Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump
Posted: Sat July 23, 2022 1:02 am
He used to be so normal and cool.
I should be fine with my all meat diet.dad wrote:i'm sorry, burt.
i hope you get to feeling better.
sounds like you'll be joining me and lenny in the poop thread tomorrow.BurtReynolds wrote:I should be fine with my all meat diet.dad wrote:i'm sorry, burt.
i hope you get to feeling better.
Did they do it to your boy or did he break his brain with Benzos?BurtReynolds wrote:It's remarkable to compare him now to the old Peterson in the channel 4 interview. What a work of art that was. Just totally dismantles the "interviewer", but most importantly, he did it with a smile. He was calm, cool, collected, leaning back in his seat, casually destroying all her talking points.
Now he's mad all the time. Angry. Reactive. He's an old 90 lb guy that sounds like Kermit the Frog, not a tough guy! And when he's not angry he's crying. What are you doing? Look what they did to my boy!
One of Donald Trump's favorite newspapers — controlled by his media ally Rupert Murdoch — says Trump is "unworthy to be this country's chief executive again."
I know that. I'm referring to those who follow the moronic Fox News narrative that it's all a bunch of nothing.tragabigzanda wrote:I don’t think anyone is saying “move along” because we don’t think it’s important; it’s simply a foregone conclusion that nothing will happen.
Burt, I do share your pain. That channel 4 interview was one for the ages, and I do think this guy has a a few good messages up his sleeve. I also think it’s worth mentioning that when asked how his newly found fame would end up, he said he would end up ruining it by saying the wrong things.BurtReynolds wrote:It's remarkable to compare him now to the old Peterson in the channel 4 interview. What a work of art that was. Just totally dismantles the "interviewer", but most importantly, he did it with a smile. He was calm, cool, collected, leaning back in his seat, casually destroying all her talking points.
Now he's mad all the time. Angry. Reactive. He's an old 90 lb guy that sounds like Kermit the Frog, not a tough guy! And when he's not angry he's crying. What are you doing? Look what they did to my boy!
I give you obvious, common sense advice every day, yet you still can't hear it! Curious!JuanHamm wrote:He lures people in with a few pieces of obvious, common sense advice.
Still waiting on these unnamed agents to step forward to counter the testimony.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah apparently the SS agents are saying he did not lay his hands on anyone or grab the steering wheel, but he was angry at them for not taking him to the insurrection.
Why need to respond to hearsay?elliseamos wrote:Still waiting on these unnamed agents to step forward to counter the testimony.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah apparently the SS agents are saying he did not lay his hands on anyone or grab the steering wheel, but he was angry at them for not taking him to the insurrection.
I mean, she gave sworn testimony. Isn't that considered more than hearsay? And why anonymously say it's not true, but do nothing thereafter?simple schoolboy wrote:Why need to respond to hearsay?elliseamos wrote:Still waiting on these unnamed agents to step forward to counter the testimony.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah apparently the SS agents are saying he did not lay his hands on anyone or grab the steering wheel, but he was angry at them for not taking him to the insurrection.
Sworn testimony recounting hearsayelliseamos wrote:I mean, she gave sworn testimony. Isn't that considered more than hearsay? And why anonymously say it's not true, but do nothing thereafter?simple schoolboy wrote:Why need to respond to hearsay?elliseamos wrote:Still waiting on these unnamed agents to step forward to counter the testimony.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah apparently the SS agents are saying he did not lay his hands on anyone or grab the steering wheel, but he was angry at them for not taking him to the insurrection.