Re: Flat earth theory
Posted: Fri April 20, 2018 3:50 am
Perhaps you should stay on topic about the truth that is flat earth and stop posting your bullshit lies.
knee tunes wrote:Yeah, stop slamming keys your bullshit lies, Bruce Hornsby
You know it must have aged into coal. I can't think of any other way wood could turn into coal.Noangel wrote:https://me.me/i/500-million-year-old-hammer-iron-hammer-with-fossilized-wood-handle-7549114
The BBC published the archaeologists findings.
500 million year date is a stretch, but to be sure, organic material takes a long fucking time to turn to coal. At least 140 million years.
no...E.H. Ruddock wrote:Noangel, the pyramids were much more than tombs. They were grain silos
Why are you p0sting this song?Noangel wrote:
its a good song.run2death wrote:Why are you p0sting this song?Noangel wrote:
I'm fairly certain you are confused by its meaning.
You know Greg? Graffin is an evolutionary biologist, right?

there are some interesting anomalies in the theory of evolution. Bad Religion is fucking awesome btw.run2death wrote:Why are you p0sting this song?Noangel wrote:
I'm fairly certain you are confused by its meaning.
You know Greg? Graffin is an evolutionary biologist, right?
There is a whole lot of false in thisNoangel wrote:there are some interesting anomalies in the theory of evolution. Bad Religion is fucking awesome btw.run2death wrote:Why are you p0sting this song?Noangel wrote:
I'm fairly certain you are confused by its meaning.
You know Greg? Graffin is an evolutionary biologist, right?
Human beings can trace their lineage back to Lucy, an African female. Every human on the planet. But, if she was the mutation...where are all the offspring and generations that it took to breed out the 'useless' DNA? Where are the generations upon generations that it took to breed Lucy's genes into the mainstream gene pool?
The progression from one species to the next isn't gradual, as logic suggests. Instead it is quite linear....there was Lucy- and then modern man. What's missing are specimens from those centuries of breeding that it would have taken to weed out the non-mutants. Lucy's mutated existence was suddenly the norm. That time in between mutations....Darwinism-and physical evidence- doesn't account for that.
The evidence rarely shows an evolutionary darwin progression, whereby a species mutated, evolved, and was bred into extinction or prominence. Instead it is much more defined...suddenly humans had no fur, suddenly birds had curved beaks, suddenly...
preach away, please. what's wrong with it?E.H. Ruddock wrote:There is a whole lot of false in thisNoangel wrote:there are some interesting anomalies in the theory of evolution. Bad Religion is fucking awesome btw.run2death wrote:Why are you p0sting this song?Noangel wrote:
I'm fairly certain you are confused by its meaning.
You know Greg? Graffin is an evolutionary biologist, right?
Human beings can trace their lineage back to Lucy, an African female. Every human on the planet. But, if she was the mutation...where are all the offspring and generations that it took to breed out the 'useless' DNA? Where are the generations upon generations that it took to breed Lucy's genes into the mainstream gene pool?
The progression from one species to the next isn't gradual, as logic suggests. Instead it is quite linear....there was Lucy- and then modern man. What's missing are specimens from those centuries of breeding that it would have taken to weed out the non-mutants. Lucy's mutated existence was suddenly the norm. That time in between mutations....Darwinism-and physical evidence- doesn't account for that.
The evidence rarely shows an evolutionary darwin progression, whereby a species mutated, evolved, and was bred into extinction or prominence. Instead it is much more defined...suddenly humans had no fur, suddenly birds had curved beaks, suddenly...