Page 134 of 792
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 1:51 pm
by MattA75
@SkitchP wrote:BigRedLedbetter wrote:I'm assuming with Wainright, Wacha, Lynn and Shelby Miller and Marco Gonzalez probably ready next year (Fuck the Cardinals ugh!) I don't see them making a qualifying offer to Masterson which makes this Rangers fan happy because I'd love to sign him in the offseason but not if it costs us what is looking like will be a top 3-5 pick and I think Mike Maddux could work wonders with him.
cutuphalfdead wrote:Masterson's FIP is well below his ERA, so it's reasonable to expect good things down the stretch.
Agreed. He also had a great year last year while battling through a knee injury which his pitching coach in Cleveland said may have led to his issues this year.
Teams in the top 10 (15 maybe??) dont lose their first round pick as compensation. I believe they just give a supplemental pick at the end of the 1st round to the team that lost the free agent.
Teams drafting in the top 10 don't lose that pick, they lose their next pick (i.e. 2nd round)
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 2:59 pm
by @SkitchP
MattA75 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:BigRedLedbetter wrote:I'm assuming with Wainright, Wacha, Lynn and Shelby Miller and Marco Gonzalez probably ready next year (Fuck the Cardinals ugh!) I don't see them making a qualifying offer to Masterson which makes this Rangers fan happy because I'd love to sign him in the offseason but not if it costs us what is looking like will be a top 3-5 pick and I think Mike Maddux could work wonders with him.
cutuphalfdead wrote:Masterson's FIP is well below his ERA, so it's reasonable to expect good things down the stretch.
Agreed. He also had a great year last year while battling through a knee injury which his pitching coach in Cleveland said may have led to his issues this year.
Teams in the top 10 (15 maybe??) dont lose their first round pick as compensation. I believe they just give a supplemental pick at the end of the 1st round to the team that lost the free agent.
Teams drafting in the top 10 don't lose that pick, they lose their next pick (i.e. 2nd round)
gotcha.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 5:48 pm
by Norah
I'm in the newsroom today and it's always hilarious listening to people who aren't into sports try to make sense of this stuff.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 7:47 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
MattA75 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:BigRedLedbetter wrote:I'm assuming with Wainright, Wacha, Lynn and Shelby Miller and Marco Gonzalez probably ready next year (Fuck the Cardinals ugh!) I don't see them making a qualifying offer to Masterson which makes this Rangers fan happy because I'd love to sign him in the offseason but not if it costs us what is looking like will be a top 3-5 pick and I think Mike Maddux could work wonders with him.
cutuphalfdead wrote:Masterson's FIP is well below his ERA, so it's reasonable to expect good things down the stretch.
Agreed. He also had a great year last year while battling through a knee injury which his pitching coach in Cleveland said may have led to his issues this year.
Teams in the top 10 (15 maybe??) dont lose their first round pick as compensation. I believe they just give a supplemental pick at the end of the 1st round to the team that lost the free agent.
Teams drafting in the top 10 don't lose that pick, they lose their next pick (i.e. 2nd round)
Oh nice. I was not sure how that worked. Thank you.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 7:49 pm
by Norah
Drew to the Yankees.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 7:53 pm
by Norah
And Price to Detroit. It's gonna be one hell of an ALCS this year.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 7:57 pm
by Chris_H_2
I'm guessing Andrew Miller will no longer be trending on Twitter.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 8:18 pm
by elliseamos
considering what TB got for Price. I'm liking the Sox deal much more. Then factor in the Lackey deal, and I have to say that Cherington did extremely well today.
Detroit and Oakland certainly look like favorites in the AL (I'm going to go ahead and sleep on Balt'more). St. Louis certainly helped themselves, but did they catch up with the Dodgers and Brewers? I don't think so, but what do I know.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 8:28 pm
by philpritchard
elliseamos wrote:considering what TB got for Price. I'm liking the Sox deal much more. Then factor in the Lackey deal, and I have to say that Cherington did extremely well today.
Detroit and Oakland certainly look like favorites in the AL (I'm going to go ahead and sleep on Balt'more). St. Louis certainly helped themselves, but did they catch up with the Dodgers and Brewers? I don't think so, but what do I know.
Now there may be a bit of a bias here, but I still think Toronto is the better team. In the next 2-3 weeks, the Jays should get Brett Lawrie, Edwin Encarnacion and Adam Lind off the DL. That's more of an improvement than any team made today.
