Red Mosquito

B wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:B, why are you perpetuating the patriarchy? Shouldn't you divorce your wife and abandon your children for justice?

My life, my business, schoolboy. Keep your laws off my body.

The Patriarchy is primarily instituted and enforced through legal means? The structure of families is not more significant?

Patriarchy is good and normal for PMC (the good kind of Patriarchy), but family formation is a terrible ill for those of less means or non cis-het couples/ polycules/etc.

What laws do you think I wish to invoke against your body? And how dare you priviledge your body over black and brown BIPOC bodies!?

simple schoolboy wrote:

B wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:B, why are you perpetuating the patriarchy? Shouldn't you divorce your wife and abandon your children for justice?

My life, my business, schoolboy. Keep your laws off my body.

The Patriarchy is primarily instituted and enforced through legal means? The structure of families is not more significant?

Patriarchy is good and normal for PMC (the good kind of Patriarchy), but family formation is a terrible ill for those of less means or non cis-het couples/ polycules/etc.

What laws do you think I wish to invoke against your body? And how dare you priviledge your body over black and brown BIPOC bodies!?

Hypocrites will hypocrite

BurtReynolds wrote:what

Just goes to show that both sides of the political spectrum are idiots.

time would be much better spent registering sympathetic voters in swing states rather than throwing selfish tantrums

blueviper wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:what

Just goes to show that both sides of the political spectrum are idiots.

Liberals are going to make her religion an issue, guys.

B wrote:

blueviper wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:what

Just goes to show that both sides of the political spectrum are idiots.

Liberals are going to make her religion an issue, guys.

Religion is basically intertwined with SCOTUS even though it absolutely should not be. How could it not end up being an issue?

Amy Coney Barrett wrote:Your legal career is but a means to an end, and as Father Jenkins told you this morning, that end is building the kingdom of God.

Who's going to make this about religion?

B wrote:

Amy Coney Barrett wrote:Your legal career is but a means to an end, and as Father Jenkins told you this morning, that end is building the kingdom of God.

Who's going to make this about religion?

Anti-abortion stances are conflated with religion all the time.

Is there anything in ACB's court rulings that should rule her out from being a Supreme Court judge? If not, then as long as Repubs can get her through the process prior to the election date then good for them. I think we need to stop vilifying people/parties for playing by the rules. Vilify the rules, and those who uphold them when they had/have a chance to change them.

Yeah, unless she raped someone, we can't win this fight.

B wrote:

Amy Coney Barrett wrote:Your legal career is but a means to an end, and as Father Jenkins told you this morning, that end is building the kingdom of God.

Who's going to make this about religion?

Woah! That is some Mike Pompeo level thinking.

surfndestroy wrote:

B wrote:

Amy Coney Barrett wrote:Your legal career is but a means to an end, and as Father Jenkins told you this morning, that end is building the kingdom of God.

Who's going to make this about religion?

Anti-abortion stances are conflated with religion all the time.

Is there anything in ACB's court rulings that should rule her out from being a Supreme Court judge? If not, then as long as Repubs can get her through the process prior to the election date then good for them. I think we need to stop vilifying people/parties for playing by the rules. Vilify the rules, and those who uphold them when they had/have a chance to change them.

what do the rules say about Merrick Garland again? I haven't read them in a while...

Having 7 kids should seriously disqualify her. Think of the carbon emissions her kids will release over the course of their lifetimes.

Religion should maybe be aborted.

Strat wrote:Religion should maybe be aborted.

Does this include indigenous people and culture which are tied very close to their spirit belief system?

surfndestroy wrote:

Strat wrote:Religion should maybe be aborted.

Does this include indigenous people and culture which are tied very close to their spirit belief system?

Yea sure why not

Strat wrote:

surfndestroy wrote:

Strat wrote:Religion should maybe be aborted.

Does this include indigenous people and culture which are tied very close to their spirit belief system?

Yea sure why not

I'm sorry strat but you've been cancelled

i don't even care that this woman is pro-life

she is fucking batshit crazy

it's not that she's religious

it's that she's an extremist

who the fuck takes orders from a 'head'?

that's a fundamentalist theocratic construct

not in my country

we don't want no ayatollahs here

if you like biblical times so much move to the middle east

b1tch

and shocker that her husband is her 'head'

and that they have so many children

hmmmmm I wonder what this power of praise club could all really be about hmmmmmmm

oh yeah

pervert weirdos who want to get laid

and have no game

so they have to create a shitty cult to force chicks to do them

I guess People of Praise isn’t that influential in South Bend if they had a gay mayor for 8 years.

with a name like South Bend they better have a gay mayor

even the theocrats insist