Red Mosquito

wease wrote:

PHATJ wrote:I'm not a Sessions apologist, I have issues with him and wouldn't mind seeing him replaced, but it seems that meeting with foreign diplomats is a very regular part of his former job. I have little issue with the simple fact that he met with Russian diplomats. I do have a problem with lying under oath. If the evidence proves he intentionally lied under oath, he should go.

He point blank told Al Franken he did not talk to Russia.

Like I said, if he is found to have perjured himself then he should be gone.

Strat wrote:

wease wrote:

PHATJ wrote:I'm not a Sessions apologist, I have issues with him and wouldn't mind seeing him replaced, but it seems that meeting with foreign diplomats is a very regular part of his former job. I have little issue with the simple fact that he met with Russian diplomats. I do have a problem with lying under oath. If the evidence proves he intentionally lied under oath, he should go.

He point blank told Al Franken he did not talk to Russia.

Lets just give the guy a chance. They're all crooked anyway. *Shrugs*

Never said anything of the sort. Your reading comprehension is shitty.

PHATJ wrote:

Strat wrote:

wease wrote:

PHATJ wrote:I'm not a Sessions apologist, I have issues with him and wouldn't mind seeing him replaced, but it seems that meeting with foreign diplomats is a very regular part of his former job. I have little issue with the simple fact that he met with Russian diplomats. I do have a problem with lying under oath. If the evidence proves he intentionally lied under oath, he should go.

He point blank told Al Franken he did not talk to Russia.

Lets just give the guy a chance. They're all crooked anyway. *Shrugs*

Never said anything of the sort. Your reading comprehension is shitty.

"Im not a xxx apologist" "all politicians are crooked as hell" "lets just see what happens"

Thats basically what you said. You accuse me of being partisan yet....?

cutuphalfdead wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:I think you've got to admit that this Russian shit is a little more than just your run of the mill shady politics that both sides are guilty of.

We'll see how it plays out, and what the actual facts are. And I think this kind of stuff happens all of the time on both sides of the isle, and I think the vast majority of these politicians are crooked as hell.

It's so much easier to just think everyone is as bad as everyone else. No distinctions to make, no nuance to work out.

There are a lot of things that the last administration was a part of that I have massive problems with. And there is plenty of nuance, it just may not be necessary to detail them in every post. That being said, if you don't think both sides of the political isle have a large percentage shady/immoral/corrupt members than you aren't paying attention.

PHATJ wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:They'll fit right in with the more than half of democrats who are pro-curbing free hate speech anything they disagree with.

This

BurtReynolds wrote:

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:They'll fit right in with the more than half of democrats who are pro-curbing free hate speech anything they disagree with.

Another deplorable cop-out based on circular logic, one of many feeble attempts at using the liberals beliefs against them.

"I can say or do anything disgusting that I want to and liberals can't do anything about it because free speech! Liberals support free speech right? Yeah, derp."

Along with...

"Why are you judging me for hating niggers? Where's that liberal understanding?"

...and dozens of other mentally retarded replies.

Strat wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

Strat wrote:

wease wrote:

PHATJ wrote:I'm not a Sessions apologist, I have issues with him and wouldn't mind seeing him replaced, but it seems that meeting with foreign diplomats is a very regular part of his former job. I have little issue with the simple fact that he met with Russian diplomats. I do have a problem with lying under oath. If the evidence proves he intentionally lied under oath, he should go.

He point blank told Al Franken he did not talk to Russia.

Lets just give the guy a chance. They're all crooked anyway. *Shrugs*

Never said anything of the sort. Your reading comprehension is shitty.

"Im not a xxx apologist" "all politicians are crooked as hell" "lets just see what happens"

Thats basically what you said. You accuse me of being partisan yet....?

I said I don't like Sessions. I said I have no problem with him being removed, I said he should be investigated, I said that if he was guilty of lying under oath he should be removed. I never said "let's just give Sessions a chance", that quote was specifically about Trump. You are taking it out of context and applying it to someone completely different than I said. And I didn't accuse you of anything. I suggested that your approach may be different if the people involved were people you agreed with politically, and even said that was your right.

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:They'll fit right in with the more than half of democrats who are pro-curbing free hate speech anything they disagree with.

This

BurtReynolds wrote:

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:They'll fit right in with the more than half of democrats who are pro-curbing free hate speech anything they disagree with.

Another deplorable cop-out based on circular logic, one of many feeble attempts at using the liberals beliefs against them.

"I can say or do anything disgusting that I want to and liberals can't do anything about it because free speech! Liberals support free speech right? Yeah, derp."

Along with...

"Why are you judging me for hating niggers? Where's that liberal understanding?"

...and dozens of other mentally retarded replies.

This post is mentally retarded.

PHATJ wrote:

wease wrote:

PHATJ wrote:I'm not a Sessions apologist, I have issues with him and wouldn't mind seeing him replaced, but it seems that meeting with foreign diplomats is a very regular part of his former job. I have little issue with the simple fact that he met with Russian diplomats. I do have a problem with lying under oath. If the evidence proves he intentionally lied under oath, he should go.

He point blank told Al Franken he did not talk to Russia.

Like I said, if he is found to have perjured himself then he should be gone.

What's to be found? It's already been proven he did it. They asked him a question and he said, under oath, "I have never had contact with Russia." But he did. Twice. Doesn't matter what he talked about. He said he never did it, but he very plainly did.

Got a new bumper sticker today...

PHATJ wrote:

Strat wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

Strat wrote:

wease wrote:

PHATJ wrote:I'm not a Sessions apologist, I have issues with him and wouldn't mind seeing him replaced, but it seems that meeting with foreign diplomats is a very regular part of his former job. I have little issue with the simple fact that he met with Russian diplomats. I do have a problem with lying under oath. If the evidence proves he intentionally lied under oath, he should go.

He point blank told Al Franken he did not talk to Russia.

Lets just give the guy a chance. They're all crooked anyway. *Shrugs*

Never said anything of the sort. Your reading comprehension is shitty.

"Im not a xxx apologist" "all politicians are crooked as hell" "lets just see what happens"

Thats basically what you said. You accuse me of being partisan yet....?

I said I don't like Sessions. I said I have no problem with him being removed, I said he should be investigated, I said that if he was guilty of lying under oath he should be removed. I never said "let's just give Sessions a chance", that quote was specifically about Trump. You are taking it out of context and applying it to someone completely different than I said. And I didn't accuse you of anything. I suggested that your approach may be different if the people involved were people you agreed with politically, and even said that was your right.

"Im not an xxx apologist"

And yes, it would be my right, and I would be a fucking moron for acting in such a way.

Strat wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

Strat wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

Strat wrote:

wease wrote:

PHATJ wrote:I'm not a Sessions apologist, I have issues with him and wouldn't mind seeing him replaced, but it seems that meeting with foreign diplomats is a very regular part of his former job. I have little issue with the simple fact that he met with Russian diplomats. I do have a problem with lying under oath. If the evidence proves he intentionally lied under oath, he should go.

He point blank told Al Franken he did not talk to Russia.

Lets just give the guy a chance. They're all crooked anyway. *Shrugs*

Never said anything of the sort. Your reading comprehension is shitty.

"Im not a xxx apologist" "all politicians are crooked as hell" "lets just see what happens"

Thats basically what you said. You accuse me of being partisan yet....?

I said I don't like Sessions. I said I have no problem with him being removed, I said he should be investigated, I said that if he was guilty of lying under oath he should be removed. I never said "let's just give Sessions a chance", that quote was specifically about Trump. You are taking it out of context and applying it to someone completely different than I said. And I didn't accuse you of anything. I suggested that your approach may be different if the people involved were people you agreed with politically, and even said that was your right.

"Im not an xxx apologist"

And yes, it would be my right, and I would be a fucking moron for acting in such a way.

"I'm not a Sessions apologist".Let me translate this simple sentence for you.

I'm not letting him off the hook for doing anything illegal. I'm not personally a fan of his. If found guilty of perjury he must go.

What in the hell don't you understand, strat?

PHATJ agrees with Strat 90%. It isn't enough.

BurtReynolds wrote:PHATJ agrees with Strat 90%. It isn't enough.

In reality I probably very rarely agree with strat. But in this instance it seems he just doesn't understand what an apologist is. That's a different issue.

Look, either you believe that the Soviets have taken over America, or you are against us.

BurtReynolds wrote:Look, either you believe that the Soviets have taken over America, or you are against us.

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:

I just want to call anyone that disagrees with me racist, sexist, homophobic, islamophobic, blah, blah, blah (even if those claims are baseless). Then I want to silence them or threaten them. Then I'll call them fascists (even though it's my behavior that is textbook fascism). Then I'll call myself a progressive and feel superior in every way to everyone else. Then I'll break wind in inhale it as though my excrement smells like a prairie of wildflowers. Then I'll tell you to check your privilege when you call me a snowflake. Then I'll need a safe space.

Guys, this page of the thread is exactly what Putin wants.

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:Got a new bumper sticker today...

Exactly the type of bumper sticker an entry-level, low-energy normie-tier poster would have.