Of course, that all hinges on rehab going smoothly for those three.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 8:29 pm
by Norah
The Rays are retarded.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 8:41 pm
by elliseamos
philpritchard wrote:elliseamos wrote:considering what TB got for Price. I'm liking the Sox deal much more. Then factor in the Lackey deal, and I have to say that Cherington did extremely well today.
Detroit and Oakland certainly look like favorites in the AL (I'm going to go ahead and sleep on Balt'more). St. Louis certainly helped themselves, but did they catch up with the Dodgers and Brewers? I don't think so, but what do I know.
Now there may be a bit of a bias here, but I still think Toronto is the better team. In the next 2-3 weeks, the Jays should get Brett Lawrie, Edwin Encarnacion and Adam Lind off the DL. That's more of an improvement than any team made today.
Of course, that all hinges on rehab going smoothly for those three.
fine, i'll toss you a bone. i'll sleep on toronto, too.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 8:44 pm
by elliseamos
cutuphalfdead wrote:The Rays are retarded.
the sox did just what i was hoping they'd do, which is that they set the market.
if price is traded first, then lester (and lackey) wouldn't be worth what they were. the uncertainty of whether price would be moved inflated the sox two pitchers.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 8:46 pm
by philpritchard
elliseamos wrote:philpritchard wrote:elliseamos wrote:considering what TB got for Price. I'm liking the Sox deal much more. Then factor in the Lackey deal, and I have to say that Cherington did extremely well today.
Detroit and Oakland certainly look like favorites in the AL (I'm going to go ahead and sleep on Balt'more). St. Louis certainly helped themselves, but did they catch up with the Dodgers and Brewers? I don't think so, but what do I know.
Now there may be a bit of a bias here, but I still think Toronto is the better team. In the next 2-3 weeks, the Jays should get Brett Lawrie, Edwin Encarnacion and Adam Lind off the DL. That's more of an improvement than any team made today.
Of course, that all hinges on rehab going smoothly for those three.
fine, i'll toss you a bone. i'll sleep on toronto, too.

Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 8:46 pm
by Norah
elliseamos wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:The Rays are retarded.
the sox did just what i was hoping they'd do, which is that they set the market.
if price is traded first, then lester (and lackey) wouldn't be worth what they were. the uncertainty of whether price would be moved inflated the sox two pitchers.
The Rays should have gotten A LOT more back for Price.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 9:32 pm
by MattA75
Not enough bad things can happen to the Rays as far as I'm concerned...bunch of crybabies...good luck with David Price Tiger fans
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 9:35 pm
by Norah
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 9:50 pm
by Chris_H_2
Can someone tell me (1) if the Phillies have a plan, and (2) if they do, what that plan is?
Imbeciles . . .
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 10:53 pm
by Coach
elliseamos wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:The Rays are retarded.
the sox did just what i was hoping they'd do, which is that they set the market.
if price is traded first, then lester (and lackey) wouldn't be worth what they were. the uncertainty of whether price would be moved inflated the sox two pitchers.
THIS.
Also, if you judge Cherington just based on today, he gets a solid A. Now....don't get me started about failing to re-sign Lester...I just don't understand that logic. I'm thinking something in the 120-30 range would have gotten it done in Spring Training.
Who was the last Red Sox to actually enter free agency for real and then resign with the team? 'Tek?
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 31, 2014 11:09 pm
by elliseamos
Coach wrote:elliseamos wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:The Rays are retarded.
the sox did just what i was hoping they'd do, which is that they set the market.
if price is traded first, then lester (and lackey) wouldn't be worth what they were. the uncertainty of whether price would be moved inflated the sox two pitchers.
THIS.
Also, if you judge Cherington just based on today, he gets a solid A. Now....don't get me started about failing to re-sign Lester...I just don't understand that logic. I'm thinking something in the 120-30 range would have gotten it done in Spring Training.
Who was the last Red Sox to actually enter free agency
for real and then resign with the team? 'Tek?
that's the key phrase here, b/c i can only think of guys that were in contract years, but weren't allowed to get to FA.
Re: MLB
Posted: Fri August 01, 2014 12:20 am
by BigRedLedbetter
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Hilarious
Yeah I was shocked the Rays didn't get more for Price. Can't believe they didn't get James McCann (catcher) or Crawford (their best pitching prospect)