Page 14 of 15

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Fri February 12, 2016 10:29 pm
by Green Habit
Kaius wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/BBsN17qp4Xl/

Not at all surprising, but it will still be odd to see him in a different uniform. So, where does Forte end up? A playoff contender, surely.
A lot of Broncos fans want him, but I don't see how they can fit him into their cap.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Fri February 12, 2016 10:31 pm
by Kaius
It's not really their "style", but Forte in New England could be like soft core football porn.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Fri February 12, 2016 10:34 pm
by EJ
Seahawks, probably.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Sat February 13, 2016 12:47 am
by spike
EJ wrote:Seahawks, probably.
gotta think they'll go with rawls

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 3:25 pm
by Fuck You Jobu
Kaius wrote:It's not really their "style", but Forte in New England could be like soft core football porn.
What do you mean not their style? Forte could have another 100 catch season there. And hate it again.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 4:40 pm
by Kaius
Fuck You Jobu wrote:
Kaius wrote:It's not really their "style", but Forte in New England could be like soft core football porn.
What do you mean not their style? Forte could have another 100 catch season there. And hate it again.
As in they don't typically go after 30 year old free agent running backs, especially if they have to get in a bidding war with another team that will surely pay more than he's worth at this point.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 4:48 pm
by Green Habit
Kaius wrote:As in they don't typically go after 30 year old free agent running backs, especially if they have to get in a bidding war with another team that will surely pay more than he's worth at this point.
Corey Dillon turned 30 the year the Patriots traded a 2nd round pick for him.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 4:58 pm
by Kaius
I thought about that, but trading a pick is a bit more circumstantial than going after high profile offensive weapons on the FA market. I think there are a handful of teams that will make Forte very player friendly offers. I just don't see the Pats being one of them.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 5:00 pm
by Green Habit
Kaius wrote:I thought about that, but trading a pick is a bit more circumstantial than going after high profile offensive weapons on the FA market. I think there are a handful of teams that will make Forte very player friendly offers. I just don't see the Pats being one of them.
I think it's unlikely too, but I wouldn't rule it out.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 5:03 pm
by Fuck You Jobu
Green Habit wrote:
Kaius wrote:As in they don't typically go after 30 year old free agent running backs, especially if they have to get in a bidding war with another team that will surely pay more than he's worth at this point.
Corey Dillon turned 30 the year the Patriots traded a 2nd round pick for him.
Steven Jackson was 32 when they signed him.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 5:26 pm
by Kaius
"High profile offense weapons"

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 5:27 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
You almost have to be a good pass-catching back to get paid in the league now. Forte will find a nice paycheck somewhere because of his skillz.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 5:28 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
It is one of the reasons I hope Tampa doesn't over pay for Martin, his hands are awful.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 5:31 pm
by Kaius
Tampa is one of the teams I see making an honest effort for Forte.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 5:58 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Kaius wrote:Tampa is one of the teams I see making an honest effort for Forte.
I wouldn't mind if they didn't re-sign Martin, kept Sims, and signed Forte.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 6:35 pm
by Green Habit
E.H. Ruddock wrote:It is one of the reasons I hope Tampa doesn't over pay for Martin, his hands are awful.
This was really disguised well when he was at BSU. Very easy to do when Kellen Moore is your QB.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 7:31 pm
by Fuck You Jobu
Kaius wrote:"High profile offense weapons"
How often is a RB > 30 considered "High profile offense weapons"? My guess is not often, so no teams, much less the Patriots, get into a bidding war for them.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon February 29, 2016 2:57 am
by ElenaDavis
"Dear friends, check my last article about The Chicago Bears on my blog <a href=""http://collegeessayhelper.weebly.com/"">http://collegeessayhelper.weebly.com/</a>

Waiting for your feedbacks! I am sure you will like it!"

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon March 14, 2016 4:44 pm
by Kaius
Another sneaky good offseason for the Bears. I like what Pace and Fox are doing with FA'cy. they've addressed the biggest weaknesses on the team with proven solid, young talent. It should give them some flexibility in the draft to go best available.

Re: The Chicago Bears

Posted: Mon March 14, 2016 5:14 pm
by Fuck You Jobu
Kaius wrote:Another sneaky good offseason for the Bears. I like what Pace and Fox are doing with FA'cy. they've addressed the biggest weaknesses on the team with proven solid, young talent. It should give them some flexibility in the draft to go best available.
Another good offseason? Not so sure on that.

Though I do like what they've done so far. The defense should be pretty decent last year. They were mediocre last year and horrible against the run This could help them become top 10.