Page 138 of 792
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 2:39 pm
by Norah
philpritchard wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Exactly, it would be hilariously earth shattering news in the baseball world.
The best part would be the Hall of Fame voters trying to justify letting him in while Clemens, Bonds, A-Rod, etc. remain outside... because I guarantee Jeter would still get in anyway.
They're all gonna get in.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 2:41 pm
by elliseamos
cutuphalfdead wrote:philpritchard wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Exactly, it would be hilariously earth shattering news in the baseball world.
The best part would be the Hall of Fame voters trying to justify letting him in while Clemens, Bonds, A-Rod, etc. remain outside... because I guarantee Jeter would still get in anyway.
They're all gonna get in.
somewhere, pete rose is crying.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 2:48 pm
by elliseamos
i'm sure this is something that only bugs red sox fans, too.
- Spoiler: show

Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 2:53 pm
by philpritchard
I've never liked Jeter. There, I said it. I know a lot of it is jealousy over watching him win and win and win while the Jays finished third in the East every year, but there's always been something about him that made me want to punch him in the face.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 2:58 pm
by elliseamos
philpritchard wrote:I've never liked Jeter. There, I said it. I know a lot of it is jealousy over watching him win and win and win while the Jays finished third in the East every year, but there's always been something about him that made me want to punch him in the face.
thanks for sharing, Phil.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 3:05 pm
by Peeps
elliseamos wrote:philpritchard wrote:I've never liked Jeter. There, I said it. I know a lot of it is jealousy over watching him win and win and win while the Jays finished third in the East every year, but there's always been something about him that made me want to punch him in the face.
thanks for sharing, dr Phil.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 3:19 pm
by elliseamos
Peeps wrote:elliseamos wrote:philpritchard wrote:I've never liked Jeter. There, I said it. I know a lot of it is jealousy over watching him win and win and win while the Jays finished third in the East every year, but there's always been something about him that made me want to punch him in the face.
thanks for sharing, dr Phil.
thanks for editing, Peeps.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 3:24 pm
by philpritchard
You're all very, very welcome.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 3:31 pm
by elliseamos
it sounds like the names won't come out for a while and that they won't be major players (but also not minor leaguers).
So no Papi or Jeter this time around.
@TJQuinnESPN wrote:The DEA and DOJ people I spoke to said the names of other players should be revealed publicly during discovery. Could take weeks or months.
@TJQuinnESPN wrote:Doesn't sound like there are major names, but not borderline major leaguers, either. Fairly significant. Probably not more than a few.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 3:52 pm
by philpritchard
elliseamos wrote:it sounds like the names won't come out for a while and that they won't be major players (but also not minor leaguers).
So no Papi or Jeter this time around.
@TJQuinnESPN wrote:The DEA and DOJ people I spoke to said the names of other players should be revealed publicly during discovery. Could take weeks or months.
@TJQuinnESPN wrote:Doesn't sound like there are major names, but not borderline major leaguers, either. Fairly significant. Probably not more than a few.
Booooring.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 3:59 pm
by Norah
I hope it's Stephen Drew.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 4:09 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
It's probably Sugar Ray Marimon
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 4:14 pm
by philpritchard
Some soft-tossing pitcher would make a lot of heads explode too. That would be fun.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 4:45 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
philpritchard wrote:Some soft-tossing pitcher would make a lot of heads explode too. That would be fun.
Chris Young is totally juicing.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 4:54 pm
by numbers
I hope it's Daniel Nava.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 5:05 pm
by philpritchard
cutuphalfdead wrote:philpritchard wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:Exactly, it would be hilariously earth shattering news in the baseball world.
The best part would be the Hall of Fame voters trying to justify letting him in while Clemens, Bonds, A-Rod, etc. remain outside... because I guarantee Jeter would still get in anyway.
They're all gonna get in.
I don't think they'll get in until the crotchety old voters retire/die and a new set of voters with an ability to think critically takes over.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 5:07 pm
by numbers
What kills me about it is how guys like bagwell and piazza aren't getting close to enough votes, just because people assume.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 5:22 pm
by philpritchard
numbers wrote:What kills me about it is how guys like bagwell and piazza aren't getting close to enough votes, just because people assume.
But Bagwell didn't hit for power in the minors and Piazza had acne! Obviously they had to be on roids!
That's why I think a soft-tossing pitcher would be awesome. It would really mess with the narrative of all breakout power hitters being assumed to be guilty and everyone else assumed innocent.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 5:39 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Piazza will get in I think. He had what like 63% of the votes last year? I bet he gets in sometime in the next 5 years or so. Should already be in I think but I don't have a vote. BUT I SHOULD!
As for Bagwell I give him a pass on not having 500 which is the magic number for sluggers. He was having his best season ever during 94 (so add 20 homers there if not for the strike) and played the bulk (no pun intended) of his career in the Astrodome. What he has going for him is he was a good all around player and not just a slugger. He ran well (two 30-30 seasons), was a gold glove caliber first baseman and was right around .300 for his career. It's kind of alarming for his HoF case that his % of votes have gone down but I got to think he will get in down the road. He has a higher WAR all time than Joe DiMaggio, Robin Yount, Frank Thomas, Johnny Bench, Paul Molitor and Reggie Jackson. A higher OPS than Willie Mays and Hank Aaron. I find Bagwell to be incredibly underrated. Maybe he wasn't dominant (one MVP and two other top 5 MVP finishes) but a hall of famer I think.
He was very similar to Frank Thomas. I think Thomas was better but there are quite a few similarities there. Also, its creepy they have the same date of birth.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed August 06, 2014 5:59 pm
by philpritchard
BigRedLedbetter wrote:Piazza will get in I think. He had what like 63% of the votes last year? I bet he gets in sometime in the next 5 years or so. Should already be in I think but I don't have a vote. BUT I SHOULD!
As for Bagwell I give him a pass on not having 500 which is the magic number for sluggers. He was having his best season ever during 94 (so add 20 homers there if not for the strike) and played the bulk (no pun intended) of his career in the Astrodome. What he has going for him is he was a good all around player and not just a slugger. He ran well (two 30-30 seasons), was a gold glove caliber first baseman and was right around .300 for his career. It's kind of alarming for his HoF case that his % of votes have gone down but I got to think he will get in down the road. He has a higher WAR all time than Joe DiMaggio, Robin Yount, Frank Thomas, Johnny Bench, Paul Molitor and Reggie Jackson. A higher OPS than Willie Mays and Hank Aaron. I find Bagwell to be incredibly underrated. Maybe he wasn't dominant (one MVP and two other top 5 MVP finishes) but a hall of famer I think.
He was very similar to Frank Thomas. I think Thomas was better but there are quite a few similarities there. Also, its creepy they have the same date of birth.
Bagwell is an absolute no-doubt Hall of Famer.