Page 15 of 48
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 4:42 pm
by Electromatic
Making 7 super bowls is still a pretty awesome accomplishment.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 4:46 pm
by Green Habit
Electromatic wrote:Making 7 super bowls is still a pretty awesome accomplishment.
At the party I was at, my fellow Broncos friend was obviously depressed and was starting to wonder what was even the point of getting there if they were going to get killed.
The host of the party, a Browns fan, found a funny way to say "STFU" in response.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 4:57 pm
by surfndestroy
Green Habit wrote:Regardless of what happened here, the future is still bright. Elway's building this team very well. Just take your lumps, move on, and keep doing your job.
Who's your starting qb come 2015? That's a pretty big whole that needs to be filled.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 5:07 pm
by Green Habit
surfndestroy wrote:Green Habit wrote:Regardless of what happened here, the future is still bright. Elway's building this team very well. Just take your lumps, move on, and keep doing your job.
Who's your starting qb come 2015? That's a pretty big whole that needs to be filled.
The team's at least prepared with Osweiler and Dysert--of course who knows what they will do. But the rest of the team is built well. I don't think the 2013 Broncos are the 2009 Colts, where Polian's bad GM moves were soon exposed badly afterwards.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 5:34 pm
by Coach
Green Habit wrote:Electromatic wrote:Making 7 super bowls is still a pretty awesome accomplishment.
At the party I was at, my fellow Broncos friend was obviously depressed and was starting to wonder what was even the point of getting there if they were going to get killed.
The host of the party, a Browns fan, found a funny way to say "STFU" in response.
The Pats are 3-4 in Super Bowls. It's awesome to reach the Super Bowl...not so awesome to lose it so often. I can understand what Denver is going through today and feel badly.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 6:02 pm
by Bammer
Peeps wrote:Lament wrote:Bammer wrote:The only thing potentially in the way of a Seahawks dynasty are the 9ers, Cardinals, and Rams.
"This is the start of a dynasty!" -Steelers fans, February of 2006
"This is the start of a dynasty!" -Colts fans, February of 2007
"This is the start of a dynasty!" -Giants fans, February of 2008
"This time this is REALLY the start of a dynasty!" -Steelers fans, February of 2009
"This is the start of a dynasty!" -Saints fans, February of 2010
"This is the start of a dynasty!" -Packers fans, February of 2011
"This time this is REALLY the start of a dynasty!" -Giants fans, February of 2012.
"This is the start of a dynasty!" -Seahawks fans, February of 2014.
Meanwhile the 00's Patriots, 90's Cowboys, 80's 49ers, 70's Steelers, and 60's Packers chuckle...
this is why he is insufferable
I'm telling you. Start paying attention. Oh and any of those free agents your team wants? They would prefer to play in Seattle.
http://blog.seahawks.com/2013/01/26/mel ... inus-to-a/
http://seattle.sbnation.com/2012/4/29/2 ... 2-seahawks
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1022 ... rom-d-to-b
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 6:09 pm
by Self
Bammer wrote:Oh and any of those free agents your team wants? They would prefer to play in Seattle.
In my experience, they would prefer to play where the $ is. Especially once they have a ring.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 6:13 pm
by BurtReynolds
Has anyone checked on peyton today? Is he alive?
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 6:22 pm
by Lament
Coach wrote:I'd only add the Rams claim to the start of dynasty right before kickoff vs. the Pats in the Super Bowl.
We shouldn't forget the Tampa Bay dynasty that was upon us after they won the Super Bowl. I mean, they had a young head coach who was going to be the next Vince Lombardi and a defense that gave up less points than the 85 Bears. They were probably gonna win five in a row.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 6:54 pm
by Coach
Lament wrote:Coach wrote:I'd only add the Rams claim to the start of dynasty right before kickoff vs. the Pats in the Super Bowl.
We shouldn't forget the Tampa Bay dynasty that was upon us after they won the Super Bowl. I mean, they had a young head coach who was going to be the next Vince Lombardi and a defense that gave up less points than the 85 Bears. They were probably gonna win five in a row.
That's a good one, too. I'm sure that Warren Sapp agrees.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 8:04 pm
by warehouse
BurtReynolds wrote:Has anyone checked on peyton today? Is he alive?
he's at eli's house crying
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 9:27 pm
by Bammer
Self wrote:Bammer wrote:Oh and any of those free agents your team wants? They would prefer to play in Seattle.
In my experience, they would prefer to play where the $ is. Especially once they have a ring.
I'm going to respond to this over in the Seahawks thread where it belongs...
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 10:29 pm
by Harry Lime
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Tue February 04, 2014 5:25 pm
by Thejambi
Harry Lime wrote:
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Thu March 06, 2014 3:08 am
by Green Habit
I knew this was going to happen, but the moment still sucks.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Fri March 07, 2014 5:15 pm
by Coach
Green Habit wrote:I knew this was going to happen, but the moment still sucks.
I hear ya. Pats are likely to lose out on the Talib free agency sweepstakes.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Fri March 07, 2014 6:09 pm
by Green Habit
Coach wrote:Green Habit wrote:I knew this was going to happen, but the moment still sucks.
I hear ya. Pats are likely to lose out on the Talib free agency sweepstakes.
I think both moves are rational even though they make fans feel bad. Both Bailey (age) and Talib (character) have flags.
Florio's been rumor mongering that the Broncos and Pats could end up in a fight over Revis. Not sure what I would think about that for either team.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Sat March 08, 2014 1:57 am
by Green Habit
Since the Broncos aren't even going to offer a tender to Trindon Holliday, I'd like them to sign Darren Sproles. It could be a very small step towards correcting the worst draft decision Mike Shanahan ever made--taking Maurice Clarett over Sproles, and letting him torment the Broncos for several years when the Chargers took him.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon March 10, 2014 3:38 pm
by Coach
Green Habit wrote:Coach wrote:Green Habit wrote:I knew this was going to happen, but the moment still sucks.
I hear ya. Pats are likely to lose out on the Talib free agency sweepstakes.
I think both moves are rational even though they make fans feel bad. Both Bailey (age) and Talib (character) have flags.
Florio's been rumor mongering that the Broncos and Pats could end up in a fight over Revis. Not sure what I would think about that for either team.
Without Talib (or a shutdown corner) we saw how badly the Pats truly are on defense.
I'm not as familiar with Denver's situation, but in terms of securing a shutdown corner, I'd be in favor of going "all in" on Revis and/or Talib given Brady's increasingly small window to winner another title.
Re: Denver Broncos
Posted: Mon March 10, 2014 4:50 pm
by Electromatic
Green Habit wrote:Since the Broncos aren't even going to offer a tender to Trindon Holliday, I'd like them to sign Darren Sproles. It could be a very small step towards correcting the worst draft decision Mike Shanahan ever made--taking Maurice Clarett over Sproles, and letting him torment the Broncos for several years when the Chargers took him.
I would be interested to see how Sproles would fit in with the Patriots.