Re: Musical Guilty Pleasures.
Posted: Thu January 26, 2023 12:10 am
it's the RM way lolwease wrote:One can separate quality from enjoyment.epilogue wrote:If one enjoys something, how can one also say it sucks?
it's the RM way lolwease wrote:One can separate quality from enjoyment.epilogue wrote:If one enjoys something, how can one also say it sucks?
I mean, I love KISS but much of their music wouldn’t qualify in most anyone’s taste as being quality.epilogue wrote:Go on...wease wrote:One can separate quality from enjoyment.epilogue wrote:If one enjoys something, how can one also say it sucks?
Shock MeJorge wrote:I guarantee there are more people on Earth who consider KISS to be "quality" than Pearl Jam. Who cares?
I like and or enjoy lots of album songs and artist that suck . There are also musical master pieces that are brilliant wonderful works of art that I simply can't stand to here.Ms Harmless wrote:it's the RM way lolwease wrote:One can separate quality from enjoyment.epilogue wrote:If one enjoys something, how can one also say it sucks?
Oh, I totally agree. I was just saying you can acknowledge something as not being great or whatever but still like it. I don’t give a fuck what other people think about what I like.Jorge wrote:I guarantee there are more people on Earth who consider KISS to be "quality" than Pearl Jam. Who cares?
I am who i amwease wrote:Oh, I totally agree. I was just saying you can acknowledge something as not being great or whatever but still like it. I don’t give a fuck what other people think about what I like.Jorge wrote:I guarantee there are more people on Earth who consider KISS to be "quality" than Pearl Jam. Who cares?
Oh man, so muchi got bugs wrote: Christopher cross - the Arthur theme song