Page 1333 of 1390

Re: ITT: We convince Harmless to get another dog

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 4:52 pm
by broken iris
stupidmop wrote:
wilkins wrote:
“Lightning Bolt” songs are intended to be played live and you can expect the set lists to be more experimental this tour.

“We’re always trying to gauge how open people are to experimenting with us,” Vedder said. “I kind of through the ether feel like maybe it’s the time to do that (experiment) and I think it might be really interesting in that some interesting, really weird, cool shit might come from that. It’s better to try and fail than to not try at all.”
Aw yea

He just means they'll add Even Flow to the second encore.

Re: ITT: We convince Harmless to get another dog

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 4:53 pm
by wilkins
stip wrote:the steve gleason interviews are really good. he asks good questions. the surfer guy was good. Carrie's interview is definitely a step below those two.
Steve is one of the best interviewer's of the band/Eddie I have seen; Mark was good; Carrie was decent; and Judd sucked.

Re: ITT: We convince Harmless to get another dog

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 4:56 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
wilkins wrote:
stip wrote:the steve gleason interviews are really good. he asks good questions. the surfer guy was good. Carrie's interview is definitely a step below those two.
Steve is one of the best interviewer's of the band/Eddie I have seen; Mark was good; Carrie was decent; and Judd sucked.
Judd?

Re: ITT: We convince Harmless to get another dog

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:01 pm
by ledvedderman
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
wilkins wrote:
stip wrote:the steve gleason interviews are really good. he asks good questions. the surfer guy was good. Carrie's interview is definitely a step below those two.
Steve is one of the best interviewer's of the band/Eddie I have seen; Mark was good; Carrie was decent; and Judd sucked.
Judd?
Yup. Wynonna Judd

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:01 pm
by scrub12
The Eddie interview with Apatow was disappointing. Hopefully a full band one comes out.

Gleason and the surfer did a good job with their questions though.

Re: ITT: We convince Harmless to get another dog

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:01 pm
by stupidmop
broken iris wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
wilkins wrote:
“Lightning Bolt” songs are intended to be played live and you can expect the set lists to be more experimental this tour.

“We’re always trying to gauge how open people are to experimenting with us,” Vedder said. “I kind of through the ether feel like maybe it’s the time to do that (experiment) and I think it might be really interesting in that some interesting, really weird, cool shit might come from that. It’s better to try and fail than to not try at all.”
Aw yea

He just means they'll add Even Flow to the second encore.
Don't get my hopes up like that bro.

Judd apatow is an awful interviewer apparently, and eddie was not on his A-game.

Thinking about it, mark richards and steve gleason were better probably cause they're both pretty big fans it seems. They ask questions from a fan perspective. Judd apatow and carrie brownstein are friends with them first and foremost, I think.

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:04 pm
by ABNorman
I just view these interviews as one big thing which covers a large range of questions.

Re: ITT: We convince Harmless to get another dog

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:06 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
ledvedderman wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
wilkins wrote:
stip wrote:the steve gleason interviews are really good. he asks good questions. the surfer guy was good. Carrie's interview is definitely a step below those two.
Steve is one of the best interviewer's of the band/Eddie I have seen; Mark was good; Carrie was decent; and Judd sucked.
Judd?
Yup. Wynonna Judd
:o

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:15 pm
by Mine
Wasn't the 10C supposed to post on their site where and when this interviews are out? Seems like they gave up after the 1st.

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:17 pm
by Thejambi
Mine wrote:Wasn't the 10C supposed to post on their site where and when this interviews are out? Seems like they gave up after the 1st.
Doesn't sound like the 10c to be lazy like that.

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:20 pm
by Mine
Thejambi wrote:
Mine wrote:Wasn't the 10C supposed to post on their site where and when this interviews are out? Seems like they gave up after the 1st.
Doesn't sound like the 10c to be lazy like that.
Besides the obvious bitching it seems like a really bad move when we're talking about such a big part of the new album promotion at the exact time they, in theory, should be concentrating the most.

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:20 pm
by ledvedderman
Mine wrote:Wasn't the 10C supposed to post on their site where and when this interviews are out? Seems like they gave up after the 1st.
Ten Club is usually the last place I go for news. I have much better luck on the Dora The Explorer site. That Boots get all the scoops.

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:21 pm
by Mirella
Stone and bongos: always a pleasure! :)



groetjes,
Mirella :)

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:22 pm
by evenslow
to be fair, 10c has done a relatively wonderful job of promotion for this thing.

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:25 pm
by Mine
ledvedderman wrote:
Mine wrote:Wasn't the 10C supposed to post on their site where and when this interviews are out? Seems like they gave up after the 1st.
Ten Club is usually the last place I go for news. I have much better luck on the Dora The Explorer site. That Boots get all the scoops.
yeah yeah i know but they actually wrote in the post about the EPK that they were going to post the info about those videos as they get released.

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:31 pm
by Hypnos

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:36 pm
by Cleverman
I might have to re-read to be sure, but did he even mention the album or its songs at all? I don't know if talking shit on a blog post qualifies as a review, but maybe I'm too picky

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:37 pm
by Cleverman
Oh, and who is Josh Tesh?

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:38 pm
by harmless
That's just a shitty review of the MYM single that I shared for a laugh shortly after it came out.

Re: ITT: Pearl Jam vs. Dogs

Posted: Mon October 07, 2013 5:39 pm
by stupidmop
I skipped backward a few pages on that blog and I still dont understand what it actually is. Psychotic ramblings? Reviews of music ive never heard of? Poetry? Is it poetry? Idk