Page 134 of 486

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Wed February 15, 2017 11:20 pm
by Jorge

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Wed February 15, 2017 11:43 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Holy fucking Christ

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Wed February 15, 2017 11:44 pm
by VinylGuy
If they get Mel for that, thats it DC is doing everything right.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Wed February 15, 2017 11:46 pm
by LoathedVermin72
VinylGuy wrote:If they get Mel for that, thats it DC is doing everything right.
Oh god, dare I hope again?

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Wed February 15, 2017 11:49 pm
by VinylGuy
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:If they get Mel for that, thats it DC is doing everything right.
Oh god, dare I hope again?
Lets just wait. But Mel Gibson...my god. Fuckin Marvel didnt do it even when Robert Downey Jr ask for it for Iron Man 4...Please god let this happen.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Wed February 15, 2017 11:52 pm
by LoathedVermin72
VinylGuy wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:If they get Mel for that, thats it DC is doing everything right.
Oh god, dare I hope again?
Lets just wait. But Mel Gibson...my god. Fuckin Marvel didnt do it even when Robert Downey Jr ask for it for Iron Man 4...Please god let this happen.
They should go all in. Let him do it R. And leave him the fuck alone after he's hired.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Thu February 16, 2017 5:14 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Thu February 16, 2017 5:18 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I am SO IN.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Thu February 16, 2017 5:24 pm
by Kaius
Looks great.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Thu February 16, 2017 5:28 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
i'll likely watch this film eventually

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Thu February 16, 2017 6:17 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I am SO IN.
lol, that scene at the end with the ax

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Fri February 17, 2017 6:46 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Fri February 17, 2017 6:51 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Malick will never make another good movie.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Fri February 17, 2017 7:12 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Holy shit. After watching that trailer, how can any of you fault me for not liking Gosling? Jesus.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Fri February 17, 2017 7:13 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
It isn't even really him, he's ok I guess, but he is in shitty movies.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Fri February 17, 2017 7:13 pm
by Jorge
From the look of those moshpit scenes the movie takes place in approximately 1996

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Fri February 17, 2017 7:14 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
oh good Natalie Portman too. Please, take my money.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Fri February 17, 2017 7:15 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Fri February 17, 2017 7:16 pm
by Jorge
tragabigzanda wrote:
theplatypus wrote:From the look of those moshpit scenes the movie takes place in approximately 1996
If that's the case, then I'd be fine with that line I jumped on.
There was only a very brief period of time when making albums was really profitable, huh?

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Fri February 17, 2017 7:47 pm
by epilogue
tragabigzanda wrote:The House with Will Ferrell and Amy Poehler looks pretty bad, but I'll definitely watch it:

I have not watched this. But you'll be hard pressed to turn me against any project featuring Amy Poehler. She's a national fucking treasure.