Page 14 of 51

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 7:55 pm
by Walker Bait
Chris_H_2 wrote:This is the definitive cover of Cheap Trick's "The Flame."

Now excuse me while I go dry hump my 8th-grade girlfriend.

DUDE! I was just thinking I heard he same thing!

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 7:57 pm
by Chris_H_2
Walker Bait wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:This is the definitive cover of Cheap Trick's "The Flame."

Now excuse me while I go dry hump my 8th-grade girlfriend.

DUDE! I was just thinking I heard he same thing!
Will you hold me while we watch St. Elmo's Fire together?

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 7:57 pm
by OmegaprimeVKM
bodysnatcher wrote:i really can't wait to hear this now

Image

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:03 pm
by harmless
dimejinky99 wrote:I think that lyric is 'wherein this grace...' Not 'wound...'
This might well be right. If you're sure, PM stip.

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:05 pm
by harmless
OmegaprimeVKM wrote:I don't know if we should scapegoat Brendan O'Brien but this is fucking drudgery of the highest kind.

The band has become the caricature that everyone claims that they are. It's really not good. The best we can hope for is that this passes unnoticed and people remember this band as the ones who produced Red Mosquito, Bu$hleaguer and Not For You
I never gave a fuck what people claimed PJ were, and still don't.

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:06 pm
by Walker Bait
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Walker Bait wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:This is the definitive cover of Cheap Trick's "The Flame."

Now excuse me while I go dry hump my 8th-grade girlfriend.

DUDE! I was just thinking I heard he same thing!
Will you hold me while we watch St. Elmo's Fire together?
Only if i can run my fingers thru your hair during the good parts. :lol:

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:10 pm
by Lounge Lizard
Would this fit Brian Adam's catalog?

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:10 pm
by harmless
Lounge Lizard wrote:Would this fit Brian Adam's catalog?
Possibly.

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:15 pm
by Dugg
The more I listen to this fucker the more I think the band let Eddie down here. The music just doesn't rise to level of the vocals to me, not even close. Maybe the whole band was confused too. I fully expect them to perfect the power ballad on their next album.

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:20 pm
by mackeycold
Can anyone explain to me Pearl Jam's strategy here? Somewhat connected at rdio.com put the song up for multiple hours. It gets everywhere to major radio stations linking it to consequence of sound to stereogum and etc. A ton of Pearl Jam's big fans have heard it. So they try and pretend as if the leak never happened, get the song taken down, and then be like we're premiering it for the first time on sirius thursday! Wouldn't it have been smarter financially speaking for them to have taken command of the leak, putting it on iTunes, and giving every radio station the go to play it? Maybe even putting another song out. Bands like QOTSA and NIN (just to name a few) have countered leaks by putting up the stream on iTunes, where they know the hardcore fans will go for sound quality (at least before the album officially hits), and casual fans and possible converts will find it and maybe listen in. PJ is like Nuh uh we're totally premiering it on Thursday and oh by the way, we're revoking memberships for some of you. Anyway, great tune. 12 string sounds cool, Ed's on, and Matt is terrific as well. Reminds me of Pink Floyd's poppier stuff (Wish you Were Here, Mother, Comfortably Numb), a bit of Automatic for the People era R.E.M., Springsteen, etc. I think this could be a smash hit on rock radio too.

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:22 pm
by stupidmop
mackeycold wrote:Can anyone explain to me Pearl Jam's strategy here? Somewhat connected at rdio.com put the song up for multiple hours. It gets everywhere to major radio stations linking it to consequence of sound to stereogum and etc. A ton of Pearl Jam's big fans have heard it. So they try and pretend as if the leak never happened, get the song taken down, and then be like we're premiering it for the first time on sirius thursday! Wouldn't it have been smarter financially speaking for them to have taken command of the leak, putting it on iTunes, and giving every radio station the go to play it? Maybe even putting another song out. Bands like QOTSA and NIN (just to name a few) have countered leaks by putting up the stream on iTunes, where they know the hardcore fans will go for sound quality (at least before the album officially hits), and casual fans and possible converts will find it and maybe listen in. PJ is like Nuh uh we're totally premiering it on Thursday and oh by the way, we're revoking memberships for some of you. Anyway, great tune. 12 string sounds cool, Ed's on, and Matt is terrific as well. Reminds me of Pink Floyd's poppier stuff (Wish you Were Here, Mother, Comfortably Numb), a bit of Automatic for the People era R.E.M., Springsteen, etc. I think this could be a smash hit on rock radio too.
Pearl jam r stupid.

They don't know how this shit works. It's like they're stuck in....the.....80s

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:23 pm
by i got bugs
OFFER OR REQUEST FOR BANNED OR COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE MATERIAL DELETED. PLEASE DO NOT REPOST. - THE MANAGEMENT

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:24 pm
by bodysnatcher
mackeycold wrote:Can anyone explain to me Pearl Jam's strategy here? Somewhat connected at rdio.com put the song up for multiple hours. It gets everywhere to major radio stations linking it to consequence of sound to stereogum and etc. A ton of Pearl Jam's big fans have heard it. So they try and pretend as if the leak never happened, get the song taken down, and then be like we're premiering it for the first time on sirius thursday! Wouldn't it have been smarter financially speaking for them to have taken command of the leak, putting it on iTunes, and giving every radio station the go to play it? Maybe even putting another song out. Bands like QOTSA and NIN (just to name a few) have countered leaks by putting up the stream on iTunes, where they know the hardcore fans will go for sound quality (at least before the album officially hits), and casual fans and possible converts will find it and maybe listen in. PJ is like Nuh uh we're totally premiering it on Thursday and oh by the way, we're revoking memberships for some of you. Anyway, great tune. 12 string sounds cool, Ed's on, and Matt is terrific as well. Reminds me of Pink Floyd's poppier stuff (Wish you Were Here, Mother, Comfortably Numb), a bit of Automatic for the People era R.E.M., Springsteen, etc. I think this could be a smash hit on rock radio too.
there's probably a deal with Sirius behind it. advertising dollars, etc.

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:25 pm
by unLEASHed
stupidmop wrote:
mackeycold wrote:Can anyone explain to me Pearl Jam's strategy here? Somewhat connected at rdio.com put the song up for multiple hours. It gets everywhere to major radio stations linking it to consequence of sound to stereogum and etc. A ton of Pearl Jam's big fans have heard it. So they try and pretend as if the leak never happened, get the song taken down, and then be like we're premiering it for the first time on sirius thursday! Wouldn't it have been smarter financially speaking for them to have taken command of the leak, putting it on iTunes, and giving every radio station the go to play it? Maybe even putting another song out. Bands like QOTSA and NIN (just to name a few) have countered leaks by putting up the stream on iTunes, where they know the hardcore fans will go for sound quality (at least before the album officially hits), and casual fans and possible converts will find it and maybe listen in. PJ is like Nuh uh we're totally premiering it on Thursday and oh by the way, we're revoking memberships for some of you. Anyway, great tune. 12 string sounds cool, Ed's on, and Matt is terrific as well. Reminds me of Pink Floyd's poppier stuff (Wish you Were Here, Mother, Comfortably Numb), a bit of Automatic for the People era R.E.M., Springsteen, etc. I think this could be a smash hit on rock radio too.
Pearl jam r stupid.

They don't know how this shit works. It's like they're stuck in....the.....80s
maybe its because on Thursday they will release it with a video!!! :roll:

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:26 pm
by Gob
Dugg wrote:The more I listen to this fucker the more I think the band let Eddie down here. The music just doesn't rise to level of the vocals to me, not even close. Maybe the whole band was confused too. I fully expect them to perfect the power ballad on their next album.
At this point in their career, I think the band is like "fuck it, we'll put Dead Kennedy's song and a Bryan Adams song on the same record and people will like it."


I really don't think the band cares what anyone thinks. They may even be just trying to weed out the die hard nutcase fans. :haha:

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:27 pm
by bodysnatcher
Gob wrote:They may even be just trying to weed out the die hard nutcase fans. :haha:
i doubt they'd want 9 people at their concerts

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:29 pm
by Heathen
you can't weed out die hard fans, they're the ones that will stay on board no matter what

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:30 pm
by i got bugs
i got bugs wrote:OFFER OR REQUEST FOR BANNED OR COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE MATERIAL DELETED. PLEASE DO NOT REPOST. - THE MANAGEMENT
i just asked for a pm, all this talk of bryan adams and the flame.. i kinda wanted to have a heart to heart chat.. i wanted no commercially available material, i dunno what youre talking about

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:32 pm
by mackeycold
bodysnatcher wrote:
mackeycold wrote:Can anyone explain to me Pearl Jam's strategy here? Somewhat connected at rdio.com put the song up for multiple hours. It gets everywhere to major radio stations linking it to consequence of sound to stereogum and etc. A ton of Pearl Jam's big fans have heard it. So they try and pretend as if the leak never happened, get the song taken down, and then be like we're premiering it for the first time on sirius thursday! Wouldn't it have been smarter financially speaking for them to have taken command of the leak, putting it on iTunes, and giving every radio station the go to play it? Maybe even putting another song out. Bands like QOTSA and NIN (just to name a few) have countered leaks by putting up the stream on iTunes, where they know the hardcore fans will go for sound quality (at least before the album officially hits), and casual fans and possible converts will find it and maybe listen in. PJ is like Nuh uh we're totally premiering it on Thursday and oh by the way, we're revoking memberships for some of you. Anyway, great tune. 12 string sounds cool, Ed's on, and Matt is terrific as well. Reminds me of Pink Floyd's poppier stuff (Wish you Were Here, Mother, Comfortably Numb), a bit of Automatic for the People era R.E.M., Springsteen, etc. I think this could be a smash hit on rock radio too.
there's probably a deal with Sirius behind it. advertising dollars, etc.
Hmm. True but if that's the case why did somebody either fall asleep at the switch or allow the song to go up period and for as long as it was up for?

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 8:33 pm
by B
i got bugs wrote:
i got bugs wrote:OFFER OR REQUEST FOR BANNED OR COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE MATERIAL DELETED. PLEASE DO NOT REPOST. - THE MANAGEMENT
i just asked for a pm, all this talk of bryan adams and the flame.. i kinda wanted to have a heart to heart chat.. i wanted no commercially available material, i dunno what youre talking about
:lol: Sorry, sometimes we sweep up innocent posts when we're cracking down.