Red Mosquito

What's her deal?

She's smart. She's experienced. She is more than capable of running the country.

She just has no star power and i foresee donald trump perhaps wiping the floor with her "personality" wise.

She’s an ineffectual centrist steward of the status quo who fearmongers about M4A. She can get fucked.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:She’s an ineffectual centrist steward of the status quo who fearmongers about M4A. She can get fucked.

yeah she sure does draw a lot of .flac from both sides

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:She’s an ineffectual centrist steward of the status quo who fearmongers about M4A. She can get fucked.

yeah she sure does draw a lot of .flac from both sides

Excellent

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:She’s an ineffectual centrist steward of the status quo who fearmongers about M4A. She can get fucked.

yeah she sure does draw a lot of .flac from both sides

I came here to make sure this got done. Excellent work, Ruddo.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:She’s an ineffectual centrist steward of the status quo who fearmongers about M4A. She can get fucked.

yeah she sure does draw a lot of .flac from both sides

I hate puns passionately but I cannot deny how good this was

tragabigzanda wrote:She’s also been really abusive to her staff

indeed. Friends of friends who have worked with her here in MN and all the stories are 100% true.

The Democratic party must have someone better than Sanders? But whoever else is discussed here, most seem so negative.

Anders wrote:The Democratic party must have someone better than Sanders? But whoever else is discussed here, most seem so negative.

He’s the only good candidate though

tragabigzanda wrote:She’s also been really abusive to her staff

oh, like you've never thrown a salad at one of your underlings when he or she didn't get your order 100% to your liking

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Anders wrote:The Democratic party must have someone better than Sanders? But whoever else is discussed here, most seem so negative.

He’s the only good candidate though

He will be 79 before the election, and calls himself a democratic socialist.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Anders wrote:The Democratic party must have someone better than Sanders? But whoever else is discussed here, most seem so negative.

He’s the only good candidate though

how "good" can a candidate be when the very ideas and beliefs for which he stands and for which people vote will be watered down or thrown completely out the window after he takes office, thus relegating him to a 78-year-old male version of other centrist, non-"good" candidates? put another way, what separates him from others now simply won't carry day during his presidency.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Anders wrote:The Democratic party must have someone better than Sanders? But whoever else is discussed here, most seem so negative.

He’s the only good candidate though

I really don't understand the resistance to him.

The president is not a dictator. Most of the stuff bernie talks about doing either won't happen or will be watered down by congress.

What matters is having someone in the white house who is compassionate and principled, which bernie most definitely is.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Anders wrote:The Democratic party must have someone better than Sanders? But whoever else is discussed here, most seem so negative.

He’s the only good candidate though

how "good" can a candidate be when the very ideas and beliefs for which he stands and for which people vote will be watered down or thrown completely out the window after he takes office, thus relegating him to a 78-year-old male version of other centrist, non-"good" candidates? put another way, what separates him from others now simply won't carry day during his presidency.

They wont listen because the implementation is counterproductive and doesn't matter.... only the raging against the machine does. They don't want to win, they want to fight.

Anders wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Anders wrote:The Democratic party must have someone better than Sanders? But whoever else is discussed here, most seem so negative.

He’s the only good candidate though

He will be 79 before the election, and calls himself a democratic socialist.

So?

Chris_H_2 wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Anders wrote:The Democratic party must have someone better than Sanders? But whoever else is discussed here, most seem so negative.

He’s the only good candidate though

how "good" can a candidate be when the very ideas and beliefs for which he stands and for which people vote will be watered down or thrown completely out the window after he takes office, thus relegating him to a 78-year-old male version of other centrist, non-"good" candidates? put another way, what separates him from others now simply won't carry day during his presidency.

So....we should vote for a candidate who won’t even try? I don’t understand what you’re advocating here.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Anders wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Anders wrote:The Democratic party must have someone better than Sanders? But whoever else is discussed here, most seem so negative.

He’s the only good candidate though

He will be 79 before the election, and calls himself a democratic socialist.

So?

That is too old to be a good president. Certanly in the long term.

I would never vote for a socialist. More taxes and government control, less freedom. The US could use further health care reforms, but I do not believe a socialist rule is a good choice.