The Red House, inspiration for the new autonomous zone was foreclosed on largely due to the soverign citizen antics of the former owner's son. Sucks for the parents, but their son sounds like a pretty shitty person.
Edit: Parents are crazy too
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Thu December 10, 2020 8:52 pm
by macphisto
Sovereign citizens are fucking lol.
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Thu December 10, 2020 11:20 pm
by simple schoolboy
How long until the red house has its own body count?
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Thu December 10, 2020 11:35 pm
by Bi_3
simple schoolboy wrote:
How long until the red house has its own body count?
Seriously. I know at this point we shouldn't be surprised by the mindless, violent behavior of progressive "activists" but it's still hard to watch.
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Fri December 11, 2020 2:49 pm
by Orpheus
Sovereign citizens aren't progressives, they're just nuts. Not every person you don't like or find crazy is a progressive.
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Fri December 11, 2020 2:51 pm
by B
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Fri December 11, 2020 3:12 pm
by verb_to_trust
simple schoolboy wrote:
How long until the red house has its own body count?
This guy was foreclosed on in 2018. Get a fucking job so when you finally get thrown out two years later you aren't totally screwed. People don't get evicted overnight.
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Fri December 11, 2020 3:42 pm
by simple schoolboy
Orpheus wrote:Sovereign citizens aren't progressives, they're just nuts. Not every person you don't like or find crazy is a progressive.
Some number of the supporters ID as progressive. Mostly anarchists, but w/e. Why did you think BI_3 was referring to the former homeowners?
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Fri December 11, 2020 8:07 pm
by Bi_3
simple schoolboy wrote:
Orpheus wrote:Sovereign citizens aren't progressives, they're just nuts. Not every person you don't like or find crazy is a progressive.
Some number of the supporters ID as progressive. Mostly anarchists, but w/e. Why did you think BI_3 was referring to the former homeowners?
McCloskey's (St Luis gun couple) Prosecutor was dismissed from the case. The prosecutor had used the case in re-election campaign fundraising material. Judge declares that an indifferent prosecutor would have likely dropped the charges.
Let us hate on the McCloskey's for their litigation that enriches only them, not for being reasonably concerned about a tresspassing mob and attempting to prevent further agression.
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Sun December 13, 2020 3:45 am
by BurtReynolds
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Sun December 13, 2020 3:56 am
by Bammer
That “militant” is about 4’10” and a buck-0-five dripping wet.
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Sun December 13, 2020 3:58 am
by BurtReynolds
Bammer wrote:
That “militant” is about 4’10” and a buck-0-five dripping wet.
pretty standard antifa size
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Sun December 13, 2020 4:13 am
by simple schoolboy
Portland retailers are not able to renew on their previous insurance terms. Carveouts for civic unrest, with high premiums and deductibles, low coverage caps.
But hey, rioting is nbg cuz they have insurance, right?
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Sun December 13, 2020 5:54 am
by Bammer
simple schoolboy wrote:Portland retailers are not able to renew on their previous insurance terms. Carveouts for civic unrest, with high premiums and deductibles, low coverage caps.
But hey, rioting is nbg cuz they have insurance, right?
Kinda-sorta related ... there is a proposal making the rounds in Seattle that would legitimately allow stealing if the defense is “I am to poor to afford to purchase it.”
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Sun December 13, 2020 5:57 am
by Peeps
I can’t fathom being part of a group that does this and goes by the name proud boys
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Sun December 13, 2020 6:03 am
by Higgs
Peeps wrote:
I can’t fathom being part of a group that does this and goes by the name proud boys
Certainly absolutely nothing to be proud of there. Fucking disgusting.
Re: The Protest Thread
Posted: Sun December 13, 2020 6:03 am
by BurtReynolds
Bammer wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:Portland retailers are not able to renew on their previous insurance terms. Carveouts for civic unrest, with high premiums and deductibles, low coverage caps.
But hey, rioting is nbg cuz they have insurance, right?
Kinda-sorta related ... there is a proposal making the rounds in Seattle that would legitimately allow stealing if the defense is “I am to poor to afford to purchase it.”
Sounds like they were trying to sneak it in from what I read.