Page 14 of 22

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Thu March 03, 2016 9:42 pm
by Kaius
Meh. His reasoning is sound. Bammer just made the wrong choice. Well, a lot of people made the wrong choice.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Thu March 03, 2016 9:53 pm
by epilogue
His reasoning is sound. I don't disagree. I just like consistency.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 12:14 am
by stip
ill just add an in my tree protest option for each poll

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 1:57 am
by epilogue
Look dude, I don't give a shit what song it is. I'm just asking for consistency. You, by way of your own "rules" and explanations, have turned this into a weird and unnecessary "conspiracy" against one fucking song. And it's so totally stupid.

This is my final word on the whole thing. Talk down to us as much as you want from here on out. I just think it's absurd. It never should have been this way. This is all so blech.

And for the record, I appreciate all you do for RM. I appreciate that you run this thing every year. It's always fun. And none of it really matters. And I'd rather have dumb inconsistent rules than no tournament at all. So...

Thanks! :peace:

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:00 am
by Norah
To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:00 am
by epilogue
cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.
This is exactly what I said, Pete. Thank you.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:05 am
by E.H. Ruddock
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.
This is exactly what I said, Pete. Thank you.
I understood pete better

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:06 am
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.
This is exactly what I said, Pete. Thank you.
I understood pete better
He's better at most things than me.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:06 am
by E.H. Ruddock
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.
This is exactly what I said, Pete. Thank you.
I understood pete better
He's better at most things than me.
I was kidding Joey, you're alright in my book

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:09 am
by Norah
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.
This is exactly what I said, Pete. Thank you.
I understood pete better
He's better at most things than me.
Except living a fulfilling life.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:09 am
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.
This is exactly what I said, Pete. Thank you.
I understood pete better
He's better at most things than me.
I was kidding Joey, you're alright in my book
Thanks friend.

But you were also right. Pete said it better. I could learn a lot from his pithy brevity.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:10 am
by epilogue
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.
This is exactly what I said, Pete. Thank you.
I understood pete better
He's better at most things than me.
Except living a fulfilling life.
Don't say that, buddy.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:11 am
by Norah
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.
This is exactly what I said, Pete. Thank you.
I understood pete better
He's better at most things than me.
Except living a fulfilling life.
Don't say that, buddy.
I'm ok with it.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:12 am
by epilogue
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.
This is exactly what I said, Pete. Thank you.
I understood pete better
He's better at most things than me.
Except living a fulfilling life.
Don't say that, buddy.
I'm ok with it.
I love you Peter N. Clarke.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:13 am
by Norah
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair the way he handled it was in the rules, and I understand the argument for doing it the way he did this time. But I do think it would be better if ties were handled the same way throughout.
This is exactly what I said, Pete. Thank you.
I understood pete better
He's better at most things than me.
Except living a fulfilling life.
Don't say that, buddy.
I'm ok with it.
I love you Peter N. Clarke.
I love you too.

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:14 am
by epilogue
And least this tournament was good for something. :heartbeat:

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:44 am
by PHATJ
stip wrote:And you know how I feel about Australians!
Oi Oi Oi?

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:46 am
by LoathedVermin72
Jesus Christ you guys

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 2:52 am
by LetMeSleep
stip wrote:And you know how I feel about Australians!
Is this because of Mel Gibson?

Re: March Madness 2016! Rules and results

Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 1:31 pm
by stip
Advancing to the semis:
Brain of J
Hail Hail
Go

Eliminated
Last Exit (the fuck, RM)
Faithfull
Red Mosquito


TBD
Rearviewmirror
Sleight of Hand