Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump
Posted: Wed July 31, 2024 7:45 pm
This sure was something.wease wrote:Good job, DJT. Insult all the black journalists to their faces.
This sure was something.wease wrote:Good job, DJT. Insult all the black journalists to their faces.
It was a journalist convention though, so why are they not journalists?BurtReynolds wrote:That's exactly what he should do lol. Only a lib would think the best thing to do is sit there and meekly take a brow beating from fucking trash masquerading as a journalist.
Because calling yourself something doesn't make you that something, as the interviewer clearly demonstrates.E.H. Ruddock wrote:It was a journalist convention though, so why are they not journalists?BurtReynolds wrote:That's exactly what he should do lol. Only a lib would think the best thing to do is sit there and meekly take a brow beating from fucking trash masquerading as a journalist.
I saw this post without any context. Then a while later looked on twitter and saw a bunch of clips. Played one while sitting across from my wife - her first question was if it was a comedy sketch...wease wrote:Good job, DJT. Insult all the black journalists to their faces.
She asked him a legitimate question. Basically a “why are you here?” And all he could come up with was “she’s being mean to me.”BurtReynolds wrote:"Why is he disrespecting the journalist who has nothing but contempt for him?! He can't do that! Wait, can he do that? Is that possible?"
LMAOwease wrote:She asked him a legitimate question. Basically a “why are you here?” And all he could come up with was “she’s being mean to me.”BurtReynolds wrote:"Why is he disrespecting the journalist who has nothing but contempt for him?! He can't do that! Wait, can he do that? Is that possible?"

Hopefully that one got a stenographer.BurtReynolds wrote:Because calling yourself something doesn't make you that something, as the interviewer clearly demonstrates.E.H. Ruddock wrote:It was a journalist convention though, so why are they not journalists?BurtReynolds wrote:That's exactly what he should do lol. Only a lib would think the best thing to do is sit there and meekly take a brow beating from fucking trash masquerading as a journalist.
Jesus Christ.
It's kind of hard to argue that code switching is fine and normal but that also racial identity is all encompassing and inescapable.Bi_3 wrote:
She never said she wasn’t black though. If I’m talking to someone from Italy, I’ll say I’m Italian or my family is from Italy. I don’t stand there and then say “ I’m also German French and Scottish”Bi_3 wrote:
he has a right to stand up for himself, but the execution was ridiculous, embarrassing, and racist.BurtReynolds wrote:That's exactly what he should do lol. Only a lib would think the best thing to do is sit there and meekly take a brow beating from fucking trash masquerading as a journalist.
simple schoolboy wrote:Was he supposed to detail exactly what he was responding to in each case she referenced when he was accused of abusing black reporters? What sort of response is warranted when the opening question is effectively:
I'm assured that its digital blackface to use black gifs. Here I am merely being ableist for mocking that Swedish girl on the spectrum.

Not to mention that he agreed to take questions from journalists at the event but barely answered any questions put to him. Utterly embarrassing.spike wrote:he has a right to stand up for himself, but the execution was ridiculous, embarrassing, and racist.BurtReynolds wrote:That's exactly what he should do lol. Only a lib would think the best thing to do is sit there and meekly take a brow beating from fucking trash masquerading as a journalist.