Red Mosquito

epilogue wrote:Oh no! We've lost the war! We'll never get Burt now!

BurtReynolds wrote:Stay losin'!

tommy wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:The same men that insist ‘men’ have no place in women’s sports insist they have a right to dictate what happens in women’s wombs.

It’s quite the fuckin comedic cakeism

This is the type of thing that's losing the democrats voters. There's just no support for trans women in women's sports.

dimejinky99 wrote:

tommy wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:The same men that insist ‘men’ have no place in women’s sports insist they have a right to dictate what happens in women’s wombs.

It’s quite the fuckin comedic cakeism

This is the type of thing that's losing the democrats voters. There's just no support for trans women in women's sports.

And there’s no support for rapists in women’s wombs

*say yes there is they just made him president. I dare you*

BurtReynolds wrote:

epilogue wrote:Oh no! We've lost the war! We'll never get Burt now!

Is that another one of your "objective" truths?

tommy wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

tommy wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:The same men that insist ‘men’ have no place in women’s sports insist they have a right to dictate what happens in women’s wombs.

It’s quite the fuckin comedic cakeism

This is the type of thing that's losing the democrats voters. There's just no support for trans women in women's sports.

And there’s no support for rapists in women’s wombs

*say yes there is they just made him president. I dare you*

Can someone translate this for me, please?

BurtReynolds wrote:Libs not winning the optics war anytime soon

epilogue wrote:

Matters wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Matters wrote:You have a habit of being nasty towards those who you disagree with.

This is categorically, provably untrue.

He banned me on my third day on this forum simply because he didn’t know who I was. He later called me a liar after I talked about my son’s healthcare experience. Then he told me I’m a hateful person because I objectively posted news articles and expressed my opinion that I don’t think males should be allowed to participate in female sports competitions.

There is a long and complex history of harassment from previously banned users creating new/second/multiple accounts. Your posting when you first arrived triggered a lot of red flags. Obviously, your account was reinstated and here you are.

I don't recall seeing those posts. You'd have to show me exactly what he said. I know he has a lot of knowledge and experience in the healthcare space.

There are no males in female sports competitions. Saying that some women should be banned is a hateful and ignorant opinion, objectively.

Matters wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Matters wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Matters wrote:You have a habit of being nasty towards those who you disagree with.

This is categorically, provably untrue.

He banned me on my third day on this forum simply because he didn’t know who I was. He later called me a liar after I talked about my son’s healthcare experience. Then he told me I’m a hateful person because I objectively posted news articles and expressed my opinion that I don’t think males should be allowed to participate in female sports competitions.

There is a long and complex history of harassment from previously banned users creating new/second/multiple accounts. Your posting when you first arrived triggered a lot of red flags. Obviously, your account was reinstated and here you are.

I don't recall seeing those posts. You'd have to show me exactly what he said. I know he has a lot of knowledge and experience in the healthcare space.

There are no males in female sports competitions. Saying that some women should be banned is a hateful and ignorant opinion, objectively.

Iirc my first ever post was me introducing myself to the board. I’d be interested to know what I said that triggered any “red flag” warnings.

I’m not going to take the time to look for his response to what I posted about my son but I’m confident that he knows what he said.

We’re not going agree on the sports issue and that’s ok but no one is being hateful.

BurtReynolds wrote:

epilogue wrote:There are no "trans issues." There is no "trans debate." There are only trans people, and the people who support them, and the people who support, either actively or passively, their oppression.

Please keep spouting this rhetoric. Never stop. Nothing discredits your ideology more than willfully confusing any and all critique of it as support for oppression!

Iowa Governor Signs Bill Ending Transgender Civil Rights Protections
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/28/us/i ... roid-share

epilogue wrote: BREAKING: Cis, straight, white man "willfully" ignores oppression.

epilogue wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

epilogue wrote:There are no "trans issues." There is no "trans debate." There are only trans people, and the people who support them, and the people who support, either actively or passively, their oppression.

Please keep spouting this rhetoric. Never stop. Nothing discredits your ideology more than willfully confusing any and all critique of it as support for oppression!

Iowa Governor Signs Bill Ending Transgender Civil Rights Protections
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/28/us/i ... roid-share

BREAKING: Cis, straight, white man "willfully" ignores oppression.

dimejinky99 wrote:Lord give me the confidence of a bi or a Burt to spend all day on an internet forum pontificating about trans rights or gay rights or women’s rights while not having the first fuckin clue about any of these things and nothing but the determination to keep bullshitting on regardless.