album. Headphones and full concentration are essential. It's like Ghosts, as far as I know it, but with little flourishes and influences from PHM, Year Zero and The Fragile. It never gets fully angry, it holds itself back, as if Trent is clenching his teeth rather than biting. There's also a fair bit of downbeat depressing stuff with no intention to get angry. In that sense, 'Hesitation Marks' seems like the perfect title. It's a slow-burner... less 'Somewhat Damaged' than 'Almost Damaged.'Bob Loblaw wrote:Yeah, it does get better. The beats and rhythms crawl up on you slowly with each listen. There's a lot of subtle stuff going on in each track.southp wrote:Glad to hear that because after my first two listens I wasn't too impressed.
verb_to_trust wrote:Everything didn't make it onto the ipod. Shame it ruins side 2 of the vinyl...
Everything works as the song that is deleted from the tracklist, never to heard again.harmless wrote:The album is superb. 'Everything' works as an indulgent palate-cleanser before the less instant, more dour and depressing second half.
I SURVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEEEEEDTyler Durden wrote:I don't entirely get the hate people have for "Everything"; it's not THAT bad. People seem to forget some of Trent's less than stellar moments from the past...
"Starfuckers, Inc." was a giant steaming pile of mall goth garbage.
And the first half of "The Perfect Drug" (before the drum breakdown) was pure cheese.
Yeah, "In Two" is my favourite song on the album.verb_to_trust wrote:Lets quit talking about that shitty song and talk more about how awesome "In Two" is, which happened to help me win a 5k yesterday
It's a stellar album and 'In Two' feels really timeless. It'll go down as a great NIN song.Tyler Durden wrote:Yeah, "In Two" is my favourite song on the album.verb_to_trust wrote:Lets quit talking about that shitty song and talk more about how awesome "In Two" is, which happened to help me win a 5k yesterday
Autotune has become like fake breasts, highly enjoyable when done correctly.harmless wrote:So much blatant autotune. It's funny.
POTDsurfndestroy wrote:Autotune has become like fake breasts, highly enjoyable when done correctly